【摘要】：隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展，技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)專利化已是一種必然趨勢(shì)，不少國(guó)家的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織均制定專門(mén)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策，來(lái)應(yīng)對(duì)這種趨勢(shì)下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)許可，規(guī)制各種專利權(quán)濫用問(wèn)題。相對(duì)而言，我國(guó)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織對(duì)此問(wèn)題的研究起步較晚，缺乏深入研究。因此，開(kāi)展技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的研究對(duì)我國(guó)而言是迫切且具現(xiàn)實(shí)意義的。 本文第一章以闡述標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化制度、技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)內(nèi)涵和專利權(quán)特點(diǎn)三個(gè)概念始，指出伴隨著全球知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的日益強(qiáng)化，無(wú)論是從滿足技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制定、專利權(quán)人的利益需求還是全球自由貿(mào)易環(huán)境下的戰(zhàn)略選擇，，傳統(tǒng)觀念中技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利這兩個(gè)性質(zhì)上看似完全相悖的概念的結(jié)合已是一種無(wú)法避免的趨勢(shì)。在此基礎(chǔ)上，分析了兩者結(jié)合的效果，由此帶出了本文要探討的問(wèn)題：技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中專利權(quán)濫用問(wèn)題。 第二章通過(guò)列舉四個(gè)典型事例：美國(guó)戴爾電腦公司案、思科訴華為案、DVD事件和MPEG-2技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)專利池，詳盡闡述了技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中專利權(quán)濫用行為主要表現(xiàn)為專利權(quán)人一方面通過(guò)各種手段積極推進(jìn)其專利技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化，另一方面又利用自己手中的專利權(quán)操縱標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制定與實(shí)施，在技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制定與實(shí)施階段構(gòu)成專利權(quán)的濫用。 第三章通過(guò)分析國(guó)際性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織、區(qū)域標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織、主要發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織解決技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)專利權(quán)問(wèn)題的主要手段，概括出目前國(guó)外標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中專利權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制主要體現(xiàn)在三大方面：標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定過(guò)程中的必要專利制度、專利信息披露制度和技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中專利權(quán)的“公平、合理、無(wú)歧視”許可。通過(guò)兩典型案例：Rambus公司專利侵權(quán)案和蘋(píng)果告摩托羅拉濫用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利訴訟的分析，對(duì)此三大規(guī)制專利權(quán)濫用的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的利弊進(jìn)行了全面的分析。 第四章以我國(guó)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中涉及專利問(wèn)題的基本考慮入手，建議我國(guó)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織可從自身的利益出發(fā)，通過(guò)加強(qiáng)和細(xì)化標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織的專利政策、完善我國(guó)《專利法》中的相關(guān)制度和完善《標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化法》下的相關(guān)配套規(guī)則等手段，制定一套與本國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律法規(guī)相配套的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)策略，以達(dá)到平衡社會(huì)公眾與專利權(quán)人的利益，進(jìn)一步規(guī)范我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化行為的目的。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, the patenting of technical standards has become an inevitable trend. Many countries' standardization organizations have formulated special intellectual property policies to deal with the licensing of intellectual property under this trend and to regulate the abuse of various patent rights. Comparatively speaking, our country standardization organization to this question research starts relatively late, lacks the thorough research. Therefore, the research in technical standards is urgent and practical significance for our country. The first chapter begins with the three concepts of standardization system, connotation of technical standards and characteristics of patent rights, and points out that with the increasing strengthening of the global knowledge economy, whether from the formulation of meeting the technical standards, The patentee's interest demand is still the strategic choice under the global free trade environment. The combination of the two seemingly contradictory concepts in the traditional concept of technology standard and patent has become an inevitable trend. On this basis, this paper analyzes the effect of the combination of the two, and brings out the problem to be discussed in this paper: the abuse of patent right in the technical standard. The second chapter enumerates four typical examples: the Dell computer Corporation case, Cisco v. Huawei case, DVD case and MPEG-2 Technology Standard Patent Pool, This paper expounds in detail that the abuse of patent rights in technical standards is mainly manifested in the fact that the patentee, on the one hand, actively promotes the standardization of his patent technology through various means, on the other hand, makes use of his own patent right to manipulate the standard to formulate and implement the standard. In the technical standard formulation and implementation stage constitutes the patent right abuse. The third chapter analyzes the main means of solving the problem of patent rights of technical standards by international standardization organization, regional standardization organization and major developed countries' standardization organization. At present, the regulation of patent abuse in technical standards by foreign standardization organizations is mainly embodied in three aspects: the necessary patent system in the process of standard establishment, the patent information disclosure system and the patent right in the technical standard. Permit without discrimination. Through the analysis of two typical cases: patent infringement case of Rambus Company and Apple suing Motorola for abuse of Standard essential Patent Litigation, the advantages and disadvantages of the three intellectual property policies regulating patent abuse are comprehensively analyzed. The fourth chapter starts with the basic considerations of the technical standards involved in patent issues in China's Standardization Organization, and suggests that China's Standardization Organization may proceed from its own interests by strengthening and refining the ISO's patent policy. To perfect the relevant systems in the Patent Law of our country and the relevant supporting rules under the Standardization Law, and to formulate a set of standard intellectual property protection strategies that are compatible with the laws and regulations of our country's intellectual property rights. In order to balance the interests of the public and patentee and further standardize the standardization of intellectual property rights in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 趙啟杉;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織專利政策反壟斷審查要點(diǎn)剖析——IEEE新專利政策及美國(guó)司法部反壟斷審查意見(jiàn)介評(píng)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年10期

2 丁蔚;;Rambus案最新進(jìn)展與政府在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化制度中的作用[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年02期

3 馬海生;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織的FRAND許可政策實(shí)證分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年02期

4 賈曉輝;潘峰;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)組織知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策FRAND許可原則評(píng)析[J];信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2010年Z1期

5 朱翔華;;國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];標(biāo)準(zhǔn)科學(xué);2009年02期

6 安佰生;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化中的專利權(quán)問(wèn)題:進(jìn)展與挑戰(zhàn)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年05期

7 那英;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的必要專利研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年06期

8 汪莉;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化中專利權(quán)濫用行為的法律規(guī)制[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年06期

9 郭凱;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利難題亟待破解 “面向創(chuàng)新的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利政策研討會(huì)”召開(kāi)[J];中國(guó)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2012年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊帆;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的專利問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉曉軒;專利型技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)壁壘問(wèn)題研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

2 滿璐;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)組織知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策中的專利信息披露制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

3 邵萌子;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的專利權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];北京化工大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2379369