發(fā)布時間：2018-03-11 00:32

  本文選題：基金管理公司　切入點：績效評價指標體系　出處：《蘭州理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：自我國證券投資基金管理公司從1998年起步初的6家基金管理公司,發(fā)展到2012年末的70家基金管理公司,已經(jīng)具有了一定的規(guī)模。隨著近年來我國經(jīng)濟的迅速發(fā)展,我國的資本市場日趨成熟,證券投資基金行業(yè)也進入子快速發(fā)展階段�；鹗且环N較新的集合投資工具,已經(jīng)越來越廣泛的被大眾投資者認識和接受。目前我國對于基金的研究多數(shù)集中在基金的業(yè)績評價方面,從基金管理公司的角度出發(fā)進行的研究還較少,實際上基金管理公司是基金的直接操控者,決定著基金的投資決策,對基金的重要性毋庸置疑,基金管理公司的投資運營能力是決定所管理基金業(yè)績的重要因素,所以構建適合我國基金管理公司績效的評價體系非常有必要。因此,本文選擇了從基金管理公司的角度進行研究,構建基金管理公司績效評級體系并進行實證應用。 構建能夠科學全面的評價基金管理公司績效水平的指標體系對投資者選擇基金有重要的指導意義,投資者可以據(jù)此在不同的基金管理公司之中做出合理的選擇進而選擇基金,從而獲取盡可能大的收益。此外,為基金管理公司了解自身的優(yōu)勢和不足提供了參考依據(jù),從而為公司的長遠發(fā)展起到積極作用。從監(jiān)管部門的角度來看,可以據(jù)此制定相關政策,促進我國基金市場健康發(fā)展。 本文借鑒國內(nèi)外關于基金經(jīng)管理公司績效評價的相關研究,為了實現(xiàn)將不同規(guī)模的基金管理公司績效水平進行對比,選擇51家基金管理公司作為研究對象,以2008-2012年5年的相關數(shù)據(jù)為依據(jù)對我國基金管理公司績效評價體系進行構建,并對構建的指標體系進行了理論檢驗及實證檢驗,來驗證評價體系的科學性、全面性、適用性。其中基金管理公司績效評價體系的理論驗證采用了平衡計分卡理論,既考慮了績效評價體系的合理性,也考慮了績效評價體系的戰(zhàn)略性。通過因子分析法對我國基金管理公司的績效水平利用構建的評價體系進行實證研究,根據(jù)實證研究的結果,結合相關金融理論,聯(lián)系我國基金管理公司發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,做出合理解釋并提出自己的建議。
[Abstract]:Since China's securities investment fund management company started from 6 fund management companies in 1998 to 70 fund management companies in end of 2012, it has already had a certain scale. With the rapid development of China's economy in recent years, The capital market of our country is maturing day by day, and the securities investment fund industry has also entered the stage of rapid development. The fund is a relatively new collective investment tool. At present, most of the research on the fund in China is focused on the performance evaluation of the fund, but the research from the perspective of the fund management company is still less. In fact, the fund management company is the direct controller of the fund, which determines the investment decision of the fund. There is no doubt that the importance to the fund is that the investment and operation ability of the fund management company is an important factor in determining the performance of the fund under management. Therefore, it is very necessary to construct a performance evaluation system suitable for fund management companies in China. Therefore, this paper chooses to study from the perspective of fund management companies, to construct performance rating system of fund management companies and to carry out empirical application. The establishment of a scientific and comprehensive evaluation index system for the performance of fund management companies has important guiding significance for investors to select funds, investors can make reasonable choices among different fund management companies and then select funds. In addition, it provides a reference for fund management companies to understand their own advantages and disadvantages, thus playing a positive role in the long-term development of the company. Can make relevant policy accordingly, promote our country fund market to develop healthily. In order to compare the performance level of fund management companies of different scales, 51 fund management companies are selected as the research objects in this paper, based on the relevant research on performance evaluation of fund management companies at home and abroad. Based on the relevant data of five years from 2008 to 2012, this paper constructs the performance evaluation system of fund management companies in China, and makes theoretical and empirical tests on the index system to verify the scientific and comprehensive nature of the evaluation system. The theory of balanced scorecard is used to verify the performance evaluation system of fund management companies, and the rationality of the performance evaluation system is considered. Also considered the strategy of the performance evaluation system. Through the factor analysis of the performance evaluation system of fund management companies in China, based on the results of the empirical research, combined with the relevant financial theory, According to the current situation of fund management companies in China, this paper makes a reasonable explanation and puts forward its own suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F272.5;F832.39

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 魏明 ,楊仲偉;構建我國企業(yè)非財務績效評價體系的思考[J];財會月刊;2004年14期

2 何杰;楊丹;;什么影響著中國基金管理公司的投資業(yè)績[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2010年01期

3 周文和;;從業(yè)績對比看基金公司股權結構的多元化趨勢[J];成人高教學刊;2006年04期

4 劉文鵬;;業(yè)績評論新領域——非財務性業(yè)績評價系統(tǒng)[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)財會;1998年07期

5 孫世敏,趙希男;企業(yè)績效的社會評價與政策建議[J];當代財經(jīng);2005年07期

6 趙雯;企業(yè)經(jīng)營綜合評價指標體系研究[J];當代財經(jīng);1995年05期

7 曾德明;查琦;龔紅;;基金特征、管理特性與基金績效關系的實證研究[J];管理學報;2006年03期

8 胡季英;馮英浚;;經(jīng)營者業(yè)績評價與企業(yè)業(yè)績評價的關系及實證研究[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2005年12期

9 徐靜,任佩瑜,張新華;基于價值創(chuàng)造的戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟動因分析[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2003年01期

10 鄒穎;;我國國有企業(yè)績效評價演進綜述[J];會計師;2007年12期

，

本文編號：1595810