著作追續(xù)權(quán)制度研究
[Abstract]:With the gradual development of the art trading market in the field of auction, the quantity of the art trade is gradually increasing, and the art market in China has emerged as the pillar of the national cultural industry. However, the uneven distribution of the interests of the creators and art middlemen in the art market is becoming more and more obvious. In order to prevent the phenomenon that artists' early works were monopolized by artists, France first confirmed the right of succession by legislation, and was gradually accepted by other countries in Europe. Up to now, most countries and regions in Europe and America have begun to attach importance to this law of protecting artists, which corrects the imbalance balance. Therefore, this landmark system balances the economic interests between the original artist and the investor, and realizes the fair value of law. The legislation of our country has already begun to discuss the related problems of the right of pursuing continuation, and has written the system of the right of recovery of continuation into the copyright law of our country according to the national conditions of our country through the way of draft. Starting from the content and the value of the system, this paper studies the mature legislative provisions of the system of the right of continuation of works in various countries in the world, so as to combine it with the current situation of China. The author hopes to provide reference for the future implementation of the system of the right to the continuation of works in the draft of our country. It is believed that it will play a guiding role in speeding up the application of copyright related fields and the refinement of existing legislation. First of all, through the debate on the feasibility of implementing the system of the right of follow-up in our country, this paper has a general grasp and understanding of the legal application of the system of the right of follow-up in the following, and from this point of view, It shows that the introduction of the system of the right of follow-up in China is a progress. Secondly, it discusses the definition, institutional basis and value of the right of continuation of works. It shows that the right of continuation of works is the benchmark to realize the just value and fair value of national law, is the necessary condition for the prosperity of a country's art market, and is also the inherent requirement for the protection of the continuity of a country's works of art. Thirdly, the legislative status of the countries that mainly establish and implement the system of the right to the continuation of works is evaluated. At present, the civil law countries and most common law countries have established the system of the right of continuation of works. Because of the difference of the legislative tradition between the two legal systems, there are differences in the specific setting of the system. This part studies the mature legislation of the two legal systems in order to draw lessons from the future implementation of the system of the right of continuation of works in our country. Finally, it is necessary and feasible to construct the system of the right of continuation of works in our country. Combined with the national conditions of our country and absorbing the mature relevant legislative provisions of other countries, through the current civil law system and Anglo-American legal system of the application of the right to continue system of legal analysis of the current situation, Based on the countermeasures taken by these countries and regions in the application of the continuation right system, this paper puts forward some legal suggestions for the reasonable and effective application of the system based on the market situation in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D923.41
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 丁麗瑛,鄒國雄;追續(xù)權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ)和制度構(gòu)建[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期
2 馮曉青;信息產(chǎn)權(quán)理論與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度之正當(dāng)性[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期
3 鄒國雄;丁麗瑛;;追續(xù)權(quán)制度研究[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評論;2004年01期
4 張今;孫伶俐;;追續(xù)權(quán):藝術(shù)家的福利[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年04期
5 王捷;謝明敦;;名人書信被拍賣的權(quán)益沖突及其法律對策[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2013年05期
6 袁杏桃;;論我國追續(xù)權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2013年06期
7 欽國巍;;探究著作追續(xù)權(quán)制度[J];湖州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期
8 劉斌斌;;著作權(quán)法制的特性——信息時代著作權(quán)法制特性的變革[J];科學(xué)·經(jīng)濟(jì)·社會;2006年04期
9 劉斌斌;陳星宇;;著作權(quán)的間接侵權(quán)之比較研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(xué)(漢文版);2013年04期
10 景輝;;追續(xù)權(quán):偽命題——基于市場分析的視角[J];科技與法律;2013年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 劉翔宇;中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù)品交易機(jī)制研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號:2400958
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2400958.html