發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-27 20:31

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的快速發(fā)展和知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的逐漸興起，與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)的國(guó)際貿(mào)易活動(dòng)越來(lái)越頻繁，逐漸成為當(dāng)前國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)的熱點(diǎn)和主導(dǎo)。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)是法律賦予智力勞動(dòng)創(chuàng)造者的一項(xiàng)財(cái)產(chǎn)專有權(quán)利，對(duì)其智力勞動(dòng)成果進(jìn)行保護(hù)。加強(qiáng)對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)能夠調(diào)動(dòng)智力勞動(dòng)創(chuàng)造者進(jìn)行科技研發(fā)和知識(shí)創(chuàng)新的積極性，提升產(chǎn)品的核心科技含量，使產(chǎn)品在國(guó)際市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中占據(jù)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位，從而促進(jìn)了企業(yè)乃至全社會(huì)的進(jìn)步與發(fā)展。因此，大力鼓勵(lì)科技創(chuàng)新，建立完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度，已在全球范圍內(nèi)達(dá)成了共識(shí)。 中國(guó)是世界上最大的發(fā)展中國(guó)家，美國(guó)是世界上經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力最雄厚，科技最發(fā)達(dá)的發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家，中美之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易，特別是與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的貿(mào)易活動(dòng)在國(guó)際貿(mào)易活動(dòng)中最為突出，占據(jù)了舉足輕重的地位。中國(guó)人力資源豐富，生產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)品勞動(dòng)力等成本比較低，，并且隨著中國(guó)科技力量和經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力的不斷發(fā)展，產(chǎn)品中的核心科技含量也不斷增多，因此，中國(guó)生產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)品在美國(guó)市場(chǎng)相比于美國(guó)本土產(chǎn)品具有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)，占據(jù)了很大的市場(chǎng)份額，中國(guó)對(duì)美國(guó)的貿(mào)易順差也有所擴(kuò)大。美國(guó)認(rèn)為，造成美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易逆差的原因是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沒(méi)有受到應(yīng)有的保護(hù)，因此，美國(guó)著手制定了一系列有關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的法律條款和協(xié)定來(lái)保護(hù)本國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)，并利用“337條款”對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)提起知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟。適當(dāng)而合理的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)有利于科學(xué)技術(shù)的研發(fā)創(chuàng)新和經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，但美國(guó)為了保護(hù)本國(guó)的相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)，維持市場(chǎng)份額，而濫用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度，將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)當(dāng)作一種貿(mào)易壁壘。這限制了中國(guó)產(chǎn)品的出口，阻礙了中國(guó)的出口貿(mào)易，對(duì)中國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展造成了危害。 本篇論文通過(guò)介紹知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的概念特征等基礎(chǔ)理論知識(shí)，加以經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析，同時(shí)介紹了美國(guó)對(duì)華知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易的現(xiàn)狀，結(jié)合以“思科訴華為案”進(jìn)行闡述，綜上得出了我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題的對(duì)策，即我國(guó)應(yīng)鼓勵(lì)科技研發(fā)創(chuàng)新，建立健全知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度，增強(qiáng)企業(yè)的自主創(chuàng)新能力，促進(jìn)企業(yè)的發(fā)展，同時(shí)抵制美國(guó)對(duì)華的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易壁壘，規(guī)范美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)的貿(mào)易活動(dòng)，保障我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易的正常進(jìn)行，使中美貿(mào)易活動(dòng)健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of science and technology and the gradual rise of knowledge economy, the international trade activities related to intellectual property become more and more frequent, and gradually become the hot spot and leading of the current international economic activities. Intellectual property right is a property exclusive right which is endowed by law to intellectual labor creators to protect its intellectual labor achievements. Strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights can mobilize the initiative of intellectual labor creators in scientific and technological research and development and knowledge innovation, enhance the core scientific and technological content of products, and enable products to occupy an advantageous position in international market competition. Thus promoting the progress and development of the enterprise and even the whole society. Therefore, encouraging scientific and technological innovation and establishing and perfecting intellectual property protection system have reached a consensus worldwide. China is the largest developing country in the world. The United States is the most powerful developed country in the world with the most advanced technology. In particular, trade related to intellectual property rights is the most prominent in international trade activities, occupying a pivotal position. China is rich in human resources, the cost of producing products and labor is relatively low, and with the continuous development of China's scientific and technological power and economic strength, the core scientific and technological content of products is also increasing, so, Chinese products have a competitive advantage over domestic products in the United States market, occupying a large market share, and China's trade surplus with the United States has also expanded. The United States believes that the reason for the US trade deficit with China is that intellectual property rights are not properly protected. Therefore, the United States has started to formulate a series of legal provisions and agreements on intellectual property protection to protect its intellectual property industry. And using Section 337 to bring intellectual property litigation against Chinese enterprises. Proper and reasonable protection of intellectual property rights is conducive to scientific and technological research, innovation and economic development. However, in order to protect its related industries and maintain market share, the United States abused the intellectual property protection system. The protection of intellectual property rights as a trade barrier. This restricts the export of Chinese products, hinders China's export trade, and endangers China's economic development. Through introducing the basic theoretical knowledge of intellectual property protection and other basic theoretical knowledge, this paper analyzes the economics, introduces the current situation of American intellectual property trade with China, and expounds the case of Cisco v. Huawei. In summary, the countermeasures to protect intellectual property rights in US trade with China are put forward, that is, China should encourage R & D innovation in science and technology, establish and improve the system of intellectual property protection, enhance the independent innovation ability of enterprises, and promote the development of enterprises. At the same time, we should resist the trade barrier of intellectual property rights between the United States and China, standardize the trade activities between the United States and China, ensure the normal conduct of China's export trade, and make the trade activities between China and the United States develop healthily.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F757.12;F204

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈國(guó)兵;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與中美雙邊貿(mào)易問(wèn)題[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2006年11期

2 李浩;;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2005年11期

3 曲建忠;張紅霞;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的影響及中國(guó)的對(duì)策[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2005年06期

4 劉建明;袁永友;;中美知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)端及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2007年08期

5 張海林;論經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化進(jìn)程中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的新特征[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2001年06期

6 殷劍峰,方衛(wèi)東;關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2000年01期

7 包海波;美國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的特點(diǎn)及發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年06期

8 徐莉;;美國(guó)337調(diào)查簡(jiǎn)析與應(yīng)對(duì)[J];時(shí)代經(jīng)貿(mào);2008年03期

9 戴雨山;論“337條款”對(duì)美國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)及我國(guó)的對(duì)策[J];政治與法律;2004年06期

10 郭民生;郭錚;;“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)優(yōu)勢(shì)”理論探析[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年02期

本文編號(hào)：2361954