本文選題：技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn) + 專利權(quán)��； 參考：《哈爾濱工程大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的不斷加深,技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)作為聯(lián)系各地區(qū)行業(yè)領(lǐng)域的技術(shù)紐帶與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的結(jié)合愈加緊密。我國在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中也不斷加快標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化進(jìn)程,使得我國技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)合問題更加重要。目前我國大多數(shù)學(xué)者在研究技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題上,大多著眼于如何利用現(xiàn)有的法律制度限制專利權(quán)的濫用問題,然而如果只一味思考如何限制對手的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略而不融入其中積極參與競爭,這只會使得中國的企業(yè)們永遠(yuǎn)處于跟隨外國企業(yè)的步伐亦步亦趨的被動地位,因此,中國企業(yè)應(yīng)提高自主創(chuàng)新意識,積極參與我國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化活動,以提升企業(yè)的國際競爭實(shí)力。技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是一種公共產(chǎn)品,隨著知識經(jīng)濟(jì)的進(jìn)步,對公共領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的私有性知識產(chǎn)權(quán)加以保護(hù)卻又能保持市場競爭的良好秩序,這是值得標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制定者和學(xué)者們認(rèn)真思考的問題。筆者通過比較研究、價(jià)值衡量和案例分析的方法對技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中專利權(quán)的保護(hù)與限制問題予以探討、分析,從這二者相互融合的動因入手分析技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利權(quán)在本質(zhì)屬性上的一致性,明確技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利的結(jié)合是科技進(jìn)步與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的必然趨勢;另一方面,通過以利益平衡原則為理論基礎(chǔ),建立起有效的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,從完善我國關(guān)于技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中涉及專利的法律制度以及建立技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的專利審查機(jī)制兩方面緩和二者的矛盾沖突,加快我國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化進(jìn)程,為未來中國企業(yè)的發(fā)展、中國經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展做一些力所能及的努力,提出相關(guān)的法律意見。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of economic integration, technical standards are becoming more and more closely linked with intellectual property. In the process of economic development, China also accelerates the process of standardization, which makes the integration of technical standards and intellectual property more important. At present, most scholars in our country are focusing on how to use the existing legal system to limit the abuse of patent right in the research of intellectual property rights in technical standards. However, if we only think about how to restrict our competitors' intellectual property strategy without actively participating in the competition, it will only keep Chinese enterprises in a passive position of following the footsteps of foreign enterprises, so, Chinese enterprises should improve their consciousness of independent innovation and actively participate in the standardization activities of our country in order to enhance the international competitive strength of enterprises. Technical standard is a kind of public goods. With the progress of knowledge economy, the private intellectual property rights in the public domain can be protected while maintaining a good order of market competition, which is a problem worthy to be seriously considered by the standard-setters and scholars. By means of comparative study, value measurement and case study, the author discusses the protection and limitation of patent right in technical standard. It is the inevitable trend of scientific and technological progress and economic development to analyze the consistency of technical standard and patent right on the essential attribute from the motive of the fusion of the two, and to make clear the combination of technical standard and patent; on the other hand, it is the inevitable trend of scientific and technological progress and economic development. By taking the principle of balance of interests as the theoretical basis and establishing an effective coordination mechanism between technical standards and patents, From the aspects of perfecting the legal system concerning patents in technical standards and establishing the patent examination mechanism of technical standards, the contradiction and conflict between the two should be alleviated, and the process of standardization in our country should be quickened so as to promote the development of Chinese enterprises in the future. China's economic development to make some efforts within the limits of the relevant legal advice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐元;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相結(jié)合的趨勢及原因分析[J];發(fā)展研究;2010年10期

2 馬海生;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織的FRAND許可政策實(shí)證分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年02期

3 季任天;王明卓;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的專利披露原則[J];法治研究;2008年12期

4 蔣坡;;論技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利技術(shù)之融合與沖突[J];政治與法律;2008年08期

5 張曦;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、專利池與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用辨析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年04期

6 李麗君;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利融合發(fā)展研究[J];現(xiàn)代財(cái)經(jīng)(天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2007年09期

7 馮曉青;;企業(yè)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與專利戰(zhàn)略研究[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2007年04期

8 陳欣;;國外企業(yè)利用專利聯(lián)盟運(yùn)作技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的實(shí)踐及其啟示[J];科研管理;2007年04期

9 丁蔚;;Rambus專利侵權(quán)訴訟與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的管理[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年02期

10 史少華;;披露與許可——困擾標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化工作的兩大難題[J];信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2007年Z1期

，

本文編號：2114526