【摘要】：運用耗散結(jié)構(gòu)理論分析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理系統(tǒng)耗散結(jié)構(gòu)生成機制。首先,從理論上分析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理系統(tǒng)耗散結(jié)構(gòu)存在的合理性及特征;其次,利用Brusselator模型對其進行管理學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)譯,并選取2014-2015年統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù),對我國內(nèi)地30個地區(qū)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理系統(tǒng)耗散結(jié)構(gòu)生成機制進行實證檢驗。研究結(jié)果顯示:現(xiàn)階段我國大多數(shù)地區(qū)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理系統(tǒng)耗散結(jié)構(gòu)并未形成,形成耗散結(jié)構(gòu)的地區(qū)僅占13%,部分經(jīng)濟發(fā)達地區(qū)并沒有形成耗散結(jié)構(gòu),系統(tǒng)內(nèi)部無序性程度較高,阻礙了這些地區(qū)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理水平的提升。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of dissipative structure, the mechanism of generating dissipative structure of intellectual property management system in China is analyzed. Firstly, the rationality and characteristics of the dissipative structure of intellectual property management system in China are analyzed theoretically. Secondly, we use the Brusselator model to translate it into management, and select the statistical data from 2014-2015 to make an empirical test on the generation mechanism of dissipative structure of intellectual property management system in 30 regions of mainland China. The results show that at present, the dissipative structure of intellectual property management system in most regions of China has not been formed, only 13 areas have formed the dissipative structure, and some economically developed areas have not formed the dissipative structure. The higher degree of disorder in the system hinders the improvement of intellectual property management in these areas.
【作者單位】： 哈爾濱工程大學(xué)經(jīng)濟管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目(14BGL007,16CGL010) 國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局軟科學(xué)研究項目(SS16-C-19)
【分類號】：F204

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陸小成;;政策執(zhí)行系統(tǒng)耗散結(jié)構(gòu)演化的方向判別與機制構(gòu)建研究[J];科技管理研究;2009年05期

2 李崇陽,王龍妹;產(chǎn)業(yè)系統(tǒng)耗散結(jié)構(gòu)的形成與演化初探[J];福建論壇(經(jīng)濟社會版);1995年03期

3 劉鋒;;溫州市知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展指數(shù)研究[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2014年04期

，

本文編號：2371718