【摘要】：清潔技術(shù)是應(yīng)對氣候變化問題的關(guān)鍵，盡管《聯(lián)合國氣候變化框架公約》和TRIPS協(xié)議等國際條約均規(guī)定了發(fā)達(dá)國家向發(fā)展中國家轉(zhuǎn)移清潔好技術(shù)的義務(wù)。但是清潔技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的效果并不甚理想。我國是發(fā)展大國，在后《京都議定書》時期，要在《公約》的要求下進(jìn)一步采取應(yīng)對氣候變化的措施，因此完善我國清潔技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的法規(guī)政策也具有重大的現(xiàn)實意義。 第一章先介紹清潔技術(shù)的概念、特點及其轉(zhuǎn)移的模式，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對以專利技術(shù)和非專利技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的影響，以及發(fā)達(dá)國家和發(fā)展中國家有關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的不同觀點，得出知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對清潔技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移是促進(jìn)而不是阻礙作用。 第二章分析有關(guān)清潔技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的主要國際公約，雖然UNFCCC提出資金和技術(shù)機制，也提出了很多美好愿望，，但效果并不明顯。TRIPS協(xié)議沒有充分考發(fā)展中國家的實際情況，有失偏頗。 第三章以風(fēng)電產(chǎn)業(yè)、光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)和核能產(chǎn)業(yè)為例，分析了域外向我國轉(zhuǎn)移清潔技術(shù)的現(xiàn)狀，得出結(jié)果并不令人滿意，進(jìn)一步分析問題所在。 第四章分析了開放創(chuàng)新清潔技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的模式和局限性，提出構(gòu)建我國清潔技術(shù)專利池，并對清潔技術(shù)的強制許可進(jìn)行了深刻的論證。在此基礎(chǔ)上，進(jìn)一步探尋構(gòu)建和完善我國清潔技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的制度和政策。 我們要善于利用現(xiàn)有制度的靈活性規(guī)定，促進(jìn)清潔技術(shù)的轉(zhuǎn)移，積極參與應(yīng)對全球氣候變化的挑戰(zhàn)，人類社會的可持續(xù)發(fā)展做出應(yīng)有的貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Clean technology is the key to deal with the problem of climate change, although international treaties such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change and the TRIPS Agreement stipulate the obligation of developed countries to transfer clean and good technologies to developing countries. But the effect of clean technology transfer is not very good. China is a big developing country. In the post-Kyoto Protocol period, it is necessary to take further measures to deal with climate change under the requirements of the Convention. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to perfect the laws and regulations on the transfer of clean technology in China. The first chapter introduces the concept, characteristics and modes of transfer of clean technologies, the impact of intellectual property protection on the transfer of proprietary and non-patented technologies, and the different views of developed and developing countries on intellectual property rights. It is concluded that intellectual property protection promotes the transfer of clean technology rather than hinders it. The second chapter analyzes the major international conventions on the transfer of clean technology. Although UNFCCC puts forward financial and technical mechanisms, it also puts forward a lot of good wishes, but the effect is not obvious. The TRIPS agreement does not adequately test the actual situation of developing countries, which is biased. In the third chapter, taking wind power industry, photovoltaic industry and nuclear energy industry as examples, the present situation of transferring clean technology from outside to our country is analyzed, and the result is not satisfactory. The fourth chapter analyzes the mode and limitation of open and innovative clean technology transfer, puts forward the construction of patent pool of clean technology in China, and makes a profound demonstration on compulsory licensing of clean technology. On this basis, we further explore the construction and improvement of China's clean technology transfer system and policy. We should make good use of the flexibility of the existing system, promote the transfer of clean technology, actively participate in the challenges of global climate change, and make due contributions to the sustainable development of human society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭晶;余建輝;石德金;戴永務(wù);;綠色技術(shù)的特點及其對投融資的影響[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2007年11期

2 魯燦;詹銳;;從eBay案看美國專利保護(hù)趨勢——兼論我國專利“停止侵權(quán)”責(zé)任方式[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年09期

3 張青;;中日專利“加快審查制度”之比較[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年06期

4 甘華芳;;淺議低碳專利技術(shù)的強制許可制度[J];法制與社會;2011年16期

5 ;《發(fā)明專利申請優(yōu)先審查管理辦法》政策解讀[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2012年09期

6 郭麗峰;高志前;;專利池的形成機理及對我國的啟示[J];中國科技產(chǎn)業(yè);2006年04期

7 郭羽佼;閆文軍;;eBay案與美國專利制度改革[J];科技與法律;2012年02期

8 程曉楓;唐素琴;;發(fā)達(dá)國家綠色技術(shù)專利申請加快審查制度的比較和啟示[J];科技與法律;2012年03期

9 殷硯;廖翠萍;趙黛青;;對中國新型低碳技術(shù)擴散的實證研究與分析[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2010年23期

10 謝明敦;馬捷;孔虹;;專利池優(yōu)勢探析[J];科技管理研究;2012年22期

本文編號：2390292