【摘要】：正泰訴施耐德專利侵權(quán)案不僅案情重大,而且全面展現(xiàn)了專利侵權(quán)訴訟中的審判程序及法律適用問題,其間涉及的諸多專業(yè)問題和訴訟技巧對國內(nèi)企業(yè)進(jìn)行跨國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟具有重要的參考意義。因此,對本案進(jìn)行整理、思考和研究,在中國將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)作為戰(zhàn)略發(fā)展規(guī)劃的今天,具有重要的理論和實(shí)務(wù)價值。 本文旨在研究該案中反映出的重要法律問題,主要涉及以下幾點(diǎn)：無效宣告導(dǎo)致的訴訟中止問題、專利保護(hù)范圍如何確定的問題、抵觸申請抗辯的問題以及現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯中的技術(shù)比對問題。專利侵權(quán)糾紛中不構(gòu)成侵權(quán)或不承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任的抗辯事由有很多,本文著眼于抵觸申請抗辯這種新型的抗辯方式,從法律依據(jù)和法理依據(jù)兩個層面對其進(jìn)行分析研究。以往的研究者多將抵觸申請抗辯命名為“在先專利抗辯”并歸入現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯中,本文首次將其命名為“抵觸申請抗辯”,并對其進(jìn)行了獨(dú)立研究,因此本部分是本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn),也是本文的研究重點(diǎn)。另外,本文在結(jié)合具體案情、研究相關(guān)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,對我國專利訴訟實(shí)踐中存在的一些法律適用問題進(jìn)行了批判,并有針對性的提出了幾點(diǎn)完善建議。
[Abstract]:The case of Zhengtai v. Schneider for patent infringement is not only of great importance, but also shows the problems of trial procedure and legal application in patent infringement litigation. Many professional issues and litigation skills involved in the process have important reference significance for domestic enterprises in transnational intellectual property litigation. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical value to organize, think and study this case, which regards intellectual property as a strategic development plan in China today. The purpose of this paper is to study the important legal issues reflected in the case, mainly involving the following points: the suspension of proceedings resulting from the declaration of invalidation, the question of how to determine the scope of patent protection, Conflicts with the application of the defense and the existing technical defense of the technical comparison problem. There are many reasons why patent infringement disputes do not constitute infringement or do not bear liability for compensation. This paper focuses on the defense of conflict application, which is a new type of defense, and analyzes and studies it from two aspects: legal basis and legal basis. In the past, most researchers named the defense of conflict application as "prior patent defense" and classified it as the defense of prior technology. This paper first named it "defense of conflict application", and carried out an independent study on it. Therefore, this part is the innovation of this article, but also the focus of this paper. In addition, on the basis of studying the relevant theories, this paper criticizes some legal application problems existing in the practice of patent litigation in our country, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 和育東;;專利侵權(quán)賠償中的技術(shù)分?jǐn)傠y題——從美國廢除專利侵權(quán)“非法獲利”賠償說起[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年03期

2 崔立紅;;我國專利無效宣告之司法審查與程序價值[J];東岳論叢;2012年05期

3 顧韜;;論在先專利抗辯的適用——兼評在先專利與新穎性[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2006年05期

4 范曉宇;;專利侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)囊捌渑e證責(zé)任——以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》為切入點(diǎn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年01期

5 李新芝;譚紅;;專利無效宣告程序中專利文件的修改[J];法律適用;2012年08期

6 左萌;;專利侵權(quán)中的懲罰性賠償[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年10期

7 張玲;紀(jì)璐;;美國專利侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償制度及其啟示[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年02期

8 尹鋒林;曹鵬飛;;美國云計(jì)算專利侵權(quán)規(guī)則及對我國的借鑒意義[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年06期

9 賀寧馨;袁曉東;;我國專利侵權(quán)損害賠償制度有效性的實(shí)證研究[J];科研管理;2012年04期

10 譚筱清;已有公知技術(shù)抗辯原則在專利侵權(quán)訴訟中的運(yùn)用[J];人民司法;2002年08期

，

本文編號：2355440