【摘要】：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押作為一種新型的融資方式，不僅拓寬了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)化途徑，加快了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)成果的轉(zhuǎn)化，而且其對于推動我國知識經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展至關(guān)重要。2004年以來北京、上海、深圳等知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展水平較好的地區(qū)率先開始了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資試點。試點中，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中的風(fēng)險控制和分散一直是各界研究的核心。目前，各地都采取了各具特色的措施來分散知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中的風(fēng)險，具體有：引入擔(dān)保機制、強化政府財政支持、規(guī)范知識產(chǎn)權(quán)價值評估等。毫無疑問，這些手段對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中的風(fēng)險控制起到了一定的積極的作用，推動了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的發(fā)展。 但是，隨著試點的逐步深入，政府補貼和擔(dān)保機構(gòu)的問題開始逐漸凸顯。于是，以分散風(fēng)險為主要職能的保險開始引起學(xué)者們的關(guān)注，很多學(xué)者都提出了在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中引入保險機制的設(shè)想。他們認為可以在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中引入知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保險和信用保險�？墒菂s鮮少有學(xué)者就知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中保險制度所面臨的各種具體問題展開論述。在政府政策推動下，各地以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保險和企業(yè)貸款保證保險為切入點，對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資試點中保險機制的引入進行了有益的嘗試，并取得了一定的進展。但是，不管是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保險還是貸款保證保險，因其在我國的發(fā)展時間都比較短，相關(guān)研究不足，市場對該兩類險種不太熟悉等諸多原因，目前知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中保險機制引入的試點范圍還比較小，參與的企業(yè)、銀行、保險公司也比較少，相關(guān)保險業(yè)務(wù)推廣還存在一定的問題。 基于目前這種情況，本文擬從論證知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中保險機制引入的必要性和可行性入手，針對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保險和企業(yè)貸款保證保險的基本內(nèi)容，其定義的界定、與一般財產(chǎn)保險的區(qū)別、合同的基本內(nèi)容等進行簡要的概述，并結(jié)合知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中保險制度建立的現(xiàn)狀，，分析在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中構(gòu)建保險機制所面臨的問題。在以上分析的基礎(chǔ)上，對完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中保險制度構(gòu)建的外部環(huán)境和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中保險制度構(gòu)建的具體設(shè)計兩個方面，提出自己的一些具體建議。
[Abstract]:As a new type of financing method, intellectual property pledge not only broadens the way of intellectual property transformation and accelerates the transformation of intellectual property achievements, but also plays an important role in promoting the development of knowledge economy in China. Shenzhen and other areas with a good level of intellectual property rights development took the lead in launching IPR pledge financing pilot projects. In the pilot project, risk control and dispersion in intellectual property pledge financing has been the core of research. At present, various measures have been taken to spread the risks in the financing of intellectual property pledge, such as introducing guarantee mechanism, strengthening government financial support, standardizing the evaluation of intellectual property value, and so on. There is no doubt that these methods play a positive role in the risk control of intellectual property pledge financing, and promote the development of intellectual property mortgage financing. However, with the gradual deepening of the pilot, the issue of government subsidies and guarantee agencies began to gradually highlight. Therefore, the insurance with decentralized risk as its main function has attracted the attention of scholars. Many scholars have put forward the idea of introducing insurance mechanism into intellectual property pledge financing. They believe that intellectual property insurance and credit insurance can be introduced into intellectual property pledge financing. However, few scholars discuss the specific problems faced by the insurance system in intellectual property pledge financing. Under the promotion of government policy, various localities have made a beneficial attempt to introduce the insurance mechanism in the pilot project of intellectual property pledge financing with intellectual property insurance and enterprise loan guarantee insurance as the starting point, and have made some progress. However, whether it is intellectual property insurance or loan guarantee insurance, because of its relatively short development time in our country, the lack of relevant research, the market is not very familiar with the two types of insurance, and so on. At present, the pilot scope of insurance mechanism introduced in intellectual property pledge financing is still relatively small, the participating enterprises, banks and insurance companies are also relatively few, and there are still some problems in the promotion of related insurance business. Based on this situation, this paper intends to demonstrate the necessity and feasibility of introducing the insurance mechanism in intellectual property mortgage financing, and define the definition of the basic content of intellectual property insurance and enterprise loan guarantee insurance. The difference from general property insurance, the basic content of contract and the current situation of the establishment of insurance system in intellectual property pledge financing are briefly summarized, and the problems faced in the construction of insurance mechanism in intellectual property pledge financing are analyzed. On the basis of the above analysis, this paper puts forward some concrete suggestions on improving the external environment of the insurance system construction in intellectual property mortgage financing and the concrete design of the insurance system construction in intellectual property mortgage financing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.2;D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉沛佩;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的法律依據(jù)與制度重構(gòu)[J];重慶社會科學(xué);2010年12期

2 周麗;;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資典型模式之比較分析——基于法律社會學(xué)的分析視野[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年11期

3 賈林青;保證保險合同的法律性質(zhì)之我見[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報);2002年09期

4 上海市高級人民法院課題組;;保險代位求償權(quán)糾紛案件的法律適用問題研究[J];法律適用;2011年05期

5 胡玫;朱雪忠;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟費用保險機制探析[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2007年06期

6 陶麗琴;魏晨雨;李青;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資中政府支持政策的實施和完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年10期

7 彭飛榮;楊夢;王全興;;論我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資保險制度之建構(gòu)——從保險法角度切入[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年06期

8 李亮;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保險制度研究[J];法律適用;2012年12期

9 任自力;;保證保險法律屬性再思考[J];保險研究;2013年07期

10 陳冬梅;發(fā)展貨款信用保險支持民營企業(yè)發(fā)展[J];上海保險;2001年06期

本文編號：2267376