【摘要】：如今的世界是知識經(jīng)濟時代,新興領域科技發(fā)展對知識產(chǎn)權領域帶來了極大的沖擊,不同的知識產(chǎn)權之間的矛盾越來越突出,尤其是商標權與在先著作權之間的糾紛,嚴重損害了社會利益。本文在深入分析商標權與在先著作權利沖突的基礎上,闡述了商標權與在先著作權權利沖突的基本理論,總結了一些解決權利沖突的原則,并且提出立法以及司法建議,希望給商標權與在先著作權沖突的解決提供一定的參考。 作者首先分析了商標權與在先著作權的理論含義及特點,在此基礎上將商標權與在先著作權權利沖突界定為兩個權利主客體之間出現(xiàn)的矛盾的法律狀態(tài)和主體利益間的抵觸關系。商標權與在先著作權權利沖突類型的種類繁多,按照客體的性質劃分,主要包括了文字商標與文字作品、圖形商標與平面美術和攝影作品、商標與虛擬角色名稱、立體商標與建筑和雕塑作品以及聲音商標與音樂作品等常見類型。產(chǎn)生商標權與在先著作權發(fā)生沖突的原因主要包含了內在原因,制度原因和其他原因三方面的內容。 我國法律在立法方面存在的問題首先是未明確規(guī)定禁止將與他人在先權利沖突的標記作為商標使用或注冊,其次是到目前為止尚未確定在先著作權的范圍,最后是《商標法》中關于申請登記注冊程序的規(guī)定中沒有區(qū)分商標注冊人的善惡意。在司法實踐中存在的問題則是司法機關過于絕對地保護在先著作權,對于在后的商標權人有失公平,而且造成社會資源的浪費；我國采用的是分散型單行立法體例,關于商標的檢索審查機制尚不完備也是有待提高的地方。利用比較分析法對域外有關商標權與在先著作權的相關法律法規(guī)和條約規(guī)定進行了梳理,結果表明域外立法對商標權與在先著作權權利沖突的解決方法主要采用的是禁止使用、不予注冊和予以撤銷三種處理方式,解決途徑又可以分為事前救濟和事后救濟兩方面。 針對上面分析得出的問題,筆者針對我國法律存在的問題提出了若干解決原則并給出了一些立法和司法方面的建議,在立法方面主要是確定在先著作權的權力范圍和在立法層面上區(qū)分商標注冊人的善惡意。而在司法實踐中則需要建立補償制度并且通過行政途徑來加以解決,當然也可以采用諸如利益共同化和加強有關部門的合作等方式來提高沖突的解決能力。
[Abstract]:Today's world is an era of knowledge economy. The development of science and technology in new fields has brought great impact to the field of intellectual property. The contradictions between different intellectual property rights are becoming more and more prominent, especially the disputes between trademark rights and prior copyright. It has seriously damaged the interests of society. On the basis of deeply analyzing the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright interest, this paper expounds the basic theory of the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright right, summarizes some principles to resolve the conflict of rights, and puts forward some legislative and judicial suggestions. The author hopes to provide some reference for the solution of the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright. The author first analyzes the theoretical meaning and characteristics of trademark right and prior copyright. On this basis, the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright right is defined as the conflict between the subject and object of the two rights and the conflict between the interests of the subject and the subject. There are many types of conflicts between trademark rights and prior copyright rights, which are divided according to the nature of the object, including characters and works, graphic marks and graphic art and photographic works, trademarks and fictitious role names. Three-dimensional trademarks and architectural and sculpture works as well as sound trademarks and musical works and other common types. The causes of conflicts between trademark rights and prior copyright mainly include three aspects: internal reasons, institutional reasons and other reasons. The problems in the legislation of our country are, first, the lack of explicit provisions prohibiting the use or registration of marks that conflict with the prior rights of others as trademarks, and secondly, the scope of prior copyright has not been determined so far. Finally, the provisions of Trademark Law on registration procedures do not distinguish between the good and malicious of the trademark registrant. The problem in the judicial practice is that the judicial organ is too absolute to protect the prior copyright, which is unfair to the latter trademark owner, and causes the waste of social resources. In our country, the single-line legislation method is used, and the examination mechanism of trademark retrieval is not perfect and needs to be improved. The comparative analysis method is used to sort out the relevant laws and regulations and treaty provisions about trademark right and prior copyright. The result shows that the main way to solve the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright right is to prohibit the use of the trademark right. The solution can be divided into two aspects: ex ante relief and ex post relief. In view of the problems analyzed above, the author puts forward some principles to solve the problems existing in our country's laws, and gives some suggestions on legislation and judicature. In the aspect of legislation, it is mainly to determine the scope of power of prior copyright and to distinguish the good and malice of trademark registrants. In judicial practice, it is necessary to establish a compensation system and solve it through administrative means. Of course, we can also improve the ability of conflict resolution by such means as co-interest and strengthening the cooperation of relevant departments.
【學位授予單位】：西南交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.43;D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 芮松艷;;商標在先權利效力確定的時間標準[J];中華商標;2009年05期

2 高榮林;;向前看:解決商標權與著作權沖突的另一種思路[J];中華商標;2010年11期

3 屈茂輝;;論民法上的注意義務[J];北方法學;2007年01期

4 馮曉青;;知識產(chǎn)權的權利窮竭問題研究[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2007年03期

5 劉亞軍;曹軍婧;;虛擬角色商品化權法律保護芻議——美國實踐的啟示[J];當代法學;2008年04期

6 郝鐵川;權利沖突:一個不成為問題的問題[J];法學;2004年09期

7 李彥閣;;知識產(chǎn)權權利沖突典型案例與解析[J];法制與社會;2011年16期

8 陳碧賢;;論商標注冊不當?shù)姆韶熑蝃J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2006年01期

9 劉暢;;從一起案件看著作權與商標權之爭[J];中華商標;2013年08期

10 張紅霄;著作權與商標權的重疊和分界——由一則案例引發(fā)的思考[J];法學;1996年12期

，

本文編號：2333384