【摘要】：商標權(quán)質(zhì)押是指商標權(quán)人以商標權(quán)為出質(zhì)標的將該商標權(quán)質(zhì)押,當(dāng)商標權(quán)出質(zhì)人到期無法履行債務(wù)時,商標權(quán)質(zhì)權(quán)人可以以出質(zhì)商標的價值優(yōu)先受償。商標權(quán)質(zhì)押具有不移轉(zhuǎn)標的物、出質(zhì)標的價值較大、出質(zhì)資源豐富等優(yōu)點,對中小企業(yè)的融資,高新企業(yè)的融資有著巨大的幫助。商標權(quán)質(zhì)押擔(dān)保已成為許多國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔(dān)保的重要方式之一。我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保體系發(fā)展起步較晚,雖然在《物權(quán)法》、《擔(dān)保法》等相關(guān)法律法規(guī)中明確規(guī)定了商標權(quán)質(zhì)押的基本原則和相關(guān)的法律制度,但法律規(guī)定不具體過于空泛,在實踐中難以具體操作。我國的商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度尚處于起步階段,在商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的立法、質(zhì)押當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利義務(wù)劃分、商標權(quán)的價值評估方法、風(fēng)險防范以及價值變現(xiàn)方式等方面還存在許多問題和缺陷,因此,對其進行研究具有重大的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。本文在分析我國商標權(quán)質(zhì)押的現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題的基礎(chǔ)上,運用比較法、舉例法,將發(fā)達國家和我國的商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度進行對比分析,指出我國當(dāng)前商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的缺陷,從而提出完善我國商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的若干具體對策和立法建議。文章共分四個章節(jié)：第一章從權(quán)利質(zhì)押的概念和特點分析出商標權(quán)質(zhì)押的概念和特點,認為商標權(quán)質(zhì)押是權(quán)利質(zhì)押的一種,商標權(quán)質(zhì)押較之其他類型的質(zhì)押有自己的特征。闡述商標權(quán)質(zhì)押在設(shè)立時無需占有和轉(zhuǎn)移無形財產(chǎn),商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度具有較高的風(fēng)險性。第二章從我國商標權(quán)質(zhì)押立法的背景展開闡述,我國現(xiàn)在商標權(quán)質(zhì)押擔(dān)保的立法現(xiàn)狀,分析得出我國商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度本身存在的缺陷與商標權(quán)質(zhì)押配套制度的不健全等問題是阻礙我國商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度發(fā)展的主要原因。第三章論述了大陸法系國家和英美法系國家商標權(quán)質(zhì)押的法律規(guī)定及其借鑒。該部分從比較法的角度切入,對大陸法系代表國家和地區(qū)法國、德國、日本、我國臺灣地區(qū),英美法系代表國家美國、英國的商標權(quán)質(zhì)押立法規(guī)定進行了考察和評價,通過比較分析,提出國外商標權(quán)質(zhì)押立法對我國的啟示。第四章提出完善我國商標權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的建議。這是本文的核心章節(jié)。首先從立法的角度,明確商標權(quán)質(zhì)押公示制度中登記生效主義應(yīng)改為登記產(chǎn)生主義；明確不同的商標類型能否作為商標權(quán)質(zhì)押擔(dān)保的對象；其次明確商標權(quán)質(zhì)押法律關(guān)系中各主體的權(quán)利義務(wù)；再次明確商標權(quán)的最高額質(zhì)押和轉(zhuǎn)質(zhì)制度的變化和規(guī)定；最后完善商標權(quán)質(zhì)押期對商標的有效監(jiān)管,以及如何完善商標權(quán)質(zhì)押配套制度進行具體論述。
[Abstract]:The pledge of trademark right means that the trademark owner pledge the trademark right with the trademark right as the pledge object. When the mortgagor of the trademark right is unable to perform the debt at maturity, the mortgagor of the trademark right can give priority to the repayment with the value of the pledged trademark. The pledge of trademark rights has the advantages of not transferring the subject matter, the value of the pledge is larger, and the pledge resources are abundant, which is of great help to the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises and the financing of high-tech enterprises. The pledge of trademark rights has become one of the important ways of intellectual property financing guarantee in many countries. The development of intellectual property guarantee system in China is relatively late. Although the basic principles and relevant legal systems of pledge of trademark rights are clearly stipulated in the relevant laws and regulations, such as the property Law and the guarantee Law, the legal provisions are not too general. It is difficult to operate in practice. The pledge system of trademark right in our country is still in its infancy. In the legislation of pledge system of trademark right, the division of rights and obligations of the pledge party, the evaluation method of trademark right value, There are still many problems and defects in risk prevention and value realization, so it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study it. On the basis of analyzing the present situation and existing problems of the pledge of trademark rights in our country, this paper applies the method of comparison and examples, compares the pledge system of trademark rights between developed countries and our country, and points out the defects of the current system of pledge of trademark rights in our country. Some concrete countermeasures and legislative suggestions are put forward to perfect the pledge system of trademark rights in China. The article is divided into four chapters: the first chapter analyzes the concept and characteristics of the pledge of trademark rights from the concept and characteristics of pledge of rights, and holds that the pledge of trademark rights is a kind of pledge of rights, and the pledge of trademark rights has its own characteristics compared with other types of pledge. This paper expounds that the pledge of trademark right does not need to possess and transfer intangible property when it is set up, and the pledge system of trademark right has a high risk. The second chapter from our country trademark right pledge legislation background, our country now trademark right pledge guarantee legislation present situation, It is concluded that the defects of the pledge system of trademark rights and the imperfection of the matching system of the pledge of trademark rights are the main reasons that hinder the development of the pledge system of trademark rights in China. The third chapter discusses the legal provisions and reference of trademark pledge in civil law countries and common law countries. From the perspective of comparative law, this part makes an investigation and evaluation of the legal provisions of the civil law system representing the countries and regions of France, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, the United States and the United Kingdom. Through comparative analysis, this paper puts forward the enlightenment of foreign trademark pledge legislation to our country. The fourth chapter puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the pledge system of trademark right in our country. This is the core chapter of this paper. First of all, from the legislative point of view, it is clear that the registration effectivism should be changed into the register producing doctrine in the trademark right pledge publicity system, and whether different trademark types can be used as the object of the trademark right pledge guarantee; Secondly, it clarifies the rights and obligations of each subject in the legal relationship of trademark right pledge; clarifies once again the changes and regulations of the maximum amount of trademark pledge and the system of transfer pledge; finally, consummates the effective supervision of trademark during the pledge period of trademark right. And how to perfect the supporting system of trademark right pledge is discussed in detail.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.43

