信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)視野中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者間接侵權(quán)問題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-04 17:36
【摘要】：隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息傳播的快速發(fā)展，互聯(lián)網(wǎng)傳輸作為一種全新的作品（信息）傳播方式，給社會公眾帶來前所未有的便利。但是相對的，電子化的作品（信息）與國際互聯(lián)網(wǎng)給權(quán)利人帶來的卻是種種憂慮。在如今的作品（信息）傳播渠道上，互聯(lián)網(wǎng)已成為當(dāng)之無愧的主力軍，互聯(lián)網(wǎng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)事件頻繁發(fā)生。世界范圍上看，網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題已成為網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律發(fā)展進(jìn)程中的目標(biāo)性難題，而網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者（Internet Service provider，以下簡稱“ISP”）間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度的建立和完善則是互聯(lián)網(wǎng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的關(guān)鍵性問題。因此，適時(shí)適當(dāng)加強(qiáng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和數(shù)字環(huán)境下ISP、著作權(quán)人和社會公眾利益的平衡，規(guī)范作品等在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上的傳播行為的任務(wù)顯得十分突出。 有關(guān)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)的課題近年來一直是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)者研究的熱點(diǎn)，這一方面源于司法實(shí)踐的迫切需要，另一方面則在于我國此方面立法幾乎處于空白狀態(tài)，盡管2012年底公布的《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理侵害信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)民事糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》（以下簡稱“2012年《司法解釋》”）很大程度上促進(jìn)了妨害該專有權(quán)利責(zé)任追究立法上的完善。但本質(zhì)而言，，我國對信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)的理論研究仍然相對落后，法律適用也不夠明確，這導(dǎo)致司法實(shí)踐中同案不同判現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重，判決結(jié)果具有很強(qiáng)的不確定性，影響我國司法的權(quán)威。 本文以提供技術(shù)設(shè)備服務(wù)的ISP侵犯著作權(quán)人、鄰接權(quán)人信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)所承擔(dān)的間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任為研究對象，通過對美國ISP間接侵權(quán)司法實(shí)踐，特別是立法實(shí)踐的總結(jié)和借鑒，希望能為我國ISP間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度的構(gòu)建和完善提供可行的理論支持，進(jìn)而為我國的地方司法實(shí)踐提供審判依據(jù)，為相關(guān)行為人提供行動(dòng)指南。本文從以下四部分進(jìn)行論述：第一部分為ISP信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)間接侵權(quán)概述。本部分首先介紹了ISP的概念和我國立法、學(xué)術(shù)界對ISP類型的劃分；其次，歸納總結(jié)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的概念、特點(diǎn)和構(gòu)成要素；再次，闡述ISP間接侵權(quán)的基本概念并詳細(xì)介紹ISP間接侵權(quán)的三個(gè)特征。第二部分從網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)達(dá)國家美國的司法實(shí)踐及立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析介紹ISP信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)間接侵權(quán)的發(fā)展及認(rèn)定。美國作為典型的英美法系國家代表，其版權(quán)法中關(guān)于間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任的認(rèn)定絕大多數(shù)是通過法院判例確定下來的。本部分通過對美國ISP間接侵權(quán)立法實(shí)踐，特別是司法實(shí)踐的總結(jié)，詳細(xì)針對幫助侵權(quán)責(zé)任、替代責(zé)任、索尼規(guī)則、引誘侵權(quán)規(guī)則、避風(fēng)港條款、通知?jiǎng)h除程序等重要制度進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)論述，該部分論述實(shí)際上貫穿的是美國ISP間接侵權(quán)主觀認(rèn)知要件理論的發(fā)展和完善。第三部分從我國司法實(shí)踐和目前的立法方面對ISP間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任進(jìn)行考察。第四部分為我國ISP間接侵權(quán)的評析和完善建議。該部分為本文重點(diǎn)部分，通過前面三部分的論述，對我國理論研究和立法進(jìn)行分析，并從六個(gè)方面提出完善我國ISP間接侵權(quán)制度的建議，包括：完善教唆侵權(quán)要件；正確理解直接經(jīng)濟(jì)利益；細(xì)化及完善避風(fēng)港規(guī)則；明確幫助侵權(quán)和教唆侵權(quán)責(zé)任的獨(dú)立性；確立ISP著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域內(nèi)法律地位；提高信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)位階。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network and network information transmission, Internet transmission, as a new type of work (information), brings unprecedented convenience to the public. However, the relative, electronic works (information) and the Internet bring all sorts of worries to the right people. The Internet has become a well deserved main force, and Internet copyright infringement incidents occur frequently. In the world, the problem of network copyright infringement has become a goal problem in the development process of network law, and the establishment and completion of the indirect tort liability system of network service provider (Internet Service provider, hereinafter referred to as "ISP") Good is the key issue of copyright infringement in the Internet. Therefore, it is very important to properly strengthen the balance of the interests of the copyright owners and the public in the Internet and digital environment, and to standardize the communication of the works on the Internet, such as the Internet and the digital environment, ISP.
