【摘要】：現(xiàn)代意義上破產(chǎn),除了破產(chǎn)清算制度,還包括以挽救債務(wù)人、預(yù)防破產(chǎn)為目的的重整、和解等法律制度。破產(chǎn)重整制度作為公司破產(chǎn)制度的重要組成部分,至1929年首先在英國確立以來,己為世界上多數(shù)市場經(jīng)濟(jì)國家采用。我國2007年實(shí)施的《企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》(下稱新破產(chǎn)法)新增破產(chǎn)重整制度,應(yīng)用日益廣泛,對供電企業(yè)生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營的影響日益突出。破產(chǎn)重整電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)是隨破產(chǎn)重整制度實(shí)施而產(chǎn)生的新課題。“先用電、后交費(fèi)”的模式,導(dǎo)致企業(yè)被裁定進(jìn)入破產(chǎn)重整程序后,必然有一定數(shù)量的電費(fèi)未結(jié)算,這一部分電費(fèi)就屬于破產(chǎn)重整電費(fèi)債權(quán)。電費(fèi)結(jié)算的非及時(shí)性使供電企業(yè)長期面臨系統(tǒng)性的電費(fèi)回收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。本文考慮企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整與電網(wǎng)企業(yè)電費(fèi)回收“及時(shí)、足額、安全”的“相對矛盾”問題,首先梳理了國內(nèi)外破產(chǎn)重整、電費(fèi)債權(quán)的相關(guān)理論,闡述了破產(chǎn)重整案件的概況及在浙江的衍生發(fā)展,根據(jù)破產(chǎn)重整的特點(diǎn)分析了其對電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)的影響。其次,針對破產(chǎn)重整啟動期間、計(jì)劃制訂與通過期間、計(jì)劃實(shí)施期間等全流程的三個(gè)階段,基于企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整適用對象、申請發(fā)起主體、電費(fèi)債權(quán)申報(bào)、電費(fèi)債權(quán)分組、電費(fèi)債權(quán)“表決權(quán)”、重整計(jì)劃典型類型、重整計(jì)劃實(shí)施期間的供用電合同履行等要素導(dǎo)致的電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)的主要問題,分別提出了問題解決的方案建議。然后,基于擔(dān)保權(quán)行使最大化、重整計(jì)劃關(guān)鍵條款兩個(gè)角度,又提出了破產(chǎn)重整電費(fèi)擔(dān)保債權(quán)保護(hù)問題的解決建議,并形成了相關(guān)重點(diǎn)法條規(guī)定清單,同時(shí)還提出了通過應(yīng)用電費(fèi)銀行履約保函,解決破產(chǎn)重整電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)問題的建議。最后,通過對企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整、大企業(yè)“類司法重整”、關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)“類司法重整”等典型實(shí)例中的電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)分析,并借鑒銀行對同類法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)處置的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出了針對不同類型企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)的解決方案。本文以當(dāng)前國內(nèi)外經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢下,不斷有大中型企業(yè)進(jìn)入破產(chǎn)環(huán)節(jié)為背景,結(jié)合破產(chǎn)重整制度的種種特征,將普通電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)、擔(dān)保電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)和公益電費(fèi)債權(quán)保護(hù)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管控,形成一套行之有效的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管控體系,為基層供電公司在電費(fèi)回收方面提供參考。
[Abstract]:Bankruptcy in modern sense, in addition to bankruptcy liquidation system, but also includes the purpose of saving the debtor, prevention of bankruptcy reorganization, reconciliation and other legal systems. As an important part of corporate bankruptcy system, bankruptcy reorganization system has been adopted by most market economy countries since it was first established in England in 1929. The new bankruptcy reorganization system implemented in China in 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the new bankruptcy law) has become increasingly widely used and has an increasingly prominent impact on the production and operation of power supply enterprises. The protection of tariff claims in bankruptcy reorganization is a new subject arising from the implementation of bankruptcy reorganization system. The mode of "use electricity first, then pay fees" results in the enterprise being ruled into bankruptcy reorganization procedure, there must be a certain amount of electricity bill not settled, and this part of electricity price belongs to the creditor's right of bankruptcy reorganization tariff. The non-timely settlement of electricity charges makes power supply enterprises face systematic risk of electricity recovery for a long time. Considering the "relative contradiction" between enterprise bankruptcy reorganization and electricity recovery of power grid enterprises, this paper firstly combs the related theories of domestic and foreign bankruptcy reorganization and power tariff creditor's rights. This paper expounds the general situation of bankruptcy reorganization case and its derivative development in Zhejiang Province, and analyzes its influence on the protection of electricity power claims according to the characteristics of bankruptcy reorganization. Secondly, according to the three stages of the whole process, such as the period of the bankruptcy reorganization, the period of plan formulation and adoption, the period of the implementation of the plan, based on the applicable object of bankruptcy reorganization of the enterprise, the main body of the application, the declaration of the claim on electricity bill, the grouping of the credit on electricity, The main problems in the protection of electricity claims caused by the factors such as "voting rights", typical types of reorganization plans, and the fulfillment of power supply contracts during the implementation of the reorganization plans are put forward respectively. Then, based on the maximization of the exercise of the security right and the key provisions of the reorganization plan, the paper puts forward some suggestions to solve the problem of the protection of the secured claims of the electricity bill in bankruptcy reorganization, and forms a list of relevant key provisions. At the same time, the paper puts forward some suggestions on how to solve the problem of the protection of tariff claims through the application of electricity bill bank performance guarantee. Finally, by analyzing the typical examples of enterprise bankruptcy reorganization, large enterprise "quasi-judicial reorganization" and affiliated enterprise "quasi-judicial reorganization", the paper analyzes the protection of electricity claims, and draws lessons from the successful experiences of banks in dealing with similar legal risks. This paper puts forward a solution to the protection of tariff claims for different types of enterprises. Based on the current domestic and international economic situation, large and medium-sized enterprises enter the bankruptcy link as the background, combined with the various characteristics of the bankruptcy restructuring system, ordinary electricity claims will be protected. In order to provide reference for the basic power supply companies in the recovery of electricity charges, a set of effective risk control system has been formed through the detailed risk control of the protection of secured tariff claims and the protection of public interest electricity claims.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)(北京)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426.61;F406.7;F832.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱淦祥;;電力營銷全過程電費(fèi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理的相關(guān)思考[J];科技展望;2017年02期