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊珊;;一般債權(quán)質(zhì)押制度研究[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版);2006年05期

2 侯太利;;出口退稅賬戶是否具有質(zhì)押權(quán)[J];西部論叢;2007年08期

3 羅小紅;;賬戶質(zhì)押法律問題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年04期

4 張偉;;理財產(chǎn)品質(zhì)押業(yè)務(wù)及法律風(fēng)險防范[J];金融電子化;2009年12期

5 趙魁;;關(guān)于商業(yè)銀行賬戶質(zhì)押業(yè)務(wù)中的法律分析與建議[J];經(jīng)濟研究導(dǎo)刊;2012年27期

6 趙悅林;;林權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款的制度缺失與對策分析[J];法制與社會;2013年07期

7 錢修;;抵押與質(zhì)押[J];金融與市場;1996年11期

8 ;如何辦理股份、股票質(zhì)押?[J];農(nóng)村金融與市場經(jīng)濟;1997年02期

9 舒華;試論我國質(zhì)押制度[J];江漢大學(xué)學(xué)報;1998年02期

10 林莉;某科技信用社是否享有質(zhì)押權(quán)?[J];人民司法;1999年10期

相關(guān)會議論文 前6條

1 吳青;李小平;;個人股票質(zhì)押應(yīng)注意的幾個法律問題[A];中國民商法實務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2001年

2 吳青;李小平;;論債權(quán)質(zhì)押[A];中國民商法實務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2001年

3 謝山;張超;;股份有限公司股票質(zhì)押的若干法律問題[A];中國民商法實務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2002年

4 肖希;沈文文;;保單質(zhì)押貸款法律探析[A];浙江省2010年保險法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2010年

5 徐穎;;銀行保單質(zhì)押融資法律問題分析[A];金融法學(xué)家（第三輯）[C];2011年

6 常中彥;;提單質(zhì)押及其權(quán)利的實現(xiàn)[A];中國律師2001海商研討會論文集[C];2001年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 彭松 聞濤;各方看好券商股票質(zhì)押貸款前景[N];證券時報;2004年

2 北京中倫金通律師事務(wù)所律師 戈宇;上市公司股份質(zhì)押的風(fēng)險[N];中國城鄉(xiāng)金融報;2002年

3 林引福;公司股份質(zhì)押應(yīng)采取工商登記形式[N];中國企業(yè)報;2006年

4 記者 藍彬珍邋見習(xí)記者 武思;無形資產(chǎn)質(zhì)押 中小企業(yè)融資新途徑[N];福建工商時報;2008年

5 王平　柯荊民;證券所有權(quán)及轉(zhuǎn)讓和質(zhì)押[N];金融時報;2003年

6 譚桂紅;股票質(zhì)押糾紛[N];中國機電日報;2000年

7 劉亞力;版權(quán)質(zhì)押實際是品牌質(zhì)押![N];北京商報;2009年

8 本報記者 常河山;河北省年內(nèi)專利權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款將突破2億元[N];現(xiàn)代物流報;2012年

9 本報記者 崔帆;打新股概念遇冷 銀行力推質(zhì)押貸款產(chǎn)品[N];財經(jīng)時報;2008年

10 侯太領(lǐng);誰動了銀行的奶酪？[N];國際商報;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 諶天;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資法律問題研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2015年

2 韓莉娜;銀行理財產(chǎn)品質(zhì)押制度研究[D];南京大學(xué);2013年

3 李鈺;淺談租車詐騙中若干法律適用問題[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

4 王新江;理財產(chǎn)品質(zhì)押的法律分析[D];寧波大學(xué);2014年

5 裴小青;基于威布爾分布的農(nóng)產(chǎn)品改良品最優(yōu)質(zhì)押率決策模型研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2015年

6 陳茜;賬戶質(zhì)押法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

7 宋雨農(nóng);論我國商標權(quán)質(zhì)押法律制度的完善[D];福州大學(xué);2014年

8 夏志華;著作權(quán)質(zhì)押問題探析[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

9 翁兩民;銀行賬戶質(zhì)押研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

10 夏s，

本文編號：2183465