基于KMV模型的我國農(nóng)業(yè)類上市公司信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究
[Abstract]:With the deepening of China's reform and opening up and the rapid economic development, the financial market has also been unprecedented development. As the most important intermediary in the financial market, commercial banks increase the credit risk to a certain extent while the scale expands rapidly, and put forward higher requirements on the ability of risk management. With the joint-stock system reform and successful listing of banks, as an independent economy, participate in the operation of the entire market economy, facing fierce competition and various risks. In all the risks it faces, credit risk is particularly important. As the basis of the whole capital market, listed companies play a key role in the development of capital market. Therefore, it is of practical significance to study the credit risk of listed companies. This paper first introduces the traditional credit risk assessment methods and modern financial engineering models, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the four modern financial engineering models (Credit Metrics (Credit Risl book model), Credit portfolio Vie model and KMV model). The KMV model is suitable for the study of credit risk measurement of listed companies in China. Then the theoretical basis and calculation process of the KMV model are introduced, and some parameters are modified according to the actual situation of China's capital market to make it more suitable for the actual situation of China's capital market. Finally, through the use of MATLAB software programming for empirical analysis, there are 60 agricultural listed companies listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets at present, of which several are listed (3 in the first and 12 in the second) because of the short time of listing. Unable to obtain enough transaction data to be excluded from the sample. On the basis of calculating the distance of breach of contract, this paper first analyzes the whole credit risk of period one and period two, and draws the conclusion that the credit risk of period 02:00 is obviously lower than that of period one. Then the total sample is divided into main board, small and medium-sized board and growth enterprise board according to the different listed plates. The distance of breach of contract is calculated respectively, and the trend of change is compared. It is concluded that the default distance between the small and medium-sized board and the gem listed companies has increased by a large margin in the second period, while the default distance of the main board listed companies has decreased slightly. That is, the credit risk of the listed companies in the small and medium board and the growth Enterprise Market is reduced by a large margin in the second period, while the default risk of the listed companies on the main Board is increased by a small margin. Finally, it is divided into different sub-industries in agriculture. It is concluded that the default risk of forestry plate has a large increase, while the default risk of fruit industry, livestock, seafood and feed listed companies has a large decline. According to the above conclusions, this paper puts forward the following policy suggestions: first, strengthen market supervision and improve the quality of listed companies. Second, establish and perfect default database. Third, continue to strengthen the revision of the KMV model. Fourth, improve agricultural status, refine agricultural subsidies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F224;F324;F832.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張澤京;陳曉紅;王傅強(qiáng);;基于KMV模型的我國中小上市公司信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2007年11期
2 周杰;;修正的KMV模型在上市公司信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量中的應(yīng)用分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2009年15期
3 周開國;當(dāng)代信貸風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量模型及評析[J];南方金融;2005年07期
4 陳忠陽;信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)量化管理模型發(fā)展探析[J];國際金融研究;2000年10期
5 程鵬,吳沖鋒,李為冰;信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量和管理方法研究[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期
6 孫小琰;沈悅;羅璐琦;;基于KMV模型的我國上市公司價(jià)值評估實(shí)證研究[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期
7 魯煒,趙恒珩,方兆本,劉冀云;KMV模型在公司價(jià)值評估中的應(yīng)用[J];管理科學(xué);2003年03期
8 沈沛龍,任若恩;現(xiàn)代信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理模型和方法的比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2002年03期
9 劉利文;王吉恒;王國榮;;KMV模型在我國商業(yè)銀行信貸風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理中的應(yīng)用研究[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年10期
10 謝邦昌;朱世武;李璇;董春;;我國上市公司信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量模型的選擇[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2008年05期
,本文編號:2132635
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/bankxd/2132635.html