The issue of the protection of the right of information network communication has been a hot topic of intellectual property scholars in recent years. This aspect is due to the urgent need of judicial practice. On the other hand, the legislation in this aspect is almost blank in our country, although the Supreme People's Law Institute announced at the end of 2012 the civil correction of the infringement of the right to infringe the information network. The provisions of a number of legal issues applicable to various cases (hereinafter referred to as "2012 < judicial interpretation") greatly promote the legislative improvement of the liability for obstruction of the exclusive right. However, in essence, the theoretical research on the protection of the right to communication of information network is still relatively backward and the application of the law is not clear enough, which leads to the judicial practice. The different cases of the same case are serious, and the verdict is very uncertain, which affects the authority of our judiciary.
This article is based on the ISP infringement of the copyright owner and the indirect infringement of the right to communication of the neighboring rights. Through the summary and reference of the judicial practice of indirect infringement of ISP in the United States, especially the legislative practice, it is hoped that it can provide a feasible way for the construction and improvement of the indirect tort liability system of ISP in China. Theory support, and then for the local judicial practice in our country to provide trial basis, provide action guide for the relevant actors. This article from the following four parts: the first part is the ISP information network communication right indirect infringement overview. This part first introduces the concept of ISP and our national law, the academic circle of ISP type division; secondly, return to the The concept, characteristics and elements of the right of information network communication are summed up. Again, the basic concept of ISP indirect infringement is expounded and the three characteristics of indirect infringement of ISP are introduced in detail. The second part introduces the development and identification of the indirect infringement of the right of communication of the ISP information network from the United States' judicial practice and legislative experience in the developed countries of the network. As a typical representative of the Anglo American legal system, the overwhelming majority of its copyright law on indirect tort liability is determined by the case of the court. Through the summary of the legislative practice of indirect infringement of ISP in the United States, especially the summary of judicial practice, this part is aimed at helping the tort liability, the replacement responsibility, the SONY rule, the temptation of the tort rules, and the avoidance of the wind. The third part of the third part examines the indirect tort liability of ISP from the judicial practice and current legislation in our country. The fourth part is the evaluation of the indirect infringement of ISP in China. This part is the key part of this article. Through the discussion of the previous three parts, this part analyses the theoretical research and legislation of our country, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the indirect infringement system of ISP in our country from six aspects, including: perfecting the instigation elements of tort, correct understanding of the direct economic benefits, refining and perfecting the rules of the haven; and To help the independence of tort liability and instigation of tort liability; to establish the legal status in the field of ISP copyright; to improve the protection of information network dissemination right.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.41
本文編號：2164610
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network and network information transmission, Internet transmission, as a new type of work (information), brings unprecedented convenience to the public. However, the relative, electronic works (information) and the Internet bring all sorts of worries to the right people. The Internet has become a well deserved main force, and Internet copyright infringement incidents occur frequently. In the world, the problem of network copyright infringement has become a goal problem in the development process of network law, and the establishment and completion of the indirect tort liability system of network service provider (Internet Service provider, hereinafter referred to as "ISP") Good is the key issue of copyright infringement in the Internet. Therefore, it is very important to properly strengthen the balance of the interests of the copyright owners and the public in the Internet and digital environment, and to standardize the communication of the works on the Internet, such as the Internet and the digital environment, ISP.
The issue of the protection of the right of information network communication has been a hot topic of intellectual property scholars in recent years. This aspect is due to the urgent need of judicial practice. On the other hand, the legislation in this aspect is almost blank in our country, although the Supreme People's Law Institute announced at the end of 2012 the civil correction of the infringement of the right to infringe the information network. The provisions of a number of legal issues applicable to various cases (hereinafter referred to as "2012 < judicial interpretation") greatly promote the legislative improvement of the liability for obstruction of the exclusive right. However, in essence, the theoretical research on the protection of the right to communication of information network is still relatively backward and the application of the law is not clear enough, which leads to the judicial practice. The different cases of the same case are serious, and the verdict is very uncertain, which affects the authority of our judiciary.
