【摘要】：復(fù)制權(quán)是著作權(quán)人享有的基礎(chǔ)性著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)，也是經(jīng)濟(jì)權(quán)利中最早的權(quán)利。網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展在給我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)帶來(lái)新的增長(zhǎng)契機(jī)的同時(shí)，也給我國(guó)的法律特別是著作權(quán)法帶來(lái)了巨大的沖擊。因?yàn)榫W(wǎng)絡(luò)以其可以提供超常規(guī)模的信息資源，極強(qiáng)滲透能力的信息復(fù)制與傳播設(shè)施，以復(fù)制行為的普遍性、復(fù)制效果的逼真性、傳播的高速性以及成本的低廉性，成為世界上最大的復(fù)制設(shè)備。面對(duì)新技術(shù)給知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度提出的挑戰(zhàn)，如何一方面實(shí)現(xiàn)知識(shí)盡可能造福于社會(huì)公眾的宗旨，另一方面又能最大程度的為創(chuàng)造者提供激勵(lì)，將成為網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界里一個(gè)很大的難題。 本文由有關(guān)臨時(shí)復(fù)制的一個(gè)案例——騰訊訴王友金、淘寶網(wǎng)著作權(quán)糾紛案談起，擬對(duì)臨時(shí)復(fù)制和傳統(tǒng)復(fù)制進(jìn)行客觀比對(duì)，探討臨時(shí)復(fù)制是否應(yīng)歸結(jié)為傳統(tǒng)復(fù)制范圍；其次結(jié)合與臨時(shí)復(fù)制相關(guān)的國(guó)際和地區(qū)立法現(xiàn)狀和背景，從公眾合理使用、著作權(quán)人對(duì)臨時(shí)復(fù)制的控制方式及其有限性等方面進(jìn)行了論述；最后本文對(duì)我國(guó)立法提出相應(yīng)的對(duì)策建議，，認(rèn)為我國(guó)著作權(quán)法應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)臨時(shí)復(fù)制問(wèn)題進(jìn)行明確，以實(shí)現(xiàn)著作權(quán)保護(hù)與信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)流通的平衡。 本文共分三章。第一章概述了臨時(shí)復(fù)制的概念、特征及其與傳統(tǒng)復(fù)制的比較，得出其是否屬于傳統(tǒng)復(fù)制。第二章提出了國(guó)際上關(guān)于臨時(shí)復(fù)制的立法分析，列舉了歐盟、美國(guó)以及加拿大等國(guó)的立法情況及探討立法背后的經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)因。第三章著重分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段有關(guān)臨時(shí)復(fù)制立法的情況并提出了對(duì)臨時(shí)復(fù)制的立法對(duì)策的建議。
[Abstract]:The right of reproduction is the fundamental property right of copyright owner and the earliest right of economic right. The rapid development of network technology not only brings a new opportunity for the growth of our economy, but also brings a huge impact to our country's law, especially the copyright law. Because the network can provide extraordinary scale information resources, highly permeable information replication and dissemination facilities, in order to copy the universality of the behavior, reproduction effect lifelike, high speed of transmission and low cost, To become the world's largest replicator. In the face of the challenges posed by new technologies to the intellectual property legal system, on the one hand, how to achieve the goal of maximizing the benefits of knowledge for the public, on the other hand, to provide the greatest extent of incentives for creators, Will become a very big problem in the network world. In this paper, a case about temporary reproduction-Tencent v. Wang Youjin, Taobao copyright dispute case, to compare the temporary copy with the traditional copy objectively, to explore whether the temporary copy should be reduced to the scope of the traditional copy; Secondly, combining with the current situation and background of international and regional legislation related to temporary reproduction, this paper discusses the reasonable use of the public, the control mode of the copyright owner to the temporary copy and its limitation, and so on. Finally, this paper puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions to the legislation of our country, and holds that China's copyright law should make clear the issue of temporary reproduction in order to achieve the balance between copyright protection and the circulation of information network. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter summarizes the concept of temporary replication, its characteristics and its comparison with traditional replication, and gets whether it belongs to traditional replication. The second chapter puts forward the international legislation analysis about temporary replication, lists the legislation situation of EU, USA and Canada, and probes into the economic motivation behind the legislation. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the current situation of temporary replication legislation in our country and puts forward some suggestions on the legislative countermeasures of temporary replication.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐廣良;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)保護(hù)的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];國(guó)家圖書(shū)館學(xué)刊;2004年04期

2 蔡仁魯;林先海;;關(guān)于我國(guó)“臨時(shí)復(fù)制”行為的法律心理學(xué)思考[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年11期

3 楊異;吳蕾;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下臨時(shí)復(fù)制的法律界定[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年12期

4 朱理;;臨時(shí)復(fù)制是否屬于著作權(quán)法意義上的復(fù)制——以國(guó)際公約為核心的規(guī)范分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年01期

5 易健雄;蒲奕;;版權(quán)的未來(lái)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年01期

6 羅勝華;;侵害知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為的過(guò)濾判定[J];法律適用;2011年11期

7 郭禾;;信息高速公路對(duì)著作權(quán)制度的影響[J];法學(xué)家;1997年02期

8 何煉紅,陽(yáng)東輝;著作人身權(quán)合理使用制度研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年01期

9 王遷;;轉(zhuǎn)讓QQ號(hào)碼在著作權(quán)法中的定性——兼評(píng)“騰訊公司訴王友金、淘寶公司案”[J];法學(xué);2009年10期

10 鄒杰;薛嘉鈺;;如何看待臨時(shí)復(fù)制[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2008年06期

本文編號(hào)：2413282