本文選題：商標(biāo) + 商標(biāo)權(quán)　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易的發(fā)展，商標(biāo)許可使用現(xiàn)象屢見不鮮。長期以來，法學(xué)界對于商標(biāo)法及理論研究都是以商標(biāo)權(quán)的取得、限制、侵權(quán)及其救濟(jì)規(guī)則為主，商標(biāo)許可使用問題一直未能得到足夠重視。本文力圖對商標(biāo)許可使用過程中立法和實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問題進(jìn)行審視和分析，以便發(fā)現(xiàn)和解決問題，期望能有益于商標(biāo)許可使用的理論研究和制度完善。本文分為五個(gè)部分： 第一部分：我國商標(biāo)許可使用制度的歷史沿革。該部分主要采用歷史研究法，回顧了我國商標(biāo)許可使用制度的發(fā)展歷程，主要對清道光五年上海綺藻堂布業(yè)公所為了管理同行業(yè)各個(gè)布商使用布匹商標(biāo)制訂的“牌律”、1904年清政府正式頒布的我國第一部正式的商標(biāo)法規(guī)《商標(biāo)注冊試辦章程》、1982年通過的《商標(biāo)法》以及日后的各次修訂中關(guān)于商標(biāo)許可使用的規(guī)定做了介紹。從上述我國商標(biāo)法律法規(guī)的制定、修改，可以看到我國商標(biāo)許可使用制度的發(fā)展軌跡。 第二部分：商標(biāo)許可使用的基本理論。首先對商標(biāo)許可使用進(jìn)行了界定；其次介紹了商標(biāo)許可使用的分類，具體可分為獨(dú)占許可、排他許可、普通許可；再次對商標(biāo)許可使用從商標(biāo)權(quán)是私權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)是財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)的無形性三個(gè)角度對商標(biāo)許可使用進(jìn)行了法理分析；最后論述了商標(biāo)許可使用的意義。 第三部分：商標(biāo)許可使用制度比較研究。首先從程序上進(jìn)行分析，美國未規(guī)定商標(biāo)許可使用要向商標(biāo)主管部門進(jìn)行登記，丹麥、白俄羅斯等國家將登記作為商標(biāo)許可使用合同生效的要件，比利時(shí)、我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)、歐盟等登記作為對抗第三人的要件，英國將登記作為獲得損害賠償金或收益交代的要件；其次商標(biāo)許可使用應(yīng)加以限制，如應(yīng)對共有商標(biāo)、證明商標(biāo)、集體商標(biāo)、防御商標(biāo)的許可使用有所限制。 第四部分：我國商標(biāo)許可使用制度存在的問題，主要體現(xiàn)在六個(gè)方面：第一，商標(biāo)許可使用合同備案制度亟待改革，從備案的效力和內(nèi)容、備案的程序兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了分析；第二，商標(biāo)許可使用未以適當(dāng)方式公示；第三，未規(guī)定商標(biāo)許可使用的效力；第四，許可人和被許可人的義務(wù)、法律責(zé)任不明確；第五，關(guān)于同一商標(biāo)許可和轉(zhuǎn)讓共同發(fā)生時(shí)的規(guī)定過于簡單；第六，商標(biāo)許可使用合同終止后問題的處理不合理。 第五部分：完善我國的商標(biāo)許可使用制度，可以從以下幾個(gè)方面努力：第一，改革商標(biāo)許可使用合同備案制度，具體要明確備案的效力、改變備案的內(nèi)容，還應(yīng)增設(shè)變更備案、終止備案程序；第二，引入商標(biāo)許可使用公告制度；第三，明確商標(biāo)許可使用的效力；第四，完善許可人的義務(wù)、法律責(zé)任；第五，，增加同一商標(biāo)許可和轉(zhuǎn)讓共同發(fā)生時(shí)的規(guī)定；第六，妥善處理商標(biāo)許可合同終止后的問題。
[Abstract]:With the development of intellectual property trade, trademark licensing is common. For a long time, trademark law and theoretical research have focused on the acquisition, limitation, infringement and relief of trademark rights, and the issue of trademark licensing has not been paid enough attention to. This paper tries to examine and analyze the problems in the legislation and practice of trademark licensing, in order to find and solve the problems, hoping to be beneficial to the theoretical research and the perfection of the system of trademark licensing. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part: the history of trademark licensing system in China. This part mainly adopts the method of historical research and reviews the development course of trademark licensing system in China. In order to manage the "brand law" made by all cloth manufacturers in the same trade in order to manage the use of cloth trademarks by all cloth manufacturers in Shanghai Qizao Tong cloth Company in the five years of Qing Dao Guang, the first official trademark law < trademark registration was officially promulgated by the Qing government in 1904. The articles of association, the Trademark Law adopted in 1982 and the regulations on trademark licensing in subsequent amendments are introduced. From the above laws and regulations, we can see the development of trademark licensing system. The second part: the basic theory of trademark licensing. Firstly, it defines the use of trademark license; secondly, it introduces the classification of