我國銀行業(yè)逆周期監(jiān)管政策研究
[Abstract]:After the current financial crisis, international financial regulators and national regulatory authorities began to reflect on the shortcomings and deficiencies of traditional banking supervision, and reached a consensus that the pro-cyclical nature of commercial banks was an important cause of the financial crisis. It is imperative to strengthen the research of banking countercyclical policy under the framework of macro-prudential supervision. By analyzing the procyclical effect of Chinese commercial banks under the traditional supervision policy, this paper finds out the problems existing in the countercyclical supervision of China's banking industry, and finally puts forward some policy suggestions on how to perfect the framework of countercyclical supervision in China's banking industry. This is also the purpose of this paper. This paper first introduces the research results of banks' pro-cyclical and countercyclical supervision policies and the theories related to financial countercyclical supervision, which lays a theoretical foundation for the research work. Then, using a large number of empirical data and models to analyze the pro-periodicity of commercial banks in China, and draw a conclusion: internal rating method, capital adequacy regulation and fair value accounting standards will bring pro-cyclical to our commercial banks. On the basis of empirical analysis, this paper discusses in detail the current situation and problems of countercyclical supervision of banks in China, and thinks that the policy of countercyclical supervision in China needs to be improved. Then this paper summarizes the practical experience of domestic and foreign regulatory authorities in the field of countercyclical supervision, including: dynamic reserve system, countercyclical capital buffer, commercial bank stress testing, leverage ratio and loan ratio. Finally, on the basis of the above analysis, the author puts forward some policy suggestions to perfect the countercyclical supervision framework of China's banking industry, and then puts forward the counter-cyclical supervision suggestions from the aspects of capital supervision, accounting standards and ratio index respectively. The innovations of this paper are as follows: first, using the KMV model to investigate the procyclicality of the internal rating method of commercial banks in China in stages; secondly, finding that smooth factor entry may affect the effect of countercyclical capital buffering. And determine the value of the smoothing factor suitable for China. Third, put forward the policy recommendations to improve the countercyclical regulatory framework of China's banking industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F832.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 唐梅;林友緒;;后危機(jī)時代公允價值會計順周期效應(yīng)研究:中國的經(jīng)驗數(shù)據(jù)[J];財會通訊;2011年33期
2 韓俊華;;金融危機(jī)中的順周期效應(yīng)并非公允價值計量所致[J];財會月刊;2011年05期
3 鹿波;;中國上市公司違約率的順周期效應(yīng)實證研究——評估巴塞爾協(xié)議Ⅱ順周期效應(yīng)的初步嘗試[J];金融論壇;2009年03期
4 徐明東;陳學(xué)彬;;動態(tài)撥備模式的國際比較與中國模式探討[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期
5 晏艷陽;張貞貞;;我國上市公司違約率的順周期效應(yīng)分析[J];南方金融;2011年04期
6 羅平;;資本監(jiān)管制度的順周期性及其補(bǔ)救方法[J];國際金融研究;2009年06期
7 鐘偉;謝婷;;巴塞爾協(xié)議Ⅲ的新近進(jìn)展及其影響初探[J];國際金融研究;2011年03期
8 方芳;劉鵬;;中國金融順周期效應(yīng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2010年08期
9 高國華;潘英麗;;我國商業(yè)銀行資本充足率順周期效應(yīng)研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2010年12期
10 李文泓;;關(guān)于宏觀審慎監(jiān)管框架下逆周期政策的探討[J];金融研究;2009年07期
,本文編號:2290455
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/bankxd/2290455.html