【摘要】：專利權(quán)是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的重要組成部分。專利行政執(zhí)法是中國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)體系中極具中國特色的一項(xiàng)制度,該制度獨(dú)特之處在于專利管理機(jī)關(guān)有權(quán)直接執(zhí)法。當(dāng)前,隨著專利侵權(quán)案件的增加,越來越多的問題在專利行政執(zhí)法工作中暴露出來,“雙軌制”去留的爭論也逐漸喪失其在法律實(shí)務(wù)界和學(xué)術(shù)界研究領(lǐng)域的獨(dú)占地位。但是,對(duì)專利行政執(zhí)法體制的研究還不夠深入。 本文從我國專利行政執(zhí)法保護(hù)制度的法學(xué)概念出發(fā),分析其相關(guān)法律規(guī)定及其發(fā)展歷程,并對(duì)國外相關(guān)專利行政保護(hù)體制進(jìn)行研究與思考,通過對(duì)專利行政執(zhí)法現(xiàn)狀的分析,并以此為基礎(chǔ)對(duì)目前存在的法律問題提出完善建議。本文在導(dǎo)論部分厘清論文選題背景、研究意義、思路和方法及本文創(chuàng)新之處后,將分為四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述。 第一部分對(duì)專利行政執(zhí)法的概念予以界定,并就相關(guān)爭議進(jìn)行討論；第二部分對(duì)國內(nèi)外專利執(zhí)法體制進(jìn)行研究及思考,通過分析各國專利執(zhí)法制度的獨(dú)特之處,挖掘其與我國現(xiàn)行規(guī)定之間的差異：第三部分揭示我國專利行政執(zhí)法所存在的問題,包括執(zhí)法依據(jù)的不足、執(zhí)法工作在實(shí)踐中遇到的阻礙以及銜接配合機(jī)制不完善等方面；最后,針對(duì)存在的問題提出完善建言,主要從加強(qiáng)專利執(zhí)法權(quán)限及執(zhí)法效果、防止地方保護(hù)主義、完善專利執(zhí)法程序、執(zhí)法環(huán)境及司法銜接機(jī)制等六個(gè)方面提出了完善專利行政執(zhí)法制度的建議。
[Abstract]:Patent right is an important part of intellectual property rights. Patent administrative law enforcement is a system with Chinese characteristics in the administrative protection system of intellectual property rights in China. At present, with the increase of patent infringement cases, more and more problems have been exposed in patent administrative law enforcement, and the debate of "two-track system" has gradually lost its exclusive position in the field of legal practice and academic research. However, the study of patent administrative law enforcement system is not deep enough. Based on the legal concept of patent administrative law enforcement and protection system in China, this paper analyzes its relevant legal provisions and its development process, and studies and ponders the relevant patent administrative protection system in foreign countries, through the analysis of the current situation of patent administrative law enforcement. On this basis, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the existing legal problems. After the introduction part clarifies the background, research significance, ideas and methods of this paper and the innovation of this paper, it will be divided into four parts to discuss. The first part defines the concept of patent administrative law enforcement and discusses the related disputes. The second part studies and thinks about the patent law enforcement system at home and abroad, analyzes the uniqueness of the patent law enforcement system in various countries, and excavates the differences between it and the current regulations of our country. The third part reveals the problems existing in the patent administrative law enforcement in our country. Including the lack of basis for law enforcement, the obstacles encountered in the practice of law enforcement and the imperfect mechanism of convergence and cooperation, and so on. Finally, in view of the existing problems, this paper puts forward some suggestions for perfecting the patent law enforcement, mainly from strengthening the jurisdiction and effect of patent law enforcement, preventing local protectionism, and perfecting the procedures of patent law enforcement. This paper puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the patent administrative law enforcement system from six aspects, such as the law enforcement environment and the judicial connection mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42;D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧儀友;;美、日、韓三國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策評(píng)述[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2008年07期

2 莫于川;行政執(zhí)法監(jiān)督制度論要[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年01期

3 武善學(xué);;論我國專利權(quán)行政保護(hù)存在的問題及其完善[J];甘肅聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

4 張煒;;對(duì)日本政府打擊假冒商品的執(zhí)法工作考察的啟示[J];工商行政管理;2009年22期

5 王連昌,王學(xué)輝;析行政執(zhí)法的概念和基本原則[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

6 吳家慶;易曙光;;地方保護(hù)主義何以愈演愈烈[J];內(nèi)部文稿;1995年14期

7 李萌;輝瑞"狂言"再現(xiàn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)偏見——中國應(yīng)強(qiáng)化自我保護(hù)意識(shí)和手段[J];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2005年20期

8 鄭成思;中國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀與定位問題[J];今日中國論壇;2005年Z1期

9 李泰山;;我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)制度存續(xù)的必要性[J];蘇州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

10 李建峰;;英國的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)及其對(duì)我國的啟示[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2007年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 強(qiáng)志強(qiáng);;論我國專利行政執(zhí)法制度的完善[A];專利法研究（2010）[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 駐韓國使館經(jīng)商處;[N];國際商報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 盧小草;專利行政執(zhí)法研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 綦寶進(jìn);論專利權(quán)的行政保護(hù)[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2484780