2 錢軍;;淺談電費(fèi)回收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與防范措施[J];電工文摘;2016年06期

3 中國人民銀行溫州市中心支行課題組;周智;;民營企業(yè)破產(chǎn)中金融債權(quán)保護(hù)的法律思考——以溫州為例[J];浙江金融;2016年12期

4 嚴(yán)玲娟;;電力營銷全過程電費(fèi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理問題的相關(guān)探討[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2016年34期

5 朱黎;華碧瓊;;破產(chǎn)重整中浮動抵押權(quán)人權(quán)利保護(hù)問題研究[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2016年11期

6 魏玉芳;司洪波;李明;;電力營銷過程中的電費(fèi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理[J];企業(yè)改革與管理;2016年20期

7 袁相國;;國際承包工程中常用銀行保函總論[J];招標(biāo)與投標(biāo);2016年11期

8 楊海;;我國破產(chǎn)重整程序?qū)τ袚?dān)保債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)存在的問題及對策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2016年11期

9 楊海;;我國破產(chǎn)重整程序中有擔(dān)保債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的規(guī)制[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2016年10期

10 郁琳;;關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)整體重整的規(guī)制[J];人民司法(應(yīng)用);2016年28期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 孟飛;;破產(chǎn)重整應(yīng)保護(hù)好債權(quán)人利益[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日報(bào);2016年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 梁婧;破產(chǎn)重整程序中債權(quán)人的權(quán)利沖突與平衡研究[D];云南大學(xué);2016年

2 張孟凱;破產(chǎn)重整制度下債權(quán)人知情權(quán)研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2016年

3 徐麗;企業(yè)重整中擔(dān)保債權(quán)人權(quán)利的保護(hù)與限制[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

4 顏鴻藝;破產(chǎn)重整中債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)案例分析報(bào)告[D];貴州大學(xué);2016年

5 羅爽;我國企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整信息披露法律問題研究[D];西南大學(xué);2016年

6 王志永;股東申請公司強(qiáng)制清算中的債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：2268934