本文選題：“綠電” + “火電”��； 參考：《中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,在能源安全和環(huán)境污染的雙重壓力下,調(diào)整我國以化石能源為主的能源結(jié)構(gòu),大力發(fā)展清潔能源已經(jīng)成為高度共識(shí)�！熬G電”作為清潔能源開發(fā)利用的最主要形式,在能源調(diào)整過程中扮演著越來越重要的角色。然而,近年來“綠電”發(fā)展過程中存在著開發(fā)緩慢、核心技術(shù)缺乏和政策選擇等問題,不禁使人們疑惑“綠電”能否在既定時(shí)間和規(guī)模內(nèi)完成對(duì)“火電”的替代,“綠電”替代“火電”的最優(yōu)替代又該如何選擇。為了對(duì)這些問題做出科學(xué)判斷,在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,需要對(duì)我國“綠電”替代“火電”問題展開更進(jìn)行深層次研究討論。因此,本文運(yùn)用創(chuàng)新擴(kuò)散模型和福利優(yōu)化模型,分別從“替代進(jìn)程”與“替代潛力”兩種視角對(duì)電力替代問題進(jìn)行了耦合分析。首先,考慮到“綠電”發(fā)展過程對(duì)技術(shù)依賴性較強(qiáng)這一原因,本文借助了主要反映技術(shù)性能對(duì)產(chǎn)品發(fā)展有重要影響作用的創(chuàng)新擴(kuò)散模型對(duì)電力市場(chǎng)的擴(kuò)散過程進(jìn)行描述。明確了“綠電”擴(kuò)散過程中的重要時(shí)點(diǎn)及各階段的時(shí)間跨度,結(jié)合我國“綠電”發(fā)展的實(shí)際情況,對(duì)“綠電”發(fā)展過程進(jìn)行了階段劃分,結(jié)果顯示:當(dāng)前,我國水電已經(jīng)處于商業(yè)化發(fā)展階段,風(fēng)電和二代核電也已處于產(chǎn)業(yè)化發(fā)展階段,而三代核電還處于項(xiàng)目示范階段。對(duì)“綠電”的階段劃分和各階段發(fā)展特征的詳細(xì)描述與分析,為政府各階段的自身角色定位和各階段電力政策的制定提供了理論依據(jù)。其次,在擴(kuò)散預(yù)測(cè)基礎(chǔ)上,通過對(duì)發(fā)電能源未來各時(shí)點(diǎn)發(fā)電量及最大潛在發(fā)電量的預(yù)測(cè)評(píng)估得出:未來一段時(shí)間內(nèi),我國仍將以“火電”為主,“綠電”作為電力市場(chǎng)的重要補(bǔ)充,將發(fā)揮越來越重要的作用。水電和核電作為“綠電”最主要來源,開發(fā)速度相對(duì)緩慢。在技術(shù)層面對(duì)電力替代規(guī)模進(jìn)行分析基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步從現(xiàn)實(shí)層面出發(fā),將人們普遍關(guān)注的環(huán)境問題考慮在內(nèi),構(gòu)建了包含“環(huán)境成本”的電力系統(tǒng)社會(huì)福利優(yōu)化模型。通過對(duì)比分析加入“環(huán)境成本”前后使社會(huì)福利最大化的各能源發(fā)電量得出:加入“環(huán)境成本”之前,在水電和核電滿發(fā)的基礎(chǔ)上,煤電發(fā)電量越多,電力系統(tǒng)社會(huì)福利越大;加入“環(huán)境成本”之后,“綠電”發(fā)電量越多,電力系統(tǒng)社會(huì)福利越大;最后,針對(duì)“綠電”替代“火電”過程中的存在的問題,給出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:At present, under the dual pressure of energy security and environmental pollution, it has become a high consensus to adjust the energy structure based on fossil energy and vigorously develop clean energy. Green electricity, as the main form of clean energy development and utilization, plays a more and more important role in the process of energy adjustment. However, in recent years, there are some problems such as slow development, lack of core technology and policy choice in the development of "green power", which makes people doubt whether "green power" can be replaced by "thermal power" within a given time and scale. How to choose the best substitution of green electricity instead of thermal power? In order to make a scientific judgment on these problems, on the basis of previous studies, it is necessary to carry out deeper research and discussion on the substitution of "green electricity" for "thermal power" in our country. Therefore, by using innovation diffusion model and welfare optimization model, this paper analyzes the power substitution problem from the perspectives of "substitution process" and "substitution potential", respectively. Firstly, considering the strong dependence of green electricity on technology, this paper describes the diffusion process of electricity market with the help of innovation diffusion model, which mainly reflects the influence of technical performance on product development. The important time points and the time span of each stage in the process of "green electricity" diffusion are defined. According to the actual situation of the development of "green electricity" in China, the development process of "green electricity" is divided into stages. The results show that: at present, Hydropower in China is in the stage of commercial development, wind power and second-generation nuclear power are also in the stage of industrialization development, and the third generation of nuclear power is still in the stage of project demonstration. The detailed description and analysis of the stage division and development characteristics of "Green Power" provide a theoretical basis for the role orientation of each stage of the government and the formulation of power policy in each stage. Secondly, on the basis of diffusion prediction, it is concluded that thermal power will still be the main source of power generation in China for some time to come, through the prediction and evaluation of power generation and maximum potential power generation at various points in the future. "Green electricity" as an important supplement to the electricity market, will play an increasingly important role. Hydropower and nuclear power as the main source of green electricity, the pace of development is relatively slow. On the basis of analyzing the scale of electric power substitution from the technical level, and considering the environmental problems that people pay close attention to, the optimization model of power system social welfare including "environmental cost" is constructed. Through comparative analysis of the energy generation before and after joining "environmental cost" to maximize social welfare, it is concluded that before adding "environmental cost", on the basis of full generation of hydropower and nuclear power, the more coal power generation, the greater the social welfare of power system; After the introduction of "environmental cost", the more green electricity is generated, the greater the social welfare of power system is. Finally, some policy suggestions are given to solve the problems existing in the process of "green electricity" replacing "thermal power".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F426.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林衛(wèi)斌;蘇劍;;理解供給側(cè)改革:能源視角[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2015年12期

