天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

中印藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的比較研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-03 17:37
【摘要】:在經(jīng)歷了兩次世界大戰(zhàn)之后,中印兩國均在20世紀(jì)中葉取得了各自的獨(dú)立,建國初期,印度政府基本上沿用了英國殖民統(tǒng)治時(shí)期的專利法,中國則完全照搬了前蘇聯(lián)的專利制度。直到20世紀(jì)70年代,兩國才重新根據(jù)本國的國情建立起了符合各自國家發(fā)展利益的專利制度。由于中印兩國同為人口大國,并且兩國當(dāng)時(shí)的公共衛(wèi)生基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施及其薄弱,為滿足公共衛(wèi)生的需要,兩國都在制定專利法的時(shí)候?qū)⑸婕搬t(yī)藥制品排除在了可授予專利保護(hù)的范圍之外,這一點(diǎn)也是符合當(dāng)時(shí)兩國國情的。制藥產(chǎn)業(yè)不僅對經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展和科技的進(jìn)步具有重要的推動(dòng)作用,其對公共健康衛(wèi)生的影響作用是其他產(chǎn)業(yè)所無法企及的。中印兩國的制藥工業(yè)在制造能力上都己進(jìn)入世界大國行列,尤其是大宗抗生素的生產(chǎn),兩國基本能左右國際市場行情。但是與西方發(fā)達(dá)國家先進(jìn)制藥行業(yè)相比較,中印兩國的差異也是極為明顯的,其中一個(gè)最為突出方面就是缺乏充足的擁有完全自主知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的藥品。這無疑使得兩國在應(yīng)對國內(nèi)可能出現(xiàn)嚴(yán)重的公共衛(wèi)生危機(jī)時(shí)捉襟見肘。在進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)之后,特別是兩國先后成為了世界貿(mào)易組織成員國之后,印度在對待本國專利法與國際接軌的問題上,采取的手段明顯要更加靈活一些。這一點(diǎn)從印度在加入世界貿(mào)易組織之后對于本國專利法的修改便可察覺,印度并未一味的強(qiáng)調(diào)高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的專利保護(hù),而是緩慢的對其專利法進(jìn)行不斷的修正,以符合其國內(nèi)社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展需求,正是這種務(wù)實(shí)的態(tài)度,使得印度制藥行業(yè)為代表的國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)充分得到了法律政策層面上的庇護(hù),并且在經(jīng)過了一定時(shí)期的積累后從容的升級,終究在世界經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的今天發(fā)展成為可以與西方同行抗衡的重要力量,為印度在應(yīng)對今后可能出現(xiàn)的公共衛(wèi)生危機(jī)時(shí),提供了一定的產(chǎn)業(yè)支持。本文通過對印度在其專利制度發(fā)展上的策略和手段的研究,試圖對我國今后的藥品專利制度的發(fā)展提供一些借鑒,特別是在當(dāng)下追求將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)提高到西方發(fā)達(dá)國家水平成為主流的時(shí)代,我國如何做到在既不與國際相關(guān)條約和協(xié)議沖突的條件下,又能充分利用專利制度作為調(diào)整國家產(chǎn)業(yè)政策升級的法律工具來進(jìn)行綜合考量。
[Abstract]:After two world wars, both China and India gained their independence in the middle of the 20th century. In the early days of the founding of India, the Indian government basically followed the patent laws of the British colonial rule. China, for its part, copied the patent system of the former Soviet Union. It was not until the 1970s that the two countries re-established the patent system according to their national conditions. Because China and India are both populous countries, and their public health infrastructure was weak at the time, to meet the needs of public health, Both countries are making patent laws to exclude pharmaceutical products from the scope of patent protection, which is also in line with the situation of the two countries at that time. Pharmaceutical industry not only plays an important role in promoting the development of economy and the progress of science and technology, but also affects public health and health. The pharmaceutical industry of both China and India has entered the ranks of the world's largest countries in terms of manufacturing capability, especially in the production of major antibiotics, and both countries can basically control the international market. But compared with the advanced pharmaceutical industry in the western developed countries, the difference between China and India is also very obvious, one of the most prominent aspects is the lack of adequate medicines with full independent intellectual property rights. This undoubtedly puts the two countries in a tight position to cope with a potentially serious public health crisis at home. After entering the 21st century, especially after the two countries have become members of the World Trade Organization, India has to take more flexible measures in dealing with its patent law in line with the international law. This can be seen from India's amendment to its patent law after its accession to the World Trade Organization. Instead of emphasizing high standards of patent protection, India has been slowly revising its patent law. In keeping with its domestic socio-economic development needs, it is this pragmatic attitude that has given the domestic economy, represented by the Indian pharmaceutical industry, full protection at the legal and policy levels, And after a certain period of accumulation, after a relaxed upgrade, after all, in the face of the globalization of the world economy, it has developed into an important force that can compete with its Western counterparts, so that India can cope with a possible public health crisis in the future. Provide certain industry support. This paper attempts to provide some references for the future development of drug patent system in China through the study of India's strategy and means in the development of its patent system. Especially in the current era when the standard of intellectual property protection has become the mainstream of the western developed countries, how to do it without conflict with the relevant international treaties and agreements, It can also make full use of patent system as a legal tool to adjust the upgrading of national industrial policy for comprehensive consideration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張海興;;TRIPs體制下公共健康專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的發(fā)展趨勢[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年12期

2 劉彬;;仿制藥品立法規(guī)制的發(fā)展新態(tài)勢——以TPP醫(yī)藥專利條款為視角[J];荊楚理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

3 楊燕琳;;印度藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的啟示[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

4 俞鋮航;田侃;喻小勇;;印度藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度分析及對中國的啟迪[J];中國新藥雜志;2016年03期

5 郝敏;;藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度在發(fā)展中國家的應(yīng)用——從“抗癌藥代購第一人”陸勇事件談起[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年08期

6 張清奎;李紅團(tuán);;關(guān)于藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的探討和思考[J];藥學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年08期

7 馮潔菡;;專利本地實(shí)施要求的合法性之爭——國際法與國內(nèi)法實(shí)踐評析[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年09期

8 孔祥俊;;積極打造我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)的“升級版”——經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化、新科技革命和創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略下的新思考[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年02期

9 張?zhí)?邵蓉;;公共健康危機(jī)視野下藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的探討[J];上海醫(yī)藥;2012年17期

10 張茅;;深化醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生體制改革 促進(jìn)衛(wèi)生事業(yè)科學(xué)發(fā)展[J];求是;2012年15期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 黃天香 ;任麗梅 ;一軒;;遞交惠民新答卷 造福尋常百姓家[N];中國改革報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張艷梅;藥品專利法律問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 李瑩瑩;環(huán)境技術(shù)專利強(qiáng)制許可制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

2 徐山茶;論我國藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的實(shí)施[D];西南大學(xué);2014年

3 王乃嘉;我國藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑及其完善研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2014年

4 舒佳英;我國藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

5 周玲;中印專利強(qiáng)制許可問題比較研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

6 王金明;全球?qū)@幍狡诔北尘跋碌闹扑幤髽I(yè)投資分析[D];上海交通大學(xué);2013年

7 武振康;中印藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度比較研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年

8 張冬;新專利法下藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

,

本文編號:2308481

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2308481.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶b4342***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com