本文選題：商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡 + 反向假冒�。� 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)立法在商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡的規(guī)定方面仍處于空白狀態(tài)。電子產(chǎn)品如手機(jī)翻新業(yè)務(wù)的產(chǎn)生，對(duì)我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)的法律保護(hù)領(lǐng)域提出了新的挑戰(zhàn)。手機(jī)二手市場(chǎng)目前無(wú)論是法律制度還是責(zé)任主體上均缺失，不利于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)及環(huán)境資源的保護(hù)。 電子產(chǎn)品翻新行為能否援引商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則，在理論和實(shí)務(wù)中都存在諸多爭(zhēng)論。關(guān)于電子產(chǎn)品翻新業(yè)務(wù)方面的法律法規(guī)如何配套落實(shí)，目前尚無(wú)定論。引入商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則有其合理性和必要性。本文共分四部分： 商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則的范圍。通過(guò)對(duì)商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則的權(quán)利范圍的探討，闡述商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡的相關(guān)理論，從而尋求商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡的權(quán)利范圍及合理性。其次，把商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則的地域范圍分為國(guó)內(nèi)用盡、區(qū)域用盡、國(guó)際用盡進(jìn)行討論。 商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則的限制。通過(guò)對(duì)美國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)國(guó)內(nèi)用盡、歐盟商標(biāo)權(quán)區(qū)域用盡、日本商標(biāo)權(quán)國(guó)際用盡的制度比較分析，并對(duì)相關(guān)案例精神進(jìn)行總結(jié)，重點(diǎn)闡述了反向假冒、平行進(jìn)口、損害商品聲譽(yù)等三種限制情形及判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則的實(shí)證分析。結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)手機(jī)翻新的判決以及國(guó)外立法和判例，，通過(guò)實(shí)證分析方法總結(jié)電子產(chǎn)品翻新援引商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則的條件及限制，說(shuō)明來(lái)源于合法市場(chǎng)、屬于維修而非再造范疇、不會(huì)讓買(mǎi)受人對(duì)商品的來(lái)源或品質(zhì)產(chǎn)生混淆的手機(jī)翻新行為應(yīng)當(dāng)可以援引商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則，消費(fèi)者在充分知情的前提下也應(yīng)當(dāng)有自行選擇的權(quán)利。 商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則制度建設(shè)的思考。首先對(duì)我國(guó)商標(biāo)立法的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行描述，我國(guó)現(xiàn)行商標(biāo)立法沒(méi)有明確規(guī)定商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡的相關(guān)內(nèi)容。其次，明確商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡的適用范圍。最后結(jié)合我國(guó)國(guó)情提出應(yīng)該將商標(biāo)權(quán)立法與環(huán)境資源立法相協(xié)調(diào)，通過(guò)建立商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡與生產(chǎn)者責(zé)任延伸制度，鼓勵(lì)合法翻新行業(yè)有序發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The legislation of trademark rights in our country is still blank in the aspect of the exhaustion of trademark rights. The emergence of electronic products, such as mobile phone refurbishment, poses a new challenge to the legal protection of trademark rights in China. At present, the second-hand market of mobile phone is deficient in both legal system and responsible subject, which is unfavorable to the protection of intellectual property and environmental resources. Whether the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights can be invoked in the renovation of electronic products is controversial in theory and practice. There is no final conclusion on how to implement the laws and regulations of electronic product refurbishment business. It is reasonable and necessary to introduce the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. This paper is divided into four parts: The scope of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. Through the discussion of the scope of rights of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, this paper expounds the relevant theories of exhaustion of trademark rights, so as to seek the scope and rationality of the exhaustion of trademark rights. Secondly, the territorial scope of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights is divided into domestic exhaustion, regional exhaustion and international exhaustion. Limitation of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. Through comparative analysis of the system of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights in the United States, regional exhaustion of trademark rights in the European Union, and international exhaustion of trademark rights in Japan, and a summary of the spirit of relevant cases, this paper focuses on reverse counterfeiting, parallel import. Damage to the reputation of goods and other three kinds of restrictions and judgment criteria. An empirical Analysis of the principle of exhaustion of Trademark Rights. Combined with the judgments of domestic mobile phone refurbishment and foreign legislation and jurisprudence, this paper summarizes the conditions and limitations of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights in the renovation of electronic products by means of empirical analysis. It shows that it comes from the legal market and belongs to the category of maintenance rather than reengineering. The principle of exhaustion of trademark rights should be invoked in the mobile phone refurbishment that does not confuse the buyