本文選題：商標(biāo)權(quán) + 外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)�。� 參考：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：商標(biāo)權(quán)與外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)的競合是我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利競合中最為常見的一種權(quán)利競合，其權(quán)利競合產(chǎn)生的原因主要是由我國行政授權(quán)機(jī)關(guān)的審查制度缺陷所致。同時(shí)，在同一客體上并存兩種權(quán)利也為權(quán)利的行使以及利益的分配帶來了一定的矛盾。因此，應(yīng)當(dāng)如何正確認(rèn)識和協(xié)調(diào)商標(biāo)權(quán)與外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)競合問題，也就成為我國理論界以及法律實(shí)踐中的熱點(diǎn)問題。本文通過對具體案例進(jìn)行分析，總結(jié)出我國法律實(shí)踐中對處理商標(biāo)權(quán)與外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)競合存在的諸多問題，并提出相應(yīng)的解決建議，為解決我國商標(biāo)權(quán)與外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)的競合問題提供一點(diǎn)借鑒。 文章采取遞進(jìn)式寫作手法，首先，通過引入案例提出問題，并對所提問題分章研究。其次，文章將商標(biāo)權(quán)與外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)的競合做了類型化分析，明確提出相容性競合與不相容性競合的區(qū)分，從而為侵權(quán)行為的認(rèn)定提供前提條件，即在相容性競合的前提下，因?yàn)閮煞N權(quán)利的主體在權(quán)利申請之時(shí)為同一人，并不存在侵犯他人在先權(quán)利的情形，所以，兩種權(quán)利的取得均屬實(shí)質(zhì)性的合法取得，，不能被認(rèn)定為是一種侵權(quán)行為；而在不相容性競合的情況下，因其在后權(quán)利的取得是以侵犯他人在先權(quán)利為基礎(chǔ)取得的，其權(quán)利的取得實(shí)質(zhì)上是一種形式上合法（實(shí)質(zhì)上違法）的行為，因而其在后權(quán)利的取得應(yīng)當(dāng)被認(rèn)定為是一種侵犯他人在先權(quán)利的行為。這一部分的內(nèi)容也是本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)所在。最后，通過以上分析，提出對不同類型的商標(biāo)權(quán)與外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利權(quán)競合適用不同的解決方法予以保護(hù)，以此來填補(bǔ)保護(hù)在先權(quán)利原則的不足之處，并為以后類似案件的處理，提供一種可行性的解決辦法。
[Abstract]:The concurrence of trademark right and design patent right is the most common right concurrence in the competition of intellectual property rights in China. The reason of its right concurrence is mainly caused by the defect of the examination system of the administrative authority of our country. At the same time, the coexistence of two kinds of rights on the same object also brings about the exercise of rights and the distribution of interests. Therefore, how to correctly recognize and coordinate the competition between trademark rights and design patent rights is a hot issue in the theoretical and legal practice of our country. Through the analysis of specific cases, this paper summarizes the existence of the competition of trademark right and design patent right in the legal practice of our country. Many problems, and put forward corresponding solutions, to provide a reference for solving the concurrence of trademark rights and design patents in China.
In this paper, a progressive writing technique is adopted, first of all, by introducing a case to put forward a question, and to study the question in a chapter. Secondly, the article makes a typed analysis of the concurrence of the trademark rights and the patent right of the appearance design, and clearly puts forward the distinction between compatibility and incompatibility, thus providing the prerequisite for the identification of the tort. On the premise of capacitive concurrence, because the subject of the two rights is the same as the same person when the right application is applied, there is no violation of the first right of others. Therefore, the acquisition of the two rights is a substantive legal acquisition and can not be regarded as a tort; in the case of non capacitive concurrence, it is achieved in the post rights. It is based on the infringement of the prior rights of others, and its right is essentially a form of legal (in substance), so the acquisition of its right in the post should be regarded as a violation of the first right of others. The content of this part is also the innovation of this article. Different types of trademark rights and design patents are competing to apply different solutions to protect them, so as to fill in the shortcomings of the principle of protecting the prior rights, and provide a feasible solution for the treatment of similar cases in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.43;D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡杰;馳名商標(biāo)的反淡化保護(hù)[J];中華商標(biāo);1996年01期

2 譚華霖;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突協(xié)調(diào)之法理與制度因素[J];比較法研究;2011年03期

3 王偉民;注冊商標(biāo)與外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利競合侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[J];中國工商管理研究;2002年01期

4 孔祥俊;;論解決知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的民事司法與行政程序之界分[J];河南社會科學(xué);2005年06期

5 吳漢東;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)論[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年01期

6 李永明,張振杰;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利競合研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年02期

7 易繼明;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的觀念:類型化及法律適用[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年03期

8 曹新明;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突協(xié)調(diào)原則[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年03期

9 馮曉青,楊利華;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突及其解決原則[J];法學(xué)論壇;2001年03期

10 楊立新;;論競合侵權(quán)行為[J];清華法學(xué);2013年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 梁興國;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：2005761