【摘要】：在世界經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化進(jìn)程的不斷推進(jìn)下,各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)越來(lái)越緊密的聯(lián)系在一起,自由貿(mào)易與本國(guó)民族經(jīng)濟(jì)保護(hù)成為日益凸顯的矛盾,體現(xiàn)貿(mào)易自由的平行進(jìn)口與附加商品之上的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)為其中的焦點(diǎn)。著作權(quán)取得的自動(dòng)性和權(quán)利保護(hù)的國(guó)際化,使其更易發(fā)生平行進(jìn)口現(xiàn)象。各國(guó)基于自身國(guó)內(nèi)貿(mào)易狀況,通過(guò)“發(fā)行權(quán)用盡原則”的適用,對(duì)其做出允許或禁止的規(guī)定。我國(guó)是世界貿(mào)易大國(guó),在加入WTO之后,著作權(quán)平行進(jìn)口的發(fā)生機(jī)制已經(jīng)形成,面臨的有關(guān)著作權(quán)平行進(jìn)口糾紛也不斷增加。如何在國(guó)際條約的框架下,在發(fā)展我國(guó)著作權(quán)法律制度的同時(shí),比較分析國(guó)外相關(guān)制度與實(shí)踐,推進(jìn)和完善我國(guó)著作權(quán)平行進(jìn)口中“發(fā)行權(quán)用盡原則”的研究與立法,是需要重點(diǎn)解決的一個(gè)問(wèn)題。 因此,本文試圖從“發(fā)行權(quán)用盡原則”在著作權(quán)平行進(jìn)口適用的基本理論入手,比較分析世界主要國(guó)家的立法與實(shí)踐情況,對(duì)我國(guó)著作權(quán)“發(fā)行權(quán)用盡原則”的現(xiàn)狀加以考量。最終,從我國(guó)立場(chǎng)出發(fā),尋求我國(guó)著作權(quán)平行進(jìn)口中“發(fā)行權(quán)用盡原則”適用的最佳方式,并提出相關(guān)立法建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of the world economic integration, the economy of every country is more and more closely linked, and the contradiction between free trade and national economic protection becomes more and more prominent. The protection of intellectual property rights over parallel imports and additional commodities is the focus of trade freedom. The automatism of copyright acquisition and the internationalization of right protection make it easier to import parallel. According to their own domestic trade situation, countries adopt the principle of exhaustion of Circulation Rights to permit or prohibit it. China is a big trade country in the world. After joining WTO, the mechanism of parallel import of copyright has been formed, and the disputes about parallel import of copyright have been increasing. How to develop the legal system of copyright in our country under the framework of international treaties, at the same time, compare and analyze the relevant systems and practices in foreign countries, and promote and perfect the research and legislation of "the principle of exhaustion of distribution rights" in parallel import of copyright in our country. It is a problem that needs to be solved. Therefore, this article attempts to start with the basic theory that "the principle of exhaustion of distribution rights" applies to the parallel import of copyright, compares and analyzes the legislation and practice of the major countries in the world, and considers the present situation of the "principle of exhaustion of distribution rights" in our country. Finally, from the standpoint of our country, we seek the best way to apply the principle of exhaustion of distribution rights in parallel import of copyright in our country, and put forward some relevant legislative suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮曉青;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭問(wèn)題研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

2 邵琳;;版權(quán)窮竭的空間效力范圍與平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題研究[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

3 鄭智武;;表演者發(fā)行權(quán)之立法比較芻議[J];大連大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

4 黃彥;;對(duì)中國(guó)平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題的新思考[J];大連民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

5 張敏;;論版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口中“首次銷(xiāo)售原則”的適用 從美國(guó)聯(lián)邦最高法院好市多訴歐米茄案談起[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年12期

6 張岱元;;對(duì)著作權(quán)法中權(quán)利窮竭制度的思考[J];福建法學(xué);2006年03期

7 韓寧;李玉玲;;從著作權(quán)權(quán)利窮竭看知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的限制[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年29期

8 獨(dú)玉潔;;發(fā)行權(quán)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中適用途徑的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年22期

9 張永艾;權(quán)利窮竭原則探究——兼論平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題[J];河北法學(xué);2004年03期

10 嚴(yán)捷;版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題及其經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)角度的思考[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2148547