論知識產權爭議的可仲裁性
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-08 13:48
【摘要】：知識產權爭議的可仲裁性問題一直是阻礙知識產權爭議通過仲裁解決的巨大障礙。理論界有很多的專家學者認為知識產權是一項公權屬性的私權利，國家存在專門的知識產權確權機構，如果允許知識產權爭議通過仲裁方式解決的話就會對這些國家機構的機能造成損害，同時錯誤的裁決結果也會對社會公共利益造成損害。而筆者經過研究論證后認為，知識產權爭議的仲裁解決非但不會對社會公共利益造成損害，相反還會對知識產權事業(yè)的發(fā)展起到推動作用，有利于保護知識產權權利人的合法權利。本文撰寫共有四章，分別從爭議的可仲裁性、國內外立法體系以及我國制度構建等多個角度對知識產權爭議可仲裁性做出論證和分析。 本文第一章主要內容是對爭議可仲裁性問題概述，，筆者對爭議的可仲裁性進行理論界定，進而提出爭議的可仲裁性可以按照其性質分為主客觀兩方面可仲裁性，接著探討一項爭議要具備可仲裁性所必須的基本要素。最后闡述和列舉世界各國在爭議可仲裁性方面所采取的立法體系。本文第二章主要對世界各國知識產權爭議可仲裁性的立法態(tài)度進行分類，在世界各國中美國、瑞士對知識產權爭議仲裁全面支持；英國、德國、法國等國家采取的是有條件的支持態(tài)度。知識產權爭議可仲裁范圍的不斷擴大已經是全世界所不可逆轉的趨勢。本文第二章還將知識產權爭議的類型劃分為合同型、侵權型和有效性爭議，并依次對上述幾種類型爭議的可仲裁性做出分析。本文第三章將重點介紹知識產權有效性爭議的可仲裁性,許多專家學者認為由于知識產權是一項影響社會公共利益的權利并且存在專門的知識產權確權機構，所以知識產權有效性爭議并不適宜通過仲裁的方式解決。在該章中筆者將會對上述觀點進行分析和批判，從理論和案例兩個角度來論證知識產權有效性爭議的可仲裁性。本文第四章將會結合我國國情對知識產權爭議可仲裁性在我國的發(fā)展提出一些建議，在本章中會對現(xiàn)階段我國有關知識產權爭議可仲裁性的相關法律制度和仲裁規(guī)則進行闡述和分析。筆者認為我國立法應當明確規(guī)定知識產權爭議的可仲裁性范圍,并實現(xiàn)制度和人才培養(yǎng)兩方面的國際接軌。
[Abstract]:The arbitrability of intellectual property disputes has been an obstacle to the settlement of intellectual property disputes. There are many experts and scholars in the theoretical circle who believe that intellectual property is a private right with the attribute of public power, and that there are specialized institutions for confirming the right of intellectual property in the country. Allowing intellectual property disputes to be settled by arbitration would damage the functioning of these national institutions and the public interest would be harmed by erroneous decisions. After studying and demonstrating, the author believes that the arbitration settlement of intellectual property disputes will not harm the public interest, but on the contrary will promote the development of intellectual property rights. It is conducive to the protection of the legal rights of the holders of intellectual property rights. There are four chapters in this paper, which demonstrate and analyze the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes from the perspectives of the arbitrability of disputes, the domestic and foreign legislative system and the construction of our country's system. In the first chapter, the author defines the arbitrability of disputes theoretically, and then points out that the arbitrability of disputes can be divided into two aspects according to its nature. Then it discusses the basic elements necessary for a dispute to have arbitrability. In the end, the legislative system adopted by countries all over the world in dispute arbitrability is expounded and listed. In the second chapter, the author classifies the legislative attitude of the countries in the world on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes. In the world, the United States and Switzerland fully support the arbitration of intellectual property disputes. Britain, Germany, France and other countries have adopted a conditional attitude of support. The expansion of the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes is an irreversible trend all over the world. In the second chapter, the types of intellectual property disputes are divided into contract type, tort type and validity dispute, and the arbitrability of the above types of disputes is analyzed in turn. The third chapter will focus on the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property rights. Many experts and scholars believe that intellectual property rights are a right that affects the public interest of society and that there are specialized institutions for the confirmation of intellectual property rights. Therefore, the validity of intellectual property disputes is not suitable for arbitration. In this chapter, the author will analyze and criticize the above views, and prove the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property from two angles of theory and case. The fourth chapter will put forward some suggestions on the development of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China. In this chapter, the relevant legal system and arbitration rules on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China are expounded and analyzed. The author thinks that the legislation of our country should clearly stipulate the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes and realize the international integration of system and talent training.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4
