中印藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的比較研究
[Abstract]:After two world wars, both China and India gained their independence in the middle of the 20th century. In the early days of the founding of India, the Indian government basically followed the patent laws of the British colonial rule. China, for its part, copied the patent system of the former Soviet Union. It was not until the 1970s that the two countries re-established the patent system according to their national conditions. Because China and India are both populous countries, and their public health infrastructure was weak at the time, to meet the needs of public health, Both countries are making patent laws to exclude pharmaceutical products from the scope of patent protection, which is also in line with the situation of the two countries at that time. Pharmaceutical industry not only plays an important role in promoting the development of economy and the progress of science and technology, but also affects public health and health. The pharmaceutical industry of both China and India has entered the ranks of the world's largest countries in terms of manufacturing capability, especially in the production of major antibiotics, and both countries can basically control the international market. But compared with the advanced pharmaceutical industry in the western developed countries, the difference between China and India is also very obvious, one of the most prominent aspects is the lack of adequate medicines with full independent intellectual property rights. This undoubtedly puts the two countries in a tight position to cope with a potentially serious public health crisis at home. After entering the 21st century, especially after the two countries have become members of the World Trade Organization, India has to take more flexible measures in dealing with its patent law in line with the international law. This can be seen from India's amendment to its patent law after its accession to the World Trade Organization. Instead of emphasizing high standards of patent protection, India has been slowly revising its patent law. In keeping with its domestic socio-economic development needs, it is this pragmatic attitude that has given the domestic economy, represented by the Indian pharmaceutical industry, full protection at the legal and policy levels, And after a certain period of accumulation, after a relaxed upgrade, after all, in the face of the globalization of the world economy, it has developed into an important force that can compete with its Western counterparts, so that India can cope with a possible public health crisis in the future. Provide certain industry support. This paper attempts to provide some references for the future development of drug patent system in China through the study of India's strategy and means in the development of its patent system. Especially in the current era when the standard of intellectual property protection has become the mainstream of the western developed countries, how to do it without conflict with the relevant international treaties and agreements, It can also make full use of patent system as a legal tool to adjust the upgrading of national industrial policy for comprehensive consideration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D923.42
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張海興;;TRIPs體制下公共健康專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的發(fā)展趨勢[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年12期
2 劉彬;;仿制藥品立法規(guī)制的發(fā)展新態(tài)勢——以TPP醫(yī)藥專利條款為視角[J];荊楚理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期
3 楊燕琳;;印度藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的啟示[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期
4 俞鋮航;田侃;喻小勇;;印度藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度分析及對中國的啟迪[J];中國新藥雜志;2016年03期
5 郝敏;;藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度在發(fā)展中國家的應(yīng)用——從“抗癌藥代購第一人”陸勇事件談起[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年08期
6 張清奎;李紅團(tuán);;關(guān)于藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的探討和思考[J];藥學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年08期
7 馮潔菡;;專利本地實(shí)施要求的合法性之爭——國際法與國內(nèi)法實(shí)踐評析[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年09期
8 孔祥俊;;積極打造我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)的“升級版”——經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化、新科技革命和創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略下的新思考[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年02期
9 張?zhí)?邵蓉;;公共健康危機(jī)視野下藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的探討[J];上海醫(yī)藥;2012年17期
10 張茅;;深化醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生體制改革 促進(jìn)衛(wèi)生事業(yè)科學(xué)發(fā)展[J];求是;2012年15期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 黃天香 ;任麗梅 ;一軒;;遞交惠民新答卷 造福尋常百姓家[N];中國改革報(bào);2012年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張艷梅;藥品專利法律問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條
1 李瑩瑩;環(huán)境技術(shù)專利強(qiáng)制許可制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年
2 徐山茶;論我國藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的實(shí)施[D];西南大學(xué);2014年
3 王乃嘉;我國藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑及其完善研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2014年
4 舒佳英;我國藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年
5 周玲;中印專利強(qiáng)制許可問題比較研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年
6 王金明;全球?qū)@幍狡诔北尘跋碌闹扑幤髽I(yè)投資分析[D];上海交通大學(xué);2013年
7 武振康;中印藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度比較研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年
8 張冬;新專利法下藥品專利強(qiáng)制許可制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年
,本文編號:2308481
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2308481.html