【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)手工藝作為非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)的重要組成部分，在工業(yè)化的時(shí)代語境中愈發(fā)顯現(xiàn)出矛盾性的生態(tài)尷尬。一方面，，隨著全球化趨勢(shì)的加劇，傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)資源日益消減；同時(shí)，出于對(duì)文化多樣性的價(jià)值認(rèn)同，傳統(tǒng)手工藝又被作為一種遺產(chǎn)資源予以消費(fèi)，在當(dāng)代的社會(huì)生活中扮演著精神與經(jīng)濟(jì)的雙重角色。對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)手工藝知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的話題研究，正是基于這樣的背景之上。 本文以法理為依據(jù)，突出客觀現(xiàn)實(shí)對(duì)立法研究的反證作用，側(cè)重田野調(diào)查和個(gè)案研究，并結(jié)合定性分析、比較分析和圖像分析等方法，試圖將法學(xué)研究與藝術(shù)學(xué)研究相結(jié)合，挖掘和梳理傳統(tǒng)手工藝行業(yè)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立法之間的需求關(guān)系，以圖進(jìn)行具有針對(duì)性的立法基礎(chǔ)研究，進(jìn)而對(duì)我國非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律的路徑選擇和進(jìn)一步完善提供參考。從目前的相關(guān)研究成果來看，由于專業(yè)的隔閡，使得大多數(shù)的法學(xué)工作者無法深入到傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)形態(tài)的內(nèi)部去理解問題，僅是將其作為一個(gè)渾沌的整體去對(duì)待，擇其點(diǎn)斑，置入預(yù)設(shè)的法理框架之內(nèi)予以探討。其結(jié)果是，無法對(duì)研究對(duì)象做出“分型、分類、分層次”的針對(duì)性研究，因此，在立法建設(shè)上也便無法具體化，從而影響到立法建議的可操作性。筆者試圖從傳統(tǒng)手工藝歷史縱向和文化橫向的兩個(gè)維度入手，對(duì)其文化傳播和知識(shí)保障體系進(jìn)行剖析，并結(jié)合國際、區(qū)域及國內(nèi)立法和執(zhí)法的現(xiàn)狀，對(duì)目前所存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題進(jìn)行解析。尤其集中解決在傳統(tǒng)手行業(yè)中所凸顯出來的焦點(diǎn)沖突之上，經(jīng)過對(duì)此類問題的剖析，以求展現(xiàn)傳統(tǒng)手工藝及其相關(guān)行業(yè)在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)上的復(fù)雜現(xiàn)狀。 筆者認(rèn)為，傳統(tǒng)手工藝的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)不僅僅是個(gè)法律問題，更是一個(gè)文化生態(tài)發(fā)展的機(jī)制問題。同時(shí)，立法研究也不僅僅只是針對(duì)法理層面的探討，而應(yīng)是注重將立法與執(zhí)法環(huán)境相結(jié)合，在充分了解保護(hù)對(duì)象的知識(shí)結(jié)構(gòu)和文化特征的基礎(chǔ)上，挖掘知識(shí)資源權(quán)益主體的底層聲音，并與國際立法相結(jié)合，不斷完善具有可操作性制度創(chuàng)新的過程。
[Abstract]:As an important part of intangible cultural heritage, traditional handicraft has become increasingly contradictory ecological embarrassment in the context of industrialization. On the one hand, with the increasing trend of globalization, traditional knowledge resources are diminishing day by day; At the same time, because of the value recognition of cultural diversity, traditional handicraft is consumed as a kind of heritage resource, which plays a dual role of spirit and economy in contemporary social life. The topic of traditional handicraft intellectual property protection is based on this background. On the basis of jurisprudence, this paper emphasizes the negative effect of objective reality on legislative research, focusing on field investigation and case study, and combining qualitative analysis, comparative analysis and image analysis, trying to combine the study of law with the study of art. Excavating and combing the demand relationship between the traditional handicraft industry and intellectual property legislation, in order to carry on the targeted legislative foundation research, Then it provides a reference for the choice and further improvement of intellectual property law of intangible cultural heritage in China. From the current relevant research results, because of the professional barriers, most legal workers can not go deep into the internal knowledge form to understand the problem, is only to treat it as a chaotic whole, choose its spot, Put into the legal framework of the presupposition to explore. The result is that the research object can not be "classified, stratified" targeted research, therefore, in the legislative construction will be unable to materialize, thus affecting the operability of legislative proposals. The author tries to analyze the cultural transmission and knowledge guarantee system of traditional handicraft from the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the history of traditional handicraft, and combine with the current situation of international, regional and domestic legislation and law enforcement. Analysis of the current existing practical problems. In particular, it focuses on solving the focus conflicts highlighted in the traditional hand industry, through the analysis of such problems, in order to show the traditional handicraft and related industries in the complex status of intellectual property protection. The author believes that the intellectual property protection of traditional handicraft is not only a legal issue, but also a mechanism for the development of cultural ecology. At the same time, the research of legislation is not only aimed at the discussion of legal theory, but also should focus on the combination of legislation and law enforcement environment, on the basis of fully understanding the knowledge structure and cultural characteristics of the object of protection. Excavating the bottom voice of the subject of knowledge resource rights and interests, and combining with international legislation, the process of system innovation with maneuverability is constantly improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安美術(shù)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4;K892.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱其;;藝術(shù)資本主義的實(shí)驗(yàn)[J];讀書;2008年02期

2 朱蘭,林公孚;中國古代手工藝與質(zhì)量管理[J];福建質(zhì)量信息;1999年01期

3 吳漢東;關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本體、主體與客體的重新認(rèn)識(shí)——以財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)為比較研究對(duì)象[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年05期

4 李金果;余建波;;非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)的地理標(biāo)志保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年10期

5 曉公;兩部大辭典侵權(quán)受處理[J];辭書研究;1992年04期

6 曹天生;宣紙到底有沒有泄密?[J];檔案;2000年05期

7 潘魯生;;民間手工藝的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與文化傳承[J];傳承;2012年07期

8 路繼業(yè);知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的制度分析[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2004年04期

9 鄭成思;臨摹、獨(dú)創(chuàng)性與版權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年02期

10 譚天,趙書波;延安時(shí)期美術(shù)家權(quán)益狀態(tài)研究[J];美術(shù)觀察;2005年09期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 許知難;侵犯外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)認(rèn)定問題研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2010年

2 楊萍;鳳翔泥塑當(dāng)代變遷研究[D];中國藝術(shù)研究院;2004年

3 龍文;論民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)的權(quán)利歸屬[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2004年

本文編號(hào)：2333403