trademark licensing, which can be divided into exclusive license, exclusive license and general license; thirdly, trademark license is private right, trademark right is property right, This paper analyzes the legal principle of trademark licensing from three aspects of the invisibility of trademark rights, and finally discusses the significance of trademark licensing. The third part: the comparative study of trademark licensing system. First of all, from a procedural point of view, the United States has not stipulated that trademark licensing should be registered with the trademark authorities. Denmark, Belarus and other countries have made registration as an essential element for the entry into force of a trademark license contract. Belgium, Taiwan, China, Registration in the European Union is an important element against a third party, and the United Kingdom regards registration as an important element for obtaining damages or giving an account of the proceeds; secondly, the licensing of trademarks should be restricted, such as joint trademarks, certification trademarks, collective trademarks, The licensed use of defensive trademarks is limited. The fourth part: the problems existing in the trademark licensing system in China, mainly reflected in six aspects: first, the trademark licensing contract filing system needs to be reformed urgently, from the effectiveness and content of the record, the procedure of filing are analyzed. Second, the trademark license is not publicized in an appropriate manner; third, the validity of the trademark license is not specified; fourth, the obligations of the licensor and the licensee are not clear; and the legal liability is not clear. It is too simple for the same trademark license and assignment to occur together; sixth, the handling of the problem after the termination of the trademark license contract is unreasonable. Part V: to improve the trademark licensing system in China, we can make efforts in the following aspects: first, to reform the trademark licensing and use contract filing system, specifically to clarify the effectiveness of filing, to change the content of the record, and to add changes to the record. Termination of the filing process; second, the introduction of trademark licensing announcement system; third, the effectiveness of trademark licensing; fourth, improve the obligations of the licensor, legal responsibility; fifth, Add the same trademark license and assignment of the joint occurrence of the provisions; sixthly, properly deal with the trademark licensing contract after the termination.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王興富;;商標(biāo)使用許可須慎行[J];中華商標(biāo);2006年06期

2 李仁瑩;;商標(biāo)使用許可中的品質(zhì)控制[J];中華商標(biāo);2007年01期

3 夏姍姍;;許可使用商標(biāo)如何趨利避害[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年02期

4 李友根;注冊商標(biāo)許可人的監(jiān)督義務(wù)[J];法學(xué)雜志;1997年05期

5 李揚(yáng);;注冊商標(biāo)不使用撤銷制度中的“商標(biāo)使用”界定——中國與日本相關(guān)立法、司法之比較[J];法學(xué);2009年10期

6 何躍飛;劉羽平;;商標(biāo)法視角下的“達(dá)娃之爭”[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年05期

7 劉文娟;優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)及其制度價(jià)值[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

8 顧心悅;;“王老吉”敗了誰的火 “王老吉”商標(biāo)糾紛的法律解讀[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年06期

9 李偉華;;“王老吉”商標(biāo)紛爭的是是非非[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年09期

10 龐倩影;;“王老吉”商標(biāo)爭奪戰(zhàn)[J];法人;2012年01期

本文編號：2023249