【摘要】：以中藥為代表的傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)藥產(chǎn)業(yè)是我國(guó)參與國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)力量。長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)，保護(hù)中藥是我國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)界的不變主張，同時(shí)，法學(xué)界也從宏觀的層面對(duì)中藥知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)提出了修改專(zhuān)利法等立法建議，對(duì)專(zhuān)利法缺漏的指責(zé)呼聲一片，已成為法學(xué)界對(duì)中藥產(chǎn)業(yè)予以關(guān)注的普遍態(tài)度。然而，伴隨著中藥產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)際化和現(xiàn)代化的推進(jìn)，學(xué)界不禁開(kāi)始反思：為中藥而修改專(zhuān)利審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是否具備立法合法性以及實(shí)施合理性？中藥的最佳保護(hù)途徑是否就是專(zhuān)利保護(hù)？如何解決本土中藥專(zhuān)利權(quán)國(guó)際化保護(hù)畸弱問(wèn)題？這一系列困惑都說(shuō)明了中藥正面臨無(wú)法可依又缺少知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律解決途徑的尷尬境地。本文從中藥知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的意義、中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)的概念及范圍等基本理論出發(fā)，對(duì)我國(guó)中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀及存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析，并借鑒幾個(gè)域外國(guó)家對(duì)醫(yī)藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，提出了完善我國(guó)中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)制度的建議。 文章共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分介紹了中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)基本理論，對(duì)中藥知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的概念及意義進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要闡述，并進(jìn)一步分析中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)的概念及范圍。 第二部分通過(guò)分析國(guó)際條約和國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)中藥專(zhuān)利的保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀，提出了目前我國(guó)在中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)過(guò)程中存在的一系列問(wèn)題。 第三部分通過(guò)介紹美國(guó)、日本、德國(guó)和韓國(guó)等國(guó)家的醫(yī)藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)法律制度，闡述域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)完善我國(guó)中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)法律制度的啟示。 第四部分提出了完善我國(guó)中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)制度的建議。主要包括：調(diào)整中藥專(zhuān)利的審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、建立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)模式、采用中藥有效部分作為侵權(quán)認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、加強(qiáng)中藥行政保護(hù)同專(zhuān)利保護(hù)的協(xié)調(diào)、提高中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)意識(shí)。
[Abstract]:The traditional medicine industry represented by traditional Chinese medicine is the relative advantage of our country to participate in international competition. For a long time, the protection of traditional Chinese medicine has been the invariable proposition of the medical profession in China. At the same time, the legal profession has also put forward legislative proposals on the protection of intellectual property rights of traditional Chinese medicine from a macro level, such as amending the patent law, and criticizing the patent law for its lack and omission. It has become the general attitude of the legal circles to pay attention to the traditional Chinese medicine industry. However, with the internationalization and modernization of the traditional Chinese medicine industry, scholars can not help but start to reflect: whether the revision of patent examination standards for traditional Chinese medicine has the legitimacy of legislation and the rationality of implementation? Is patent protection the best way to protect traditional Chinese medicine? How to solve the international protection of local patent rights of traditional Chinese medicine? This series of puzzles indicate that traditional Chinese medicine is facing the awkward situation of being unable to abide by and lack of intellectual property rights legal solution. Based on the basic theories of intellectual property protection of traditional Chinese medicine and the concept and scope of patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine, this paper analyzes the present situation and existing problems of patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine in China. Based on the experiences of several overseas countries, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the patent protection system of Chinese traditional medicine. The article is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the basic theory of patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine, briefly expounds the concept and significance of intellectual property protection of traditional Chinese medicine, and further analyzes the concept and scope of patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine. In the second part, by analyzing the current situation of the protection of traditional Chinese medicine patents by international treaties and domestic laws, a series of problems existing in the process of patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine are put forward. The third part introduces the legal system of patent protection in the United States, Japan, Germany and Korea, and expounds the enlightenment of the extraterritorial experience to improve the legal system of patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine in China. The fourth part puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the patent protection system of Chinese traditional medicine. It mainly includes adjusting the examination standard of Chinese medicine patent, establishing standardized patent protection mode of traditional Chinese medicine, adopting the effective part of Chinese medicine as the standard of infringement, strengthening the coordination between administrative protection and patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine, and raising the consciousness of patent protection of traditional Chinese medicine.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.4

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 程云華;;初探外觀設(shè)計(jì)專(zhuān)利產(chǎn)品之美感[A];專(zhuān)利法研究（2010）[C];2011年

2 潘中毅;;論發(fā)明專(zhuān)利臨時(shí)保護(hù)的法律效力——兼評(píng)最高人民法院(2011)民提字第259～262號(hào)判決[A];發(fā)展知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)業(yè)，支撐創(chuàng)新型國(guó)家建設(shè)-2012年中華全國(guó)專(zhuān)利代理人協(xié)會(huì)年會(huì)第三屆知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)論壇論文選編(第一部分)[C];2011年

3 米嵐;朱曉卓;田侃;;衛(wèi)生法律視角的中藥專(zhuān)利保護(hù)分析[A];2011年浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)醫(yī)學(xué)倫理學(xué)與衛(wèi)生法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2011年

4 劉耘;;專(zhuān)利新穎性及其在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略中的應(yīng)用[A];專(zhuān)利法研究（2006）[C];2007年

5 游云;肖詩(shī)鷹;;中藥復(fù)方專(zhuān)利保護(hù)及侵權(quán)分析[A];專(zhuān)利法研究（2007）[C];2008年

6 張寒;;淺析專(zhuān)利權(quán)濫用[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第1輯）[C];2010年

7 楊鳳祥;;論域名爭(zhēng)議的解決[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第2輯）[C];2010年

8 韓穎;;專(zhuān)利權(quán)濫用的試界定[A];2009中華全國(guó)律師協(xié)會(huì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專(zhuān)業(yè)委員會(huì)年會(huì)暨中國(guó)律師知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)高層論壇論文集（下）[C];2009年

9 羅勝華;;侵害知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為的過(guò)濾判定[A];探索社會(huì)主義司法規(guī)律與完善民商事法律制度研究——全國(guó)法院第23屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募ㄏ拢C];2011年

10 侯麗娜;;了解現(xiàn)有技術(shù)/現(xiàn)有設(shè)計(jì)與專(zhuān)利申請(qǐng)[A];2013年中華全國(guó)專(zhuān)利代理人協(xié)會(huì)年會(huì)暨第四屆知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)論壇論文匯編第三部分[C];2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 潘曉寧;商標(biāo)權(quán)限制制度比較研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 沈強(qiáng);TRIPS協(xié)議與商業(yè)秘密民事救濟(jì)制度比較研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

3 阮思宇;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利限制[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

4 張健;專(zhuān)利權(quán)濫用及其法律規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

5 郭湫君;企業(yè)專(zhuān)利侵權(quán)訴訟預(yù)警機(jī)制與應(yīng)對(duì)研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

6 姚王信;企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)融資研究：理論、模型與應(yīng)用[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

7 董火民;中國(guó)古代抄書(shū)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

8 蔣虹;論商號(hào)及其法律保護(hù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

9 鄒琳;英國(guó)專(zhuān)利制度發(fā)展史研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2011年

10 潘牧天;民事訴權(quán)濫用的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2149513