【摘要】：信托、銀行、保險和證券，并稱為現(xiàn)代金融行業(yè)的四大支柱。專利作為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的重要組成部分，是知識經(jīng)濟(jì)時代國家發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略性資源和國際競爭力較量的核心要素。而專利信托作為一種在專利轉(zhuǎn)化領(lǐng)域創(chuàng)新運(yùn)用的新興投融資工具，一方面順應(yīng)了社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，使專利所具備的無限價值潛力和信托的杠桿優(yōu)勢強(qiáng)強(qiáng)聯(lián)合，充分體現(xiàn)了物盡其用；另一方面由于專利信托的新興性而無可避免的存在諸多風(fēng)險。專利信托蓬勃發(fā)展的可能性在一定程度上取決于風(fēng)險的控制防范。而通過法律制度的完善對風(fēng)險加以控制和化解，是縮小風(fēng)險范圍，，減少風(fēng)險損失，阻止風(fēng)險擴(kuò)散最有效的手段之一。 本文在介紹專利信托、專利信托風(fēng)險和我國專利信托法律制度的現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上，分析了專利信托風(fēng)險與法律控制的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系以及專利信托風(fēng)險法律控制的意義。著重探討了專利信托的主要風(fēng)險，包括利潤風(fēng)險、信用風(fēng)險以及操作風(fēng)險三個方面。專利侵權(quán)訴訟及無效對于成本的增加，不可預(yù)料的技術(shù)進(jìn)步對于專利價值的降低以及專利權(quán)在流動性上的缺陷是利潤風(fēng)險的主要原因；業(yè)界環(huán)境和監(jiān)管混亂導(dǎo)致專利信托信用風(fēng)險加大；信托公司缺乏完善的內(nèi)部控制制度以及專利信托缺乏相應(yīng)對口的人力資本則不可避免的造成了專利信托操作風(fēng)險。但是我國已初步具備專利信托法律風(fēng)險控制的基本制度和實(shí)踐參考，也就意味著對于專利信托風(fēng)險法律控制的討論有了可行性和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義，從而提出了完善專利信托風(fēng)險法律控制的具體措施。專利信托設(shè)立階段風(fēng)險控制法律措施的完善主要包括專利價值評估環(huán)節(jié)的建立，專利信托登記公示制度的細(xì)化，健全相關(guān)信息的披露制度；運(yùn)行階段風(fēng)險控制法律措施的完善主要包括政府監(jiān)管模式的改革，建立健全信托公司風(fēng)險內(nèi)控機(jī)制以及信托從業(yè)人員管理辦法。
[Abstract]:Trust, banking, insurance and securities, and known as the four pillars of the modern financial industry. Patent, as an important part of intellectual property rights, is the core element of strategic resources and international competitiveness in the era of knowledge economy. Patent trust, as a new investment and financing tool in the field of patent transformation, conforms to the development of social economy on the one hand, and makes the potential of unlimited value of patent and the leverage advantage of trust strong and strong combination, on the one hand, the patent trust has the unlimited value potential and the leverage advantage of the trust. Fully reflect the full use of things; On the other hand, there are many risks which can not be avoided because of the new nature of patent trust. The possibility of patent trust booming depends to a certain extent on risk control and prevention. It is one of the most effective means to reduce the scope of risk, reduce the loss of risk and prevent the spread of risk through the perfection of the legal system to control and resolve the risk. Based on the introduction of patent trust, patent trust risk and the legal system of patent trust in China, this paper analyzes the internal relationship between patent trust risk and legal control and the significance of legal control of patent trust risk. This paper mainly discusses the main risks of patent trust, including profit risk, credit risk and operation risk. The main reasons of profit risk are the increase of patent infringement litigation and invalidity, the decrease of patent value due to unpredictable technological progress, and the limitation of patent right liquidity. The credit risk of patent trust is increased due to the confusion of environment and supervision in the industry, and the operation risk of patent trust is inevitably caused by the lack of perfect internal control system of trust company and the lack of corresponding human capital of patent trust. But our country already has the basic system and the practice reference of the patent trust legal risk control initially, which means that the discussion of the patent trust risk legal control has the feasibility and the practical significance. Thus it puts forward specific measures to perfect the legal control of patent trust risk. The perfection of the legal measures of risk control in the stage of patent trust establishment mainly includes the establishment of patent value evaluation link, the refinement of patent trust registration publicity system, and the improvement of relevant information disclosure system. The perfection of the legal measures of risk control in the operation stage mainly includes the reform of the government supervision mode, the establishment and perfection of the internal risk control mechanism of the trust company and the management method of the trust personnel.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.282;D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王禮平;世界各發(fā)達(dá)國家信托制度比較研究[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2004年01期

2 王連洲;中國信托制度發(fā)展的困境與出路[J];法學(xué);2005年01期

3 田勝;;專利權(quán)信托若干法律問題研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會發(fā)展;2006年09期

4 徐成文;陳江華;;專利資產(chǎn)證券化研究[J];南陽理工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年01期

5 杜蓓蕾;安中業(yè);;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款難的法律探討[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年09期

6 王紹媛;;日本知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略特點(diǎn)與借鑒[J];現(xiàn)代日本經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年06期

7 王定芳;肖喻昊;;全國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資研討會綜述[J];武漢金融;2006年12期

8 尼克·伯特洛蒂;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的評估方法[J];中國資產(chǎn)評估;1997年01期

9 王清麗;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的評估和變現(xiàn)[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年04期

本文編號：2434830