本文關鍵詞：我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險監(jiān)管研究　出處：《華南理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 商業(yè)銀行 流動性風險 銀行監(jiān)管

【摘要】：流動性風險是商業(yè)銀行所面臨的最致命風險，，也是各類風險最終的表現(xiàn)形式。此次全球金融危機的爆發(fā)表明，商業(yè)銀行流動性風險的隱蔽性、傳染性、疊加性和親周期特征均有所增強。在極端壓力事件下，流動性可以從過剩狀態(tài)迅速逆轉(zhuǎn)為全面緊縮，即使是資本充足、各項指標均達到監(jiān)管標準的銀行，也可能發(fā)生嚴重的流動性風險。伴隨此輪危機不斷深化，國際監(jiān)管組織及主要國家地區(qū)的監(jiān)管當局都對商業(yè)銀行流動性風險管理與監(jiān)管進行了深入反思，出臺了新的流動性風險監(jiān)管框架和指標要求。 本文從流動性風險的基礎理論出發(fā)，概述了商業(yè)銀行流動性風險的成因、分類、主要特征和管理理念變遷，以及國際流動性風險監(jiān)管改革動向。同時，對2010年至2012年這3個年度我國主要商業(yè)銀行、四個類型銀行機構(gòu)的流動性風險監(jiān)管指標進行了測算分析，認為主要商業(yè)銀行的流動性管理總體穩(wěn)健，近期發(fā)生流動性風險的幾率不高，但仍存在一些流動性風險隱患，由于存款波動加劇和“活期化”、“理財化”趨勢明顯，銀行更多通過資金批發(fā)市場實施主動負債，負債穩(wěn)定性有所下降，同時中長期貸款占比上升，平臺和房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)貸款集中度偏高，存在資產(chǎn)配置過度集中問題。從不同類型銀行看，國有大型銀行、股份制銀行、城市商業(yè)銀行、農(nóng)村商業(yè)銀行由于在經(jīng)營理念、業(yè)務模式、融資渠道、資產(chǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)等方面存在差異，流動性管理水平和風險狀況也有所不同。從監(jiān)管指標測算看，國有大型銀行、城市商業(yè)銀行、農(nóng)村商業(yè)銀行的流動性風險尚不顯著，而股份制銀行有效管理流動性面臨的壓力最大，一旦經(jīng)濟持續(xù)處于下行區(qū)間，銀行壞賬大面積暴露或市場流動性因突發(fā)事件出現(xiàn)嚴重緊縮，將可能直接觸發(fā)個別股份制銀行的流動性風險暴露。 為提高我國商業(yè)銀行流動性風險預判的敏感度和前瞻性，本文借鑒國際監(jiān)管改革研究成果，進一步完善我國流動性監(jiān)管指標體系。對5個主要流動性風險監(jiān)管指標，運用主成份分析法，構(gòu)建了“主要商業(yè)銀行流動性風險監(jiān)管綜合指數(shù)”和“城市商業(yè)銀行流動性監(jiān)管綜合指數(shù)”，分別用于評價我國主要商業(yè)銀行、地方中小法人銀行的總體流動性風險狀況。同時，對我國現(xiàn)行的流動性監(jiān)管指標體系進行補充修正，提出流動性監(jiān)管的其它配套政策，以提高流動性風險監(jiān)管有效性，具有重要意義。
[Abstract]:Liquidity risk is the most fatal risk faced by commercial banks, and it is also the ultimate manifestation of all kinds of risks. The outbreak of the global financial crisis shows that the liquidity risk of commercial banks is hidden and infectious. In extreme stress events, liquidity can quickly reverse from excess to across-the-board tightening, even if capital is sufficient and all indicators meet regulatory standards. With the deepening of the crisis, international regulatory organizations and regulatory authorities in major countries have made a thorough reflection on the liquidity risk management and supervision of commercial banks. Introduced a new regulatory framework for liquidity risk and indicators requirements. Based on the basic theory of liquidity risk, this paper summarizes the causes, classification, main characteristics and changes of management concepts of liquidity risk of commercial banks, as well as the trend of international liquidity risk supervision reform. From 2010 to 2012, this paper calculates and analyzes the liquidity risk supervision index of the main commercial banks and four types of banking institutions in China. It is considered that the liquidity management of major commercial banks is generally sound and the probability of liquidity risk is not high in the near future, but there are still some hidden risks of liquidity risk, due to the intensification of deposit fluctuation and "demand". "financing" trend is obvious, banks more through the wholesale capital market to implement active debt, debt stability has declined, while the proportion of medium and long-term loans increased, the platform and real estate industry loan concentration is on the high side. From different types of banks, large state-owned banks, joint-stock banks, urban commercial banks, rural commercial banks due to business philosophy, business models, financing channels. There are differences in asset structure, liquidity management level and risk status. From the indicators of supervision, the liquidity risk of large state-owned banks, urban commercial banks and rural commercial banks is not significant. Stock banks face the greatest pressure to manage liquidity effectively. Once the economy continues to be in a downward range, banks' bad loans are exposed in large areas or market liquidity is severely tightened due to unexpected events. It will be possible to directly trigger the exposure to liquidity risk of individual joint-stock banks. In order to improve the sensitivity and foresight of liquidity risk prediction of commercial banks in China, this paper draws lessons from the research results of international regulatory reform. Further improve China's liquidity supervision index system. For the five main liquidity risk monitoring indicators, the principal component analysis method is used. The main commercial banks' liquidity risk supervision index and the city commercial bank liquidity supervision comprehensive index are constructed to evaluate the main commercial banks in China respectively. At the same time, the current liquidity supervision index system of our country is supplemented and revised, and other supporting policies of liquidity supervision are put forward. It is of great significance to improve the effectiveness of liquidity risk supervision.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.33

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉雯;張妍;昃偉;;商業(yè)銀行流動性風險評估與管理[J];當代經(jīng)濟;2010年17期

2 王飛;;當前國際上商業(yè)銀行流動性風險的變化與監(jiān)管趨勢[J];南方金融;2011年01期

3 王兆星;;國際銀行監(jiān)管改革對我國銀行業(yè)的影響[J];國際金融研究;2010年03期

4 張曉樸;;系統(tǒng)性金融風險研究:演進、成因與監(jiān)管[J];國際金融研究;2010年07期

5 倪志凌;;動機扭曲和資產(chǎn)證券化的微觀審慎監(jiān)管——基于美國數(shù)據(jù)的實證研究[J];國際金融研究;2011年08期

6 廖岷;楊元元;;全球商業(yè)銀行流動性風險管理與監(jiān)管的發(fā)展狀況及其啟示[J];金融研究;2008年06期

7 彭建剛;童磊;黃向陽;;國際銀行業(yè)流動性風險監(jiān)管的新動向[J];經(jīng)濟縱橫;2012年09期

8 林穎;關小虎;;解讀巴塞爾流動性風險監(jiān)管新指標[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2012年31期

9 巴曙松;王茜;王t熲

本文編號：1403379