基于國際分工視角的我國制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級的研究
本文選題:制造業(yè) 切入點:國際分工 出處:《南京師范大學》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:制造業(yè)是國民經(jīng)濟的支柱,是一國的立國之本。隨著我國制造業(yè)參與國際分工越來越頻繁,制造業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)升級一直成為學術界研究的熱點問題。近年來,各國紛紛重視本國制造業(yè)的回歸。對于制造業(yè)融入全球價值鏈,提升制造業(yè)的水平,實現(xiàn)制造業(yè)的轉型升級,是各國都關心的話題。那么,我國制造業(yè)在參與國際分工時,會對制造業(yè)本身產(chǎn)生什么樣的影響?這種影響又是如何作用于制造業(yè)升級的?我國制造業(yè)未來的轉型升級路徑又如何?本文通過對參與國際分工的理論與產(chǎn)業(yè)升級的理論進行整合分析,從增加值的角度入手,利用投入產(chǎn)出法計算出制造業(yè)在參與國際分工時所創(chuàng)造的國內(nèi)增加值,進一步衡量制造業(yè)在全球價值鏈中的地位和作用。文章首先基于被困因素模型、替代性創(chuàng)新模型以及組合模型等制造業(yè)參與國際分工的理論模型和產(chǎn)業(yè)升級理論,對制造業(yè)參與國際分工對制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級進行理論層面的分析;其次,基于上述理論模型和理論基礎,計算我國制造業(yè)參與國際分工產(chǎn)生的國內(nèi)增加值的數(shù)據(jù),并且與世界上主要發(fā)達經(jīng)濟體和發(fā)展中經(jīng)濟體進行橫向比較分析,同時確定影響制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級的主要因素包括垂直專業(yè)化水平、勞動生產(chǎn)率、全要素生產(chǎn)率、固定資本投入以及出口依存度;接下來文章通過建立兩個方程,從增加值和垂直專業(yè)化水平兩個角度,利用面板數(shù)據(jù)模型分別考察2000-2014年制造業(yè)在參與國際分工時對產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)和產(chǎn)業(yè)間升級的影響;谏鲜龇治,本文得出的主要結論是:第一,制造業(yè)參與國際分工促進了產(chǎn)業(yè)間升級。然而,對于要素密集度不同的制造業(yè),其參與國際分工對其制造業(yè)本身的升級影響程度不同,對勞動密集型行業(yè)的影響程度要大于資本密集型和資本技術密集型行業(yè)。第二,制造業(yè)參與國際分工對產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)升級的作用不明顯。在不區(qū)分制造業(yè)類型的情況下,垂直專業(yè)化水平對于制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)升級的影響作用的顯著的,但是制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率對產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)升級的影響與預期符號相反。第三,綜合制造業(yè)參與國際分工影響產(chǎn)業(yè)間和產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)兩種產(chǎn)業(yè)升級路徑來看,制造業(yè)在參與國際分工時,由于制造業(yè)本身行業(yè)性質的差異,對于產(chǎn)業(yè)升級的影響程度也不同。針對上述結論,本文的政策建議為:加快勞動密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)向中西部及其他地區(qū)轉移的步伐。加強我國制造業(yè)的技術創(chuàng)新和自主研發(fā)能力,推動高端制造業(yè)的發(fā)展。減少對出口貿(mào)易的依賴程度,擴大國內(nèi)需求。努力提高職工技術熟練程度以及提升企業(yè)管理水平,提高全員勞動生產(chǎn)率。
[Abstract]:Manufacturing industry is the pillar of national economy and the foundation of a country. With the increasing participation of manufacturing industry in international division of labor in China, the industrial upgrading of manufacturing industry has been a hot issue in academic circles in recent years. Many countries attach importance to the return of their manufacturing industries. It is a topic of concern to all countries to integrate manufacturing into the global value chain, to raise the level of manufacturing industry and to realize the transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industries. So, when China's manufacturing industry participates in the international division of labor, What impact will it have on manufacturing itself? How does this impact affect manufacturing upgrading? What is the path of the future transformation and upgrading of China's manufacturing industry? By integrating the theory of participating in international division of labor and the theory of industrial upgrading, this paper calculates the domestic added value of manufacturing industry when participating in international division of labor by using input-output method, starting from the angle of added value. First of all, based on the model of trapped factors, alternative innovation model and combination model, this paper analyzes the role of manufacturing industry in the international division of labor and the theory of industrial upgrading. Secondly, based on the above theoretical model and theoretical basis, the domestic added value of China's manufacturing industry participating in the