本文選題：打包許可 + 壟斷搭售��； 參考：《湘潭大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：搭售行為一直是知識產(chǎn)權領域一個十分重要的課題，在當今經(jīng)濟社會聯(lián)系越來越密切的大環(huán)境之下，不管是我國政府還是我國企業(yè)都應該重視搭售行為在社會經(jīng)濟生活中的影響。因為作為專利池最重要的運行模式，系統(tǒng)而謹慎地研究搭售行為，是我們積極應對國外專利池沖擊的應有之意。但是現(xiàn)實問題是，我國關于搭售行為的系統(tǒng)研究較少，所以，對搭售行為進行一次系統(tǒng)研究實屬必要。 基于搭售行為對專利池的重要性，，本文首先簡單地介紹了專利池。通過對專利池的介紹引出一攬子打包許可。對一攬子打包許可的積極效益分析主要是從打包許可產(chǎn)生的實踐與理論基礎著手。闡明打包許可的積極效益后，又指出，打包許可還會導致被人詬病的搭售行為，進而引出全文的寫作核心——搭售行為。 在論述搭售行為時，對搭售定義的介紹引入多學科，綜合地介紹了法學和其他學科領域有關搭售的定義，通過綜合不同領域的意見進而得出自己對搭售的見解。在介紹完搭售的相關知識以后，著重探討搭售行為的正反兩方面的作用。在敘述搭售行為的消極作用時則主要是從搭售行為與反壟斷法的關系等角度入手的，在這部分寫作中，本文引用了大量地法條以及相關案列，讓文章更具說服力。同時在論文寫作過程中提出自己的觀點：對搭售行為進行分類的必要性與重要性。在論述壟斷搭售行為與市場支配力時，運用了比較分析法和案例法來支撐文中觀點。在論述搭售行為的積極效益則是從壟斷豁免制度著手，在這部分寫作中探討了搭售行為符合豁免制度的原因，以及各國搭售豁免制度的相關規(guī)定和搭售豁免的案例。在文末對如何完善我國搭售豁免制度提出了自己的兩點看法和建議：一是積極吸取國外壟斷豁免制度的優(yōu)秀立法，特別是歐盟立法中對壟斷豁免的顏色分類，就很值得我國立法去借鑒；二是在審查制度上，堅持事前審查和事后審查相結合的方法，盡量把壟斷搭售豁免的消極影響降到最小化。
[Abstract]:Tying up has always been a very important topic in the field of intellectual property rights. Under the environment of increasingly close economic and social ties, Both Chinese government and Chinese enterprises should attach importance to the influence of tying behavior in social and economic life. As the most important operation mode of patent pool, it is our intention to study the tying behavior systematically and carefully. However, the practical problem is that there are few systematic studies on tying behavior in China, so it is necessary to conduct a systematic study on tying behavior. Based on the importance of tying behavior to patent pool, this paper introduces patent pool briefly. The introduction of the patent pool leads to a package license. The positive benefit analysis of package license is mainly based on the practice and theory of package license. After expounding the positive effect of packaging license, it is pointed out that packaging license will also lead to the criticized tying behavior, which leads to the writing core of the full text-tying behavior. When discussing the behavior of tying, the definition of tying is introduced, and the definition of tying in law and other disciplines is introduced synthetically. By synthesizing the opinions of different fields, the author obtains his own opinions on tying. After introducing the related knowledge of tying, this paper mainly discusses the positive and negative effects of tying behavior. When narrating the negative effect of tying behavior, it is mainly from the angle of the relationship between tying behavior and anti-monopoly law. In this part of writing, this article quotes a large number of articles and related cases, which makes the article more convincing. At the same time, in the process of writing, I put forward my own point of view: the necessity and importance of classifying tying behavior. In the discussion of monopoly tying and market power, comparative analysis and case law are used to support the point of view in this paper. In this part, the author discusses the reasons why the tying behavior conforms to the exemption system, and the relevant regulations of the system and the cases of the exemption. At the end of the paper, the author puts forward his own two views and suggestions on how to perfect the exemption system of tying sale in our country. One is to actively absorb the excellent legislation of foreign monopoly exemption system, especially the color classification of monopoly exemption in EU legislation. The second is to insist on the combination of prior review and ex post examination in order to minimize the negative impact of monopoly tying exemption.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 杜波;王仕平;;我國反壟斷法草案的幾個問題[J];江西行政學院學報;2006年S2期

2 張平;;專利聯(lián)營之反壟斷規(guī)制分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2007年03期

3 丁飛;;淺論專利池的模塊化、分級化管理[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟信息;2012年06期

4 詹映;朱雪忠;;標準和專利戰(zhàn)的主角——專利池解析[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2007年01期

本文編號：2114871