傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的正當(dāng)性研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-18 07:57
【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)文化是人類基于千年傳承的共同認(rèn)知,其傳承需要法律制度的有力支撐。賦予權(quán)利人合理的專有權(quán)利才能促進(jìn)傳統(tǒng)文化的利用和文化的再更新,而知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的創(chuàng)設(shè)宗旨就是保護(hù)創(chuàng)造者對(duì)其智慧財(cái)產(chǎn)的權(quán)利。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),運(yùn)用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度保護(hù)傳統(tǒng)文化是合理的,更是正當(dāng)?shù)�。首�?傳統(tǒng)文化的基本概念與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度保護(hù)客體具有一定的相似性,傳統(tǒng)文化的財(cái)產(chǎn)性、時(shí)間性、私權(quán)性特征體現(xiàn)了與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)對(duì)象范圍內(nèi)的一定重合度。所以,傳統(tǒng)文化的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展離不開知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的保護(hù)。其次,這種正當(dāng)性得到了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法學(xué)、法理學(xué)及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的理論支撐。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法學(xué)上,正當(dāng)性的認(rèn)定應(yīng)當(dāng)以著作權(quán)法、商標(biāo)法、專利權(quán)法為主,反不正當(dāng)競爭法為補(bǔ)充,四個(gè)制度具有各自的優(yōu)勢,也有局限性。法理學(xué)上,傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)具有特殊的價(jià)值目標(biāo),天賦人權(quán)論和利益平衡論能夠合理解釋傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的正當(dāng)性。國際法學(xué)上,用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度保護(hù)傳統(tǒng)文化有利于維護(hù)生物多樣性和文化多樣性。經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)上,傳統(tǒng)文化和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的本質(zhì)屬性會(huì)受到經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響并隨之變化,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的探礦理論和租金耗散理論可以充分解釋知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度相關(guān)問題,并對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)作出正當(dāng)性的理論說明。進(jìn)而,傳統(tǒng)文化被納入知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)體系的正當(dāng)性之認(rèn)定,在實(shí)踐中存在的突出法律問題主要是如何劃分權(quán)利主體和行使主體,明確客體的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和認(rèn)定方式,以及為規(guī)避知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的不合理壟斷權(quán),對(duì)權(quán)利主體權(quán)利限制等。運(yùn)用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度保護(hù)傳統(tǒng)文化需要遵循一定的原則,保真性原則、靈活和全面保護(hù)原則以及尊重現(xiàn)有規(guī)則原則應(yīng)是主要原則�，F(xiàn)有的傳統(tǒng)文化保護(hù)模式具體包括防御模式和積極模式,兩大保護(hù)模式存在各自的優(yōu)勢和不足,只有在改革現(xiàn)有模式基礎(chǔ)上,設(shè)計(jì)出全新模式,傳統(tǒng)文化才能得到切實(shí)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)�？梢�,傳統(tǒng)文化的存續(xù)和發(fā)展離不開知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度,同時(shí)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度本身也是隨著保護(hù)對(duì)象的變化而不斷完善的。對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化予以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的正當(dāng)性問題的研究,任重而道遠(yuǎn)。
[Abstract]:Traditional culture is the common cognition of human being based on millennial inheritance, and its inheritance needs the strong support of legal system. Only by endowing the right holders with reasonable exclusive rights can they promote the utilization of traditional culture and the renewal of culture. The purpose of the establishment of intellectual property system is to protect the rights of creators to their intellectual property. The study found that the use of intellectual property rights system to protect traditional culture is reasonable and more legitimate. Firstly, the basic concept of traditional culture has certain similarity with the object of intellectual property protection, and the property, time and private rights of traditional culture reflect a certain degree of coincidence with the object of intellectual property. Therefore, the industrial development of traditional culture can not be separated from the protection of intellectual property system. Secondly, this legitimacy is supported by intellectual property law, jurisprudence and economics. In intellectual property law, the legitimacy should be confirmed by copyright law, trademark law, patent law and anti-unfair competition law. The four systems have their own advantages and limitations. In jurisprudence, the protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture has a special value goal. The theory of natural rights and the theory of balance of interests can reasonably explain the legitimacy of the protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture. In international law, the protection of traditional culture by intellectual property system is beneficial to the preservation of biodiversity and cultural diversity. In economics, the essential attribute of traditional culture and intellectual property will be influenced by economic development and will change with it. The prospecting theory and rent dissipation theory in economics can fully explain the problems related to the intellectual property system. And to the traditional culture intellectual property right protection makes the legitimate theory explanation. Furthermore, the recognition of the legitimacy of the traditional culture being brought into the intellectual property system, the outstanding legal problems in practice are mainly how to divide the subject of right and the subject of exercise, and make clear the standard and mode of identification of the object. And in order to avoid the unreasonable monopoly of intellectual property rights, the rights of the main restrictions. The application of intellectual property system to protect traditional culture should follow certain principles, fidelity principle, flexible and comprehensive protection principle and respect for existing rules should be the main principles. The existing traditional cultural protection mode includes the defensive mode and the positive mode. The two protection modes have their own advantages and disadvantages. Only on the basis of reforming the existing model, the new model is designed. Only the traditional culture can get the real intellectual property protection. It can be seen that the existence and development of traditional culture can not be separated from the intellectual property system, and the intellectual property system itself is constantly improved with the change of the object of protection. The research on the legitimacy of intellectual property protection of traditional culture has a long way to go.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4
