【摘要】：商標權(quán)是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的重要組成部分,在企業(yè)的財產(chǎn)中具有十分重要的價值,是企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟關(guān)注焦點。對商標權(quán)的保護雖有法律的明確規(guī)定,但是現(xiàn)有的規(guī)定不足以調(diào)整社會經(jīng)濟生活中的現(xiàn)實侵權(quán)問題。無論是立法的規(guī)定還是司法的判定,保護商標權(quán),預(yù)防和打擊商標侵權(quán)都必須以商標權(quán)的存在和確定為前提,無商標權(quán)即無商標侵權(quán)。應(yīng)在商標權(quán)確定的前提下確認商標侵權(quán)行為,并通過合法途徑和方法進行救濟。損害賠償是財產(chǎn)性侵權(quán)救濟的方式之一,商標侵權(quán)適用損害賠償救濟。全文共分五個部分,除結(jié)語之外,四個部分主要如下:第一部分,簡要介紹混淆型商標侵權(quán)問題研究的意義及背景,研究的文獻基礎(chǔ),研究的內(nèi)容與思路以及研究創(chuàng)新,為混淆型商標侵權(quán)問題研究的展開作準備。第二部分,討論商標權(quán)界定中的問題。商標權(quán)理論在商標理論中居于核心地位,解決商標侵權(quán)法律問題首要解決商標權(quán)的界定問題。界定商標權(quán)主要涉及在商標權(quán)的內(nèi)容、主體和客體等三個方面存在的問題。商標權(quán)的內(nèi)容在不同的學(xué)說觀點之下有分歧,應(yīng)包括支配權(quán)與禁止權(quán);商標權(quán)主體稱謂混亂,適用范圍狹窄,應(yīng)指所有的商標權(quán)利人;商標權(quán)的客體在主流觀點與抽象概括權(quán)利觀下有差異,一般指注冊商標和未注冊馳名商標。第三部分,討論混淆型商標侵權(quán)行為認定中的法律問題。首先討論混淆型侵權(quán)行為中“商標使用”認定中的問題;其次討論混淆型侵權(quán)行為中“商品、服務(wù)相同或類似”認定中的問題;最后討論“反向混淆侵權(quán)行為”認定中的問題。侵權(quán)行為認定問題的探討為混淆型商標侵權(quán)確認提供理論支撐。第四部分,討論混淆型商標侵權(quán)損害賠償額確定問題。分為兩個部分,一是分析混淆型商標侵權(quán)損害賠償額確定中存在的問題,二是針對前述問題予以應(yīng)對,從而完善商標侵權(quán)損害賠償額的確定。
[Abstract]:Trademark right is an important part of intellectual property, which has very important value in enterprise property and is the focus of economic concern. Although the protection of trademark rights is clearly stipulated by law, the existing regulations are not enough to adjust the real tort in social and economic life. Whether legislative provisions or judicial judgment, the protection of trademark rights, the prevention and combating of trademark infringement must be based on the existence and determination of trademark rights, no trademark infringement. Trademark infringement should be confirmed under the premise of trademark right determination, and remedies should be obtained through legal ways and means. Compensation for damages is one of the remedies for property infringement. The paper is divided into five parts, except the conclusion, four parts are as follows: the first part briefly introduces the significance and background of the research on the confusion trademark infringement, the literature basis of the study, the contents and ideas of the research, and the research innovation. To make preparations for the development of the research on the problem of confusion trademark infringement. The second part discusses the problems in the definition of trademark rights. The theory of trademark right occupies the core position in trademark theory, solving the legal problem of trademark infringement is the most important solution to the problem of the definition of trademark right. The definition of trademark right mainly involves three problems in the content, subject and object of trademark right. The content of trademark right is different from different theories, it should include the right of control and the right of prohibition, the title of the subject of trademark right is confused, the scope of application is narrow, and the content of trademark right should refer to all the owners of trademark right. The object of trademark right is different from that of abstract summarization of rights, generally referring to registered trademark and unregistered well-known trademark. The third part discusses the legal problems in the identification of confused trademark infringement. This paper first discusses the problems in the identification of "trademark use" in the confusion tort; secondly, discusses the problems in the identification of "goods, services or similar" in the confusion tort; finally, discusses the problems in the identification of "reverse confusion tort". The discussion on the identification of tort provides theoretical support for the confirmation of confused trademark infringement. The fourth part, discusses the confusion trademark infringement compensation determination problem. It is divided into two parts: one is to analyze the problems existing in the determination of the compensation for the confusion trademark infringement damages, the other is to deal with the above problems, so as to perfect the determination of the compensation for trademark infringement damages.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李軍;;商標侵權(quán)不停止侵害研究——兼評“非誠勿擾”商標侵權(quán)案[J];河北法學(xué);2016年10期

2 李士林;;商標使用:商標侵權(quán)先決條件的檢視與設(shè)定[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2016年05期

3 曹佳音;;支配權(quán)視角下的商標侵權(quán)混淆可能性研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年04期

4 黃武雙;;反向混淆理論與規(guī)則視角下的“非誠勿擾”案[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年01期

5 姚鶴徽;;論商標侵權(quán)判定的混淆標準——對我國《商標法》第57條第2項的解釋[J];法學(xué)家;2015年06期

6 吳讓軍;;商標反向混淆侵權(quán)問題實證研究[J];中華商標;2015年11期

7 劉小鵬;;從新百倫案看我國商標侵權(quán)賠償原則的司法適用[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年10期

8 韓續(xù)峰;;商標侵權(quán)之混淆理論再思考[J];長安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2015年03期

9 俞風(fēng)雷;;論新商標法中的商標使用問題[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2015年03期

10 王太平;;商標侵權(quán)的判斷標準:相似性與混淆可能性之關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)研究;2014年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 趙嵐;論商標侵權(quán)損害賠償額的確定[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

2 毛思婧;論商標法意義上的使用認定[D];上海大學(xué);2015年

3 吳雪巖;試論商標權(quán)沖突的裁量[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2260007