本文編號：2368466
[Abstract]:The arbitrability of intellectual property disputes has been an obstacle to the settlement of intellectual property disputes. There are many experts and scholars in the theoretical circle who believe that intellectual property is a private right with the attribute of public power, and that there are specialized institutions for confirming the right of intellectual property in the country. Allowing intellectual property disputes to be settled by arbitration would damage the functioning of these national institutions and the public interest would be harmed by erroneous decisions. After studying and demonstrating, the author believes that the arbitration settlement of intellectual property disputes will not harm the public interest, but on the contrary will promote the development of intellectual property rights. It is conducive to the protection of the legal rights of the holders of intellectual property rights. There are four chapters in this paper, which demonstrate and analyze the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes from the perspectives of the arbitrability of disputes, the domestic and foreign legislative system and the construction of our country's system. In the first chapter, the author defines the arbitrability of disputes theoretically, and then points out that the arbitrability of disputes can be divided into two aspects according to its nature. Then it discusses the basic elements necessary for a dispute to have arbitrability. In the end, the legislative system adopted by countries all over the world in dispute arbitrability is expounded and listed. In the second chapter, the author classifies the legislative attitude of the countries in the world on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes. In the world, the United States and Switzerland fully support the arbitration of intellectual property disputes. Britain, Germany, France and other countries have adopted a conditional attitude of support. The expansion of the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes is an irreversible trend all over the world. In the second chapter, the types of intellectual property disputes are divided into contract type, tort type and validity dispute, and the arbitrability of the above types of disputes is analyzed in turn. The third chapter will focus on the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property rights. Many experts and scholars believe that intellectual property rights are a right that affects the public interest of society and that there are specialized institutions for the confirmation of intellectual property rights. Therefore, the validity of intellectual property disputes is not suitable for arbitration. In this chapter, the author will analyze and criticize the above views, and prove the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property from two angles of theory and case. The fourth chapter will put forward some suggestions on the development of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China. In this chapter, the relevant legal system and arbitration rules on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China are expounded and analyzed. The author thinks that the legislation of our country should clearly stipulate the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes and realize the international integration of system and talent training.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李正華;中美知識產權制度比較研究[J];比較法研究;2003年02期
2 羅東川;;國家知識產權戰(zhàn)略背景下的知識產權司法保護[J];法律適用;2006年04期
3 吳友明;論知識產權仲裁[J];法學評論;1999年04期
4 何艷華;;質疑與回應:國際商事仲裁的保密性[J];法治研究;2010年09期
5 鄒林X;;論爭議可仲裁性的概念與性質[J];公民與法(法學版);2011年11期
6 徐琳;;國際商事仲裁裁決承認與執(zhí)行中的公共政策[J];河北法學;2009年07期
7 馬德才;論國際商事仲裁中爭議事項的可仲裁性問題[J];江西財經大學學報;2000年03期
8 倪靜;;論知識產權有效性爭議的可仲裁性——對公共政策理由的反思[J];江西社會科學;2012年02期
9 李曉桃;袁曉東;;知識產權糾紛的可仲裁性研究[J];科技管理研究;2012年16期
10 吳漢東;關于知識產權私權屬性的再認識——兼評“知識產權公權化”理論[J];社會科學;2005年10期
本文編號：2368466
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2368466.html