本文編號(hào)：2385592
[Abstract]:Traditional culture is the common cognition of human being based on millennial inheritance, and its inheritance needs the strong support of legal system. Only by endowing the right holders with reasonable exclusive rights can they promote the utilization of traditional culture and the renewal of culture. The purpose of the establishment of intellectual property system is to protect the rights of creators to their intellectual property. The study found that the use of intellectual property rights system to protect traditional culture is reasonable and more legitimate. Firstly, the basic concept of traditional culture has certain similarity with the object of intellectual property protection, and the property, time and private rights of traditional culture reflect a certain degree of coincidence with the object of intellectual property. Therefore, the industrial development of traditional culture can not be separated from the protection of intellectual property system. Secondly, this legitimacy is supported by intellectual property law, jurisprudence and economics. In intellectual property law, the legitimacy should be confirmed by copyright law, trademark law, patent law and anti-unfair competition law. The four systems have their own advantages and limitations. In jurisprudence, the protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture has a special value goal. The theory of natural rights and the theory of balance of interests can reasonably explain the legitimacy of the protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture. In international law, the protection of traditional culture by intellectual property system is beneficial to the preservation of biodiversity and cultural diversity. In economics, the essential attribute of traditional culture and intellectual property will be influenced by economic development and will change with it. The prospecting theory and rent dissipation theory in economics can fully explain the problems related to the intellectual property system. And to the traditional culture intellectual property right protection makes the legitimate theory explanation. Furthermore, the recognition of the legitimacy of the traditional culture being brought into the intellectual property system, the outstanding legal problems in practice are mainly how to divide the subject of right and the subject of exercise, and make clear the standard and mode of identification of the object. And in order to avoid the unreasonable monopoly of intellectual property rights, the rights of the main restrictions. The application of intellectual property system to protect traditional culture should follow certain principles, fidelity principle, flexible and comprehensive protection principle and respect for existing rules should be the main principles. The existing traditional cultural protection mode includes the defensive mode and the positive mode. The two protection modes have their own advantages and disadvantages. Only on the basis of reforming the existing model, the new model is designed. Only the traditional culture can get the real intellectual property protection. It can be seen that the existence and development of traditional culture can not be separated from the intellectual property system, and the intellectual property system itself is constantly improved with the change of the object of protection. The research on the legitimacy of intellectual property protection of traditional culture has a long way to go.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳鑄武;;論民族民間傳統(tǒng)文化的法律保護(hù)[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2011年18期
2 戴琳;;民族民間傳統(tǒng)文化的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2011年05期
3 包娜;;遺傳資源專利保護(hù)問題研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2011年09期
4 楊新瑩;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度下如何規(guī)制“生物剽竊”行為——以國際法和國內(nèi)法為視角[J];河北法學(xué);2010年11期
5 周安平;龍冠中;;我國非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)傳承人的認(rèn)定探究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年05期
6 田金花;;論遺傳資源的專利保護(hù)[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期
7 馮曉青;;非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年03期
8 周方;;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)法律保護(hù)模式比較研究[J];科技與法律;2009年02期
9 曹新明;;非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)模式研究[J];法商研究;2009年02期
10 黃玉燁;;論非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)的私權(quán)保護(hù)[J];中國法學(xué);2008年05期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 臧小麗;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的法律保護(hù)問題研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李楊;耦合與超越：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度下的傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)保護(hù)路徑探析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年
2 南國杰;論傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[D];山東大學(xué);2007年
，本文編號(hào)：2385592
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2385592.html
最近更新
教材專著