2 聶煈;呂濤;;考慮環(huán)境成本的燃煤發(fā)電與光伏發(fā)電成本比較研究[J];中國人口·資源與環(huán)境;2015年11期

3 肖文海;董安平;魏偉;;可再生能源替代化石能源的價(jià)格政策選擇[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年02期

4 ;積極推動(dòng)我國能源生產(chǎn)和消費(fèi)革命 國家主席習(xí)近平在中央財(cái)經(jīng)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組第六次會(huì)議上的講話摘錄[J];上海節(jié)能;2014年07期

5 徐蔚莉;李亞楠;王華君;;燃煤火電與風(fēng)電完全成本比較分析[J];風(fēng)能;2014年06期

6 周雅;李永平;黃國和;;深圳市可持續(xù)電力規(guī)劃模型及節(jié)能減排分析[J];電力建設(shè);2014年06期

7 閆慶友;湯新發(fā);;核電資源替代煤電資源的臨界時(shí)點(diǎn)分析模型[J];運(yùn)籌與管理;2013年05期

8 劉嘉;段茂盛;張建宇;楊帆;;基于EPPAC模型的非化石能源發(fā)展情景[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2013年09期

9 袁曉玲;范玉仙;;基于Logistic和學(xué)習(xí)曲線模型的中國電源結(jié)構(gòu)預(yù)測(cè)[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

10 曹冬梅;;我國SO_2污染、危害及控制技術(shù)[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)導(dǎo)刊;2013年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 ;中共中央國務(wù)院關(guān)于進(jìn)一步深化電力體制改革的若干意見[A];中國農(nóng)機(jī)工業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)風(fēng)能設(shè)備分會(huì)《風(fēng)能產(chǎn)業(yè)》（2015年第4期）[C];2015年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 何勇健;;“十三五”電力規(guī)劃應(yīng)強(qiáng)調(diào)系統(tǒng)優(yōu)化[N];中國能源報(bào);2015年

2 ;我國水電開發(fā)程度的表述要與國際接軌[N];大眾科技報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張海龍;中國新能源發(fā)展研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

2 高新宇;北京市可再生能源綜合規(guī)劃模型與政策研究[D];北京工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

3 陳漢利;中國電力結(jié)構(gòu)及其市場(chǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2011年

4 栗寶卿;促進(jìn)可再生能源發(fā)展的財(cái)稅政策研究[D];財(cái)政部財(cái)政科學(xué)研究所;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 趙艷;天然氣發(fā)電的經(jīng)濟(jì)性研究[D];華北電力大學(xué)(北京);2016年

2 唐成;基于全成本的煤電企業(yè)成本效益分析[D];華北電力大學(xué);2013年

3 方言;新建風(fēng)力發(fā)電項(xiàng)目成本分析與競(jìng)價(jià)機(jī)制研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2005939