【摘要】：國(guó)際環(huán)境的復(fù)雜多變、信息技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展、國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)制度的深度變革使得我國(guó)處于產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈低端，以資源消耗來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)增長(zhǎng)的粗放型發(fā)展模式的企業(yè)步履維艱，企業(yè)必須轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式，必須轉(zhuǎn)型。而在轉(zhuǎn)型的過(guò)程中，為了降低構(gòu)筑核心能力的成本和轉(zhuǎn)型的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，企業(yè)不僅有轉(zhuǎn)移原有知識(shí)的需求，也有從外部獲取知識(shí)的需求。這些新舊知識(shí)能否順利為企業(yè)所獲取，直接決定著企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型的成效。 本文的研究由國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型過(guò)程中的知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移模型及其應(yīng)用研究”（11BTQ027）資助。以轉(zhuǎn)型企業(yè)為研究對(duì)象，對(duì)企業(yè)在轉(zhuǎn)型過(guò)程中知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行了多層次和系統(tǒng)性研究。主要研究?jī)?nèi)容有： 1）在文獻(xiàn)研究的基礎(chǔ)上界定企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型、知識(shí)、知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的定義，對(duì)已有研究成果進(jìn)行總結(jié)。以企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型為背景，對(duì)企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型過(guò)程中的知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的特性和形成機(jī)理進(jìn)行分析，篩選出知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素。 2）根據(jù)已提取風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素，運(yùn)用專家問(wèn)卷法、統(tǒng)計(jì)分析法構(gòu)建出最終的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)誘因指標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)體系（包括知識(shí)破損風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、知識(shí)流失風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移時(shí)滯風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、知識(shí)泄漏風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)以及人才流失風(fēng)險(xiǎn)6大類22小類指標(biāo)）。在此基礎(chǔ)上，運(yùn)用專家打分法、模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法對(duì)實(shí)例公司的知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行評(píng)估，，并得出有效結(jié)論。 3）根據(jù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估結(jié)果提出以實(shí)例公司為代表的轉(zhuǎn)型企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的防控策略，以期為進(jìn)行知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移的轉(zhuǎn)型企業(yè)提供參考。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處就在于將企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型與知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移相結(jié)合，對(duì)企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型過(guò)程中的知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行了研究。然而鑒于本人水平有限，此研究尚有諸多可完善之處，但仍能為后續(xù)研究者提供參考。
[Abstract]:With the complex and changeable international environment, the rapid development of information technology and the deep reform of the domestic market economy system, the enterprises in our country are in the low end of the industrial chain, and the extensive development model of resource consumption to achieve growth is difficult for the enterprises. Enterprises must change the mode of economic growth, must transform. In the process of transformation, in order to reduce the cost of building core competence and the risk of transformation, enterprises have not only the need to transfer the original knowledge, but also the need to obtain knowledge from the outside. Whether these old and new knowledge can be acquired by enterprises directly determines the effect of enterprise transformation. This paper is supported by the National Social Science Foundation project, knowledge transfer Model and its Application in the process of Enterprise Transformation (11BTQ027). Taking the transition enterprise as the research object, this paper studies the risk of knowledge transfer in the process of transition. The main research contents are as follows: 1) on the basis of literature research, define the definition of enterprise transformation, knowledge transfer risk, and summarize the existing research results. Based on the background of enterprise transformation, the characteristics and formation mechanism of knowledge transfer risk in the process of enterprise transformation are analyzed, and the factors of knowledge transfer risk are screened out. 2) according to the extracted risk factors, the final risk incentive index evaluation system (including the risk of knowledge breakage, the risk of knowledge loss, the risk of knowledge transfer delay, the risk of knowledge leakage, the risk of knowledge transfer and the risk of knowledge leakage) is constructed by using the method of expert questionnaire and statistical analysis. Intellectual property risk and brain drain risk 6 categories 22 sub-indicators). On this basis, the expert scoring method and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method are used to evaluate the risk of knowledge transfer of an example company, and an effective conclusion is drawn. 3) according to the result of risk assessment, the paper puts forward the prevention and control strategy of the transition enterprises to deal with the risk of knowledge transfer, which is represented by the example company, in order to provide reference for the transition enterprises carrying on the knowledge transfer. The innovation of this paper is to study the risk of knowledge transfer in the process of enterprise transformation by combining enterprise transformation with knowledge transfer. However, in view of my limited level, there are still many aspects to be perfected in this study, but it can still be used as a reference for future researchers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F272

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周仕平;郭東強(qiáng);;民營(yíng)企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型內(nèi)部變量對(duì)知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移影響及其對(duì)策[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

2 王毅達(dá);汪承亮;;知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移的認(rèn)知模型及其在企業(yè)管理中的應(yīng)用[J];商業(yè)研究;2007年05期

3 李炳秀;李明生;;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移之風(fēng)險(xiǎn)作用路徑實(shí)證研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2011年09期

4 李廉水,吳利華,徐彥武,郁明華;公司跨行業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型:特征分析與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制——以中國(guó)上市公司跨行業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型成功與失敗的典型個(gè)案為例[J];管理世界;2004年01期

5 楊桂菊;;代工企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí):演進(jìn)路徑的理論模型——基于3家本土企業(yè)的案例研究[J];管理世界;2010年06期

6 李燁,李傳昭;透析西方企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型模式的變遷及其啟示[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2004年03期

7 王德魯;張米爾;周敏;;產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型中轉(zhuǎn)型企業(yè)技術(shù)能力研究評(píng)述——兼論轉(zhuǎn)型企業(yè)技術(shù)能力再造途徑[J];管理科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

8 李燁;李傳昭;;企業(yè)實(shí)施戰(zhàn)略性業(yè)務(wù)轉(zhuǎn)型的途徑及影響因素[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2004年08期

9 張旭梅;劉春燕;;企業(yè)IT外包中知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與防范對(duì)策研究[J];科技管理研究;2009年06期

10 李坤;;業(yè)務(wù)轉(zhuǎn)型企業(yè)內(nèi)部隱性知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移過(guò)程及特征[J];科技管理研究;2009年09期

本文編號(hào)：2260118