我國外觀設(shè)計專利授權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-12 21:05
【摘要】：人類的文明史就是一部設(shè)計史。在人類自己制造的世界中，無數(shù)的產(chǎn)品和設(shè)計都凝聚著人類的智慧和努力，因此智慧成果應(yīng)該受到法律的保護(hù)。在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)這種特定的權(quán)利上法律的保護(hù)表現(xiàn)為一種壟斷性，一種排他的權(quán)利。但是這種權(quán)利的授予必須要謹(jǐn)慎，因為設(shè)計者的成果也在之前他人的勞動成果或者社會公眾利益上進(jìn)行的創(chuàng)新，所以對他的授權(quán)不能損害他人的合法權(quán)利或社會公眾的利益并在此基礎(chǔ)上達(dá)到一個利益平衡的狀態(tài)。雖然我國對專利進(jìn)行制度性的保護(hù)已有三十余年，外觀設(shè)計的申請量與授權(quán)量均排名世界第一，，但畢竟保護(hù)歷史較短暫，自身經(jīng)驗不夠豐富，更多的是借鑒與移植于別的國家，在實際實施過程中，自身存在不少局限性以及亟待解決的問題。 從對外觀設(shè)計的定義及作用開始，闡明我國外觀設(shè)計立法的保護(hù)客體。通過對我國現(xiàn)行外觀設(shè)計授權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的展開，對我國的外觀設(shè)計授權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)形成一個初步的認(rèn)識，并解釋筆者為何不贊成將“工業(yè)實用性”和“富有美感”納入外觀設(shè)計專利的授權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在對國外的授權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及研究現(xiàn)狀做一些初步的描述的基礎(chǔ)上，分析其新穎性和創(chuàng)造性，借他山之石以攻玉，在這個基礎(chǔ)上以我國外觀設(shè)計專利的一些侵權(quán)與授權(quán)案例進(jìn)行分析，以案說法，在判決中分析何謂外觀設(shè)計專利的新穎性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及創(chuàng)造性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，如新穎性的判斷、創(chuàng)造性中“明顯區(qū)別”的判斷以及對“與他人在申請日以前已經(jīng)取得的合法權(quán)利相沖突”的理解與評判，并對“明顯區(qū)別”提出自己的看法。在最后我們闡述的方面則是我國現(xiàn)行外觀設(shè)計專利的實質(zhì)授權(quán)所面臨的解析及建議。如新穎性的判斷、創(chuàng)造性中“明顯區(qū)別”的判斷以及對“與他人在申請日以前已經(jīng)取得的合法權(quán)利相沖突”的理解與評判。最后則是對我國外觀設(shè)計制度提出了一些建議，包括堅持絕對新穎性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，修改創(chuàng)造性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的判斷主體，以及對工業(yè)產(chǎn)品分類實行實質(zhì)審查制度與非實質(zhì)審查制度。
[Abstract]:The history of human civilization is a history of design. In the world made by human beings, countless products and designs condense the wisdom and effort of human beings, so the fruits of wisdom should be protected by law. The legal protection of intellectual property rights is a monopoly and an exclusive right. But this right must be granted with caution, because the designer's achievements are also innovative in the previous work of others or in the public interest of society. Therefore, his authorization should not impair the legitimate rights of others or the interests of the public and achieve a balance of interests on this basis. Although our country has carried on the institutional protection to the patent for more than 30 years, the number of applications for the design and the amount of authorization are ranked first in the world, but after all, the history of protection is relatively short, the experience is not rich enough, more is to learn from and transplant to other countries. In the actual implementation process, there are many limitations and problems to be solved. Starting with the definition and function of design, this paper expounds the protection object of our country's design legislation. Through the development of the current design authorization standards in China, a preliminary understanding of the design authorization standards in China has been formed. The author also explains why the author does not agree that industrial utility and aesthetic sense should be included in the licensing standards of design patents. On the basis of a preliminary description of the standards of authorization abroad and the present research situation, this paper analyzes its novelty and creativity, and takes advantage of the stone of other mountains to attack the jade. On this basis, some cases of infringement and authorization of design patents in China are analyzed, and in the judgment of cases, the criteria of novelty and creativity of design patents, such as the judgment of novelty, are analyzed. The judgment of "obvious difference" in creativity, the understanding and judgment of "conflict with the legitimate rights obtained by others before the date of application", and the view of "obvious difference" are put forward. In the end, we explain the analysis and suggestion of the actual license of design patent in our country. For example, the judgment of novelty, the judgment of "obvious difference" in creativity, and the understanding and judgment of "conflict with the legitimate rights obtained by others before the date of filing". Finally, some suggestions are put forward to the design system of our country, including adhering to the criterion of absolute novelty, modifying the main body of judgement of creative standard, and carrying out the system of substantive and non-substantial examination on the classification of industrial products.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42
[Abstract]:The history of human civilization is a history of design. In the world made by human beings, countless products and designs condense the wisdom and effort of human beings, so the fruits of wisdom should be protected by law. The legal protection of intellectual property rights is a monopoly and an exclusive right. But this right must be granted with caution, because the designer's achievements are also innovative in the previous work of others or in the public interest of society. Therefore, his authorization should not impair the legitimate rights of others or the interests of the public and achieve a balance of interests on this basis. Although our country has carried on the institutional protection to the patent for more than 30 years, the number of applications for the design and the amount of authorization are ranked first in the world, but after all, the history of protection is relatively short, the experience is not rich enough, more is to learn from and transplant to other countries. In the actual implementation process, there are many limitations and problems to be solved. Starting with the definition and function of design, this paper expounds the protection object of our country's design legislation. Through the development of the current design authorization standards in China, a preliminary understanding of the design authorization standards in China has been formed. The author also explains why the author does not agree that industrial utility and aesthetic sense should be included in the licensing standards of design patents. On the basis of a preliminary description of the standards of authorization abroad and the present research situation, this paper analyzes its novelty and creativity, and takes advantage of the stone of other mountains to attack the jade. On this basis, some cases of infringement and authorization of design patents in China are analyzed, and in the judgment of cases, the criteria of novelty and creativity of design patents, such as the judgment of novelty, are analyzed. The judgment of "obvious difference" in creativity, the understanding and judgment of "conflict with the legitimate rights obtained by others before the date of application", and the view of "obvious difference" are put forward. In the end, we explain the analysis and suggestion of the actual license of design patent in our country. For example, the judgment of novelty, the judgment of "obvious difference" in creativity, and the understanding and judgment of "conflict with the legitimate rights obtained by others before the date of filing". Finally, some suggestions are put forward to the design system of our country, including adhering to the criterion of absolute novelty, modifying the main body of judgement of creative standard, and carrying out the system of substantive and non-substantial examination on the classification of industrial products.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 胡佐超;李靜;張雪莉;于平;周家[
本文編號：2267593
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2267593.html
最近更新
教材專著