international division of labor is calculated. And through horizontal comparative analysis with the major developed and developing economies in the world, it is determined that the main factors affecting the upgrading of manufacturing industries include vertical specialization level, labor productivity, total factor productivity. Fixed capital input and the degree of export dependence; next, by establishing two equations, from the perspective of added value and vertical specialization level, The panel data model is used to examine the impact of manufacturing industry participation in international division of labor on intra-industry and inter-industry upgrading from 2000 to 2014. Based on the above analysis, the main conclusions of this paper are as follows: first, However, for the manufacturing industry with different factor intensity, its participation in the international division of labor has different impact on the upgrading of its manufacturing industry itself. The impact on labor-intensive industries is greater than that on capital-intensive and capital-technology-intensive industries. Second, the participation of manufacturing in international division of labor does not play a significant role in intra-industry upgrading. The effect of vertical specialization level on intra-industry upgrading of manufacturing industry is significant, but the impact of total factor productivity of manufacturing industry on intra-industry upgrading is contrary to the expected symbol. Third, Comprehensive manufacturing participation in the international division of labor affects both inter-industry and intra-industry upgrading paths. When the manufacturing industry participates in the international division of labor, the nature of the manufacturing industry itself is different. In view of the above conclusions, the policy recommendations of this paper are to speed up the transfer of labor-intensive industries to the central and western regions and other regions, and to strengthen the technological innovation and independent R & D capabilities of China's manufacturing industry. To promote the development of high-end manufacturing industry, reduce the dependence on export trade, expand domestic demand, and strive to improve the technical proficiency of workers and enterprise management, and improve the overall labor productivity.
【學位授予單位】:南京師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F424
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 陳琳;朱明瑞;;對外直接投資對中國產(chǎn)業(yè)結構升級的實證研究:基于產(chǎn)業(yè)間和產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)升級的檢驗[J];當代經(jīng)濟科學;2015年06期
2 張彬;桑百川;;中國制造業(yè)參與國際分工對升級的影響與升級路徑選擇——基于出口垂直專業(yè)化視角的研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究;2015年05期
3 黎峰;;全球價值鏈分工下的雙邊貿(mào)易收益核算:以中美貿(mào)易為例[J];南方經(jīng)濟;2015年08期
4 衛(wèi)瑞;張文城;張少軍;;全球價值鏈視角下中國增加值出口及其影響因素[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟技術經(jīng)濟研究;2015年07期
5 劉琳;;中國參與全球價值鏈的測度與分析——基于附加值貿(mào)易的考察[J];世界經(jīng)濟研究;2015年06期
6 拓曉瑞;左連村;;基于增加值核算的我國出口產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力分析[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2015年06期
7 夏明;張紅霞;;增加值貿(mào)易測算:概念與方法辨析[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2015年06期
8 李文秀;姚洋洋;;要素比例、技術差異與出口增加值——基于中美兩國雙邊貿(mào)易出口的實證研究[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2015年06期
9 劉維林;;中國式出口的價值創(chuàng)造之謎:基于全球價值鏈的解析[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2015年03期
10 劉圣香;劉芳芳;;浙江省制造業(yè)升級的影響因素分析與對策建議——基于全球價值鏈視角[J];經(jīng)營與管理;2015年02期
,本文編號:1561306
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/gongshangguanlilunwen/1561306.html