“微信”商標(biāo)的注冊爭議評析及其解決路徑
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-26 06:53
【摘要】：商標(biāo)評審委員會(huì)(以下簡稱"商評委")對"微信"商標(biāo)不予注冊的裁定以及北京知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法院作出維持商評委裁定的一審判決,在商標(biāo)理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界引起了軒然大波。"微信"商標(biāo)能否注冊,除標(biāo)志本身是否具有顯著性以外,案件的焦點(diǎn)還在于《商標(biāo)法》第10條第1款第(8)項(xiàng)的"不良影響"應(yīng)該如何認(rèn)定和適用。"不良影響"雖然是一種兜底性質(zhì)的條款,但其適用也應(yīng)遵循一定的法律理路,有其特定的界限,標(biāo)志的"不良影響"應(yīng)從其本身或其構(gòu)成要素的"音、形、義"方面加以判斷,不可作任意的擴(kuò)張性解釋。解決這一爭議,需要從延遲公開這一技術(shù)層面進(jìn)行改善以及運(yùn)用商標(biāo)共存理念予以克服。
[Abstract]:The decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (hereinafter referred to as "the Merchants jury") not to register the trademark of WeChat and the decision of the Beijing intellectual property Court to uphold the ruling of the Commercial jury have caused a great uproar in the trademark theoretical and practical circles. " Apart from the significance of the logo itself, the focus of the case is how the "adverse effects" of Article 10 (1) (8) of the Trademark Law should be identified and applied. " Although "adverse influence" is a kind of clause with a bottom character, its application should also follow a certain legal principle and have its specific limits. The "adverse effect" of the mark should be judged from the aspects of "sound, shape and meaning" of its own or its constituent elements. There can be no arbitrary expansionary interpretation. To resolve this dispute, we need to improve the technology of delayed disclosure and use the concept of trademark coexistence to overcome it.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：“‘和諧世界’理念下國際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度重構(gòu)的若干法律問題研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):08BFX083) 教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地基金資助項(xiàng)目“二十一世紀(jì)國際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度發(fā)展中的若干重大法律問題研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):07JJD820163)
【分類號(hào)】：D923.43
本文編號(hào)：2294912
[Abstract]:The decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (hereinafter referred to as "the Merchants jury") not to register the trademark of WeChat and the decision of the Beijing intellectual property Court to uphold the ruling of the Commercial jury have caused a great uproar in the trademark theoretical and practical circles. " Apart from the significance of the logo itself, the focus of the case is how the "adverse effects" of Article 10 (1) (8) of the Trademark Law should be identified and applied. " Although "adverse influence" is a kind of clause with a bottom character, its application should also follow a certain legal principle and have its specific limits. The "adverse effect" of the mark should be judged from the aspects of "sound, shape and meaning" of its own or its constituent elements. There can be no arbitrary expansionary interpretation. To resolve this dispute, we need to improve the technology of delayed disclosure and use the concept of trademark coexistence to overcome it.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：“‘和諧世界’理念下國際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度重構(gòu)的若干法律問題研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):08BFX083) 教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地基金資助項(xiàng)目“二十一世紀(jì)國際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度發(fā)展中的若干重大法律問題研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):07JJD820163)
【分類號(hào)】：D923.43
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 黃武雙;阮開欣;;商標(biāo)申請人與在后使用人利益的沖突與權(quán)衡[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年04期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 黃匯;;商標(biāo)法中的公共利益及其保護(hù)——以“微信”商標(biāo)案為對象的邏輯分析與法理展開[J];法學(xué);2015年10期
2 孔祥俊;;論商標(biāo)法的體系性適用——在《商標(biāo)法》第8條基礎(chǔ)上的展開[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年06期
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 許婕;;試論人大的行政化及其不良影響[J];貴州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年11期
2 王文婷;林少河;詹勇;;低俗網(wǎng)站對當(dāng)代大學(xué)生的影響及對策研究[J];學(xué)理論;2010年08期
3 ;李小璐陷不雅視頻事件,誹謗還是侮辱?[J];法律與生活;2014年11期
4 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張志蓮;網(wǎng)絡(luò)對農(nóng)村初中生的不良影響及對策研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：2294912
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2294912.html
最近更新
教材專著
