論中國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定制度
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-07-24 07:46
【摘要】:隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)迅猛發(fā)展,國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力不斷加強(qiáng),我國(guó)綜合國(guó)力上升,馳名商標(biāo)的關(guān)注度越來(lái)越高,今天我們要從中國(guó)制造向中國(guó)創(chuàng)造轉(zhuǎn)變,在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域就要求我們有自己獨(dú)特的民族特色,有自己的民族企業(yè),有自己的馳名商標(biāo),馳名商標(biāo)的認(rèn)定是其保護(hù)的前提,所以探索中國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)的司法認(rèn)定制度是很有必要的,這也是國(guó)際大潮流所趨。 本文共分五章進(jìn)行論述分析。 第一章簡(jiǎn)單地介紹了研究此問(wèn)題的背景、意義,介紹了目前國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)于此問(wèn)題的研究情況,本文所運(yùn)用的研究方法以及寫(xiě)作思路等。 第二章馳名商標(biāo)概述,,從與馳名商標(biāo)相似的幾個(gè)概念入手,分析馳名商標(biāo)的法律含義,然后分析馳名商標(biāo)的法律特征,讓讀者更加深刻的了解馳名商標(biāo)。 第三章闡述了我國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定制度的現(xiàn)狀,分析了馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定的原則,主要從個(gè)案認(rèn)定、被動(dòng)認(rèn)定和按需認(rèn)定三個(gè)原則談起。原則之后又對(duì)馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定的依據(jù)作了分析,分別從國(guó)際、國(guó)內(nèi)兩方面進(jìn)行了分析。 第四章則向讀者闡述了我國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定制度存在的問(wèn)題,對(duì)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了研究分析,這是本篇論文的第一個(gè)重點(diǎn)核心內(nèi)容。該部分從馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)混亂、制度確立不完善、司法認(rèn)定與行政認(rèn)定沖突、存在“虛假訴訟”方面分別作了詳細(xì)的分析闡述,穿插了案例作了詳細(xì)貼切的論證。這一部分為本篇論文的第二個(gè)重點(diǎn)核心內(nèi)容即第五章作了鋪墊。 第五章承接第四章,針對(duì)性地提出了當(dāng)下我國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定制度問(wèn)題的解決策略,針對(duì)如何統(tǒng)一完善認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、協(xié)調(diào)司法認(rèn)定與行政認(rèn)定的關(guān)系、防范與規(guī)制虛假訴訟提出了相對(duì)完善的解決方法。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy and society, the continuous strengthening of international competitiveness, the rise of China's comprehensive national strength, and the increasing attention paid to well-known trademarks, today we are going to transform from made in China to created in China. In the field of intellectual property rights, we are required to have our own unique national characteristics, have our own national enterprises, have our own well-known trademarks, and the recognition of well-known trademarks is the prerequisite for its protection. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, which is also the trend of international trend. This article is divided into five chapters to discuss and analyze. The first chapter briefly introduces the background and significance of the research, introduces the current domestic and foreign research on this issue, the research methods used in this paper and the writing ideas, etc. The second chapter is the outline of well-known trademark, starting with several concepts similar to well-known trademark, analyzing the legal meaning of well-known trademark, and then analyzing the legal characteristics of well-known trademark, so that readers can understand the well-known trademark more deeply. The third chapter expounds the current situation of the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the principles of judicial recognition of well-known trademarks, mainly from the three principles of case determination, passive recognition and on-demand recognition. After the principle, the basis of judicial recognition of well-known trademark is analyzed, from the international and domestic aspects. The fourth chapter expounds the problems existing in the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the problems, which is the first key content of this paper. In this part, the standard of well-known trademark judicial identification is confused, the system is not perfect, the conflict between judicial confirmation and administrative confirmation, the existence of "false litigation" is analyzed in detail, and the case is discussed in detail. This part paves the way for the second key content of this paper, the fifth chapter. The fifth chapter carries on the fourth chapter, puts forward the solution strategy of the judicial cognizance system of well-known trademark in our country, aiming at how to unify and perfect the cognizance standard, coordinate the relationship between the judicial cognizance and the administrative cognizance. Prevention and regulation of false litigation put forward a relatively perfect solution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D923.43
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy and society, the continuous strengthening of international competitiveness, the rise of China's comprehensive national strength, and the increasing attention paid to well-known trademarks, today we are going to transform from made in China to created in China. In the field of intellectual property rights, we are required to have our own unique national characteristics, have our own national enterprises, have our own well-known trademarks, and the recognition of well-known trademarks is the prerequisite for its protection. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, which is also the trend of international trend. This article is divided into five chapters to discuss and analyze. The first chapter briefly introduces the background and significance of the research, introduces the current domestic and foreign research on this issue, the research methods used in this paper and the writing ideas, etc. The second chapter is the outline of well-known trademark, starting with several concepts similar to well-known trademark, analyzing the legal meaning of well-known trademark, and then analyzing the legal characteristics of well-known trademark, so that readers can understand the well-known trademark more deeply. The third chapter expounds the current situation of the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the principles of judicial recognition of well-known trademarks, mainly from the three principles of case determination, passive recognition and on-demand recognition. After the principle, the basis of judicial recognition of well-known trademark is analyzed, from the international and domestic aspects. The fourth chapter expounds the problems existing in the judicial recognition system of well-known trademarks in China, and analyzes the problems, which is the first key content of this paper. In this part, the standard of well-known trademark judicial identification is confused, the system is not perfect, the conflict between judicial confirmation and administrative confirmation, the existence of "false litigation" is analyzed in detail, and the case is discussed in detail. This part paves the way for the second key content of this paper, the fifth chapter. The fifth chapter carries on the fourth chapter, puts forward the solution strategy of the judicial cognizance system of well-known trademark in our country, aiming at how to unify and perfect the cognizance standard, coordinate the relationship between the judicial cognizance and the administrative cognizance. Prevention and regulation of false litigation put forward a relatively perfect solution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D923.43
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 何鵬;;馳名商標(biāo)“異化”之治理[J];中華商標(biāo);2008年12期
2 馮曉青;鄧晶晶;;我國(guó)注冊(cè)馳名商標(biāo)狀況實(shí)證研究與理論思考——基于1983~2011年注冊(cè)于中國(guó)的馳名商標(biāo)的文獻(xiàn)與信息分析[J];武陵學(xué)刊;2012年02期
3 周俊強(qiáng);;我國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定的原則、條件與基準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年05期
4 儲(chǔ)敏;;地方政府實(shí)施商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略的省思[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年02期
5 蘇U
本文編號(hào):2140698
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2140698.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著