本文選題：對外直接投資 + 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國在1985年首次出臺專利法案,結(jié)束了之前沒有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護的局面,并于1992年和2000年對其經(jīng)行實質(zhì)性修改后,形成了一個逐步改革并不斷完善的專利系統(tǒng)。這意味著在開放經(jīng)濟環(huán)境下,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護的強度對于外商直接投資的影響越來越大,甚至成為我國吸引FDI的一個重要力量。利用外商直接投資一直是我國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的一個重要戰(zhàn)略。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護程度將會在很大程度上制約外商投資的力度和水平。為了持續(xù)高效的吸引FDI,研究我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護強度和FDI增長之間的關(guān)系,從而為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)政策提供理論指導(dǎo)具有很強的現(xiàn)實意義,并成為一個亟待解決的重要課題。 針對發(fā)展中國家,探索知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在吸引外商直接投資中產(chǎn)生作用的實證研究文章較少,尤其是研究像中國這樣的具有相當模仿能力的大型發(fā)展中經(jīng)濟國家。本文首先從理論方面驗證了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護強度和FDI的關(guān)系,然后在理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上引入引力模型驗證了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護強度與激增的中國外國直接投資的實證關(guān)系。我們在進行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)強度衡量時,探討了國際上最常用IPR保護強度測定方法在中國使用的可行性和局限性,并根據(jù)諸多中國學(xué)者研究對其進行了修正。本文利用30個國家的面板數(shù)據(jù),證實了在中國加強知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護強度對FDI有著積極并且顯著的影響。最后在前面分析的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護存在的具體問題,在宏觀管理和微觀實施上提出了有效的建議。 本文著眼于中國這樣一個在國際上具有強大影響力的發(fā)展中經(jīng)濟體,在過去的二十年經(jīng)濟發(fā)展過程中中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度經(jīng)歷了非常顯著的變化。過去的學(xué)術(shù)研究大部分站在工業(yè)化母國(例如：美國)的角度去研究FDI資金流向多樣化的東道國群體的過程,本文首先針對IPR保護強度對FDI增長的作用進行了理論分析和格蘭杰因果關(guān)系探討。在格蘭杰因果關(guān)系檢驗基礎(chǔ)上我們斷定了IPR與FDI有單相的格蘭杰因果關(guān)系,于是我們引入引力模型用容量為30個國家的面板數(shù)據(jù),這些數(shù)據(jù)覆蓋了更廣的時間(1985-2009),我們同時對于IPR的測定方法進行了改進,對傳統(tǒng)國際研究采用的GinartePark方法進行了修正,使得實證結(jié)果更為精確。 實證結(jié)果表明,加強知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護對于中國在吸引外商直接投資上對中國有著積極和顯著得影響。結(jié)果還表明,除了知識產(chǎn)權(quán),市場規(guī)模的大小區(qū)域一體化、運輸和交易成本在中國對于FDI也是很重要的決定因素。此外,這個結(jié)果對于任何一個模型和數(shù)據(jù)樣本的分割都有較強的穩(wěn)健性。例如,無論是采用怎樣的IPR政策,無論FDI源于發(fā)達還是發(fā)展中國家,IPR對于FDI的正面影響都具有十分顯著的效果�？偟膩碚f,我們的結(jié)果表明,加強在發(fā)展中國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán),特別是發(fā)展中大型經(jīng)濟體,可以起到促進吸引外商直接投資的積極作用,從而引發(fā)技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移。
[Abstract]:Our country first issued the patent bill in 1985, which ended the situation that there was no intellectual property right protection before, and after it was substantially revised in 1992 and 2000, a patent system was gradually reformed and perfected. This means that under the open economic environment, the intensity of intellectual property protection has more and more influence on foreign direct investment, and even becomes an important force to attract FDI in China. The utilization of foreign direct investment has been an important strategy for China's economic development. The degree of intellectual property protection will greatly restrict the intensity and level of foreign investment. In order to attract FDI continuously and efficiently, it is of great practical significance to study the relationship between the intensity of intellectual property protection and the growth of FDI in China, thus providing theoretical guidance for intellectual property policy is of great practical significance, and has become an important subject to be solved urgently. For developing countries, there are few empirical studies on the role of intellectual property in attracting foreign direct investment, especially in large developing economies such as China. In this paper, the relationship between intellectual property protection intensity and FDI is theoretically verified, and then the gravitational model is introduced to verify the empirical relationship between intellectual property protection intensity and the surge of Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) on the basis of theoretical analysis. When we measure the intensity of intellectual property, we discuss the feasibility and limitation of the most commonly used IPR protection strength measurement method in China, and revise it according to many Chinese scholars' research. Using panel data from 30 countries, this paper proves that strengthening the intensity of intellectual property protection in China has a positive and significant impact on FDI. Finally, on the basis of the previous analysis, combined with the specific problems of intellectual property protection in China, the author puts forward some effective suggestions on macro management and micro implementation. This paper focuses on China, a developing economy with great influence in the world. During the past two decades, China's intellectual property system has undergone very significant changes. Most past academic research has looked at the flow of FDI funds to diverse host populations from the perspective of industrialized home countries (e.g., the United States). In this paper, the effect of IPR protection intensity on FDI growth is analyzed theoretically and Granger causality is discussed. On the basis of Granger causality test, we conclude that IPR has a single-phase Granger causality with FDI, so we introduce gravitational model with panel data of 30 countries. These data cover a wider period of time from 1985 to 2009. We have also improved the method of IPR measurement and modified the GinartePark method used in traditional international research to make the empirical results more accurate. The empirical results show that strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights has a positive and significant impact on China in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI). The results also show that in addition to intellectual property rights, market size and regional integration, transport and transaction costs are also important determinants of FDI in China. In addition, this result is robust to any model and data sample segmentation. For example, no matter what kind of IPR policy is adopted, the positive effect of FDI from developed and developing countries on FDI is very significant. Overall, our results show that strengthening intellectual property rights in developing countries, especially in large developing economies, can play a positive role in attracting FDI and thus trigger technology transfer.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.6;F204

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李輝;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護與我國利用外資的相關(guān)性分析[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報);2008年02期

2 代中強;;實際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護、內(nèi)部化優(yōu)勢與FDI流入[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報);2010年04期

3 許春明;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護與外國直接投資:以O(shè)LI理論為基礎(chǔ)[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年11期

4 丁輝俠;馮宗憲;王青;;投資來源國的特定因素對中國FDI的影響——以多維度要素模型為基礎(chǔ)的實證分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2006年12期

5 黃肖琦;柴敏;;新經(jīng)濟地理學(xué)視角下的FDI區(qū)位選擇——基于中國省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];管理世界;2006年10期

6 武力超;范芹;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護、政治穩(wěn)定和出口自然資源稟賦——基于中低收入發(fā)展中國家FDI流入的考察[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2012年12期

，

本文編號：1971943