本文選題：FDI　切入點(diǎn)：外溢　出處：《商業(yè)研究》2011年04期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：理論研究認(rèn)為國(guó)際貿(mào)易和FDI可以通過(guò)示范/模仿、勞動(dòng)力流動(dòng)、出口、競(jìng)爭(zhēng),以及MNEs與東道國(guó)企業(yè)之間前向和后向關(guān)聯(lián)等五種渠道產(chǎn)生生產(chǎn)率外溢效應(yīng),而技術(shù)差距及東道國(guó)吸收能力、區(qū)域效應(yīng)、東道國(guó)企業(yè)特征、FDI特性和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平等又是影響是否有外溢效應(yīng)及效應(yīng)大小的幾類(lèi)典型因素。問(wèn)題是在這些渠道中發(fā)揮作用的因素及因素之間的影響方向此消彼長(zhǎng),使得總體效應(yīng)具有明顯地不確定性,理論模型也因此從一般均衡分析向局部均衡分析發(fā)展,但一般性外溢機(jī)制仍然是未解之謎。因此,更加微觀的行業(yè)、地區(qū)分析和實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)或許才是未來(lái)的方向。
[Abstract]:Theoretical studies suggest that international trade and FDI can produce productivity spillover effects through five channels: demonstration / imitation, labor mobility, export, competition, and forward and backward linkages between MNEs and host country firms. While the technology gap and host country absorptive capacity, regional effects, The characteristics of host country enterprises, such as the characteristics of FDI and the level of economic development, are some typical factors that influence the spillover effect and the magnitude of the effect. The problem is that the factors that play a role in these channels and the direction of influence between them rise and fall one after another. As a result of the uncertainty of the overall effect and the development of the theoretical model from general equilibrium analysis to local equilibrium analysis, the general spillover mechanism remains a mystery. Regional analysis and empirical testing may be the future direction.
【作者單位】： 重慶三峽學(xué)院經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目《貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義背景下反傾銷(xiāo)應(yīng)急體系建設(shè)研究》,項(xiàng)目編號(hào):09BJY012 重慶市社科規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目《重慶市發(fā)展內(nèi)陸開(kāi)放型經(jīng)濟(jì)的動(dòng)力機(jī)制研究》,項(xiàng)目編號(hào):2009JJ33 重慶三峽學(xué)院科研支撐計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F224;F832.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1589446