This article is based on the ISP infringement of the copyright owner and the indirect infringement of the right to communication of the neighboring rights. Through the summary and reference of the judicial practice of indirect infringement of ISP in the United States, especially the legislative practice, it is hoped that it can provide a feasible way for the construction and improvement of the indirect tort liability system of ISP in China. Theory support, and then for the local judicial practice in our country to provide trial basis, provide action guide for the relevant actors. This article from the following four parts: the first part is the ISP information network communication right indirect infringement overview. This part first introduces the concept of ISP and our national law, the academic circle of ISP type division; secondly, return to the The concept, characteristics and elements of the right of information network communication are summed up. Again, the basic concept of ISP indirect infringement is expounded and the three characteristics of indirect infringement of ISP are introduced in detail. The second part introduces the development and identification of the indirect infringement of the right of communication of the ISP information network from the United States' judicial practice and legislative experience in the developed countries of the network. As a typical representative of the Anglo American legal system, the overwhelming majority of its copyright law on indirect tort liability is determined by the case of the court. Through the summary of the legislative practice of indirect infringement of ISP in the United States, especially the summary of judicial practice, this part is aimed at helping the tort liability, the replacement responsibility, the SONY rule, the temptation of the tort rules, and the avoidance of the wind. The third part of the third part examines the indirect tort liability of ISP from the judicial practice and current legislation in our country. The fourth part is the evaluation of the indirect infringement of ISP in China. This part is the key part of this article. Through the discussion of the previous three parts, this part analyses the theoretical research and legislation of our country, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the indirect infringement system of ISP in our country from six aspects, including: perfecting the instigation elements of tort, correct understanding of the direct economic benefits, refining and perfecting the rules of the haven; and To help the independence of tort liability and instigation of tort liability; to establish the legal status in the field of ISP copyright; to improve the protection of information network dissemination right.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.41
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)會議論文 前10條
1 李光宇;王典;;論虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)引發(fā)的法律問題[A];2008年度（第六屆）中國法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)論壇論文集（上）[C];2008年
2 王瑩;張金鑫;;版權(quán)技術(shù)保護(hù)措施和法制管理[A];中國新聞技術(shù)工作者聯(lián)合會2012年學(xué)術(shù)年會、五屆四次理事會暨第六屆“王選新聞科學(xué)技術(shù)獎(jiǎng)”的“人才獎(jiǎng)”和“優(yōu)秀論文獎(jiǎng)”頒獎(jiǎng)大會論文集[C];2012年
3 壽步;;論版權(quán)與專利若干基本概念——試議美國版權(quán)法第102條的翻譯[A];專利法研究（1997）[C];1997年
4 張佩鈺;田松;;淺談電子商務(wù)合同的相關(guān)法律問題[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第2輯）[C];2010年
5 張曼;;陜西省文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展模式探析[A];陜西省社會科學(xué)界第三屆(2009)學(xué)術(shù)年會——道路·創(chuàng)新·發(fā)展——“陜西文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展”論壇交流論文選編[C];2009年
6 何偉文;;對因特網(wǎng)鏈接工具的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)分析[A];2000年政府法制研究[C];2000年
7 賀小勇;;論中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)“刑事門檻”爭端的法律問題[A];中國法學(xué)會世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會二○○七年年會論文集[C];2007年
8 楊勇萍;李yN;;行政執(zhí)法模式的創(chuàng)新與思考——以網(wǎng)絡(luò)行政為視角[A];中國法學(xué)會行政法學(xué)研究會2010年會論文集[C];2010年
9 張玲;尚文彥;;對著作權(quán)法中幾個(gè)問題的探討[A];中華全國律協(xié)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)專業(yè)委員會知識產(chǎn)權(quán)論壇暨2001年年會集[C];2001年
10 李德成;;試論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中著作權(quán)集體管理制度的建立與完善[A];中華全國律協(xié)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)專業(yè)委員會知識產(chǎn)權(quán)論壇暨2001年年會集[C];2001年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 楊鴻;民間文藝特別知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的國際立法實(shí)踐研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
2 阮思宇;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利限制[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
3 邵小平;著作權(quán)刑事保護(hù)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
4 魏飛;美術(shù)作品交易的法律規(guī)制[D];中國藝術(shù)研究院;2011年
5 徐妮娜;著作權(quán)的國際私法問題研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2011年
6 夏源;新媒體政府規(guī)制研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年
7 王蘭萍;近代中國著作權(quán)法的成長（1903—1910）[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年
8 余素梅;網(wǎng)上銀行業(yè)務(wù)安全法律保障機(jī)制研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年
9 鄭鵬基;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易爭端解決機(jī)制研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年
10 饒明輝;當(dāng)代西方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)理論的哲學(xué)反思[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年
本文編號：2164610
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2164610.html
最近更新
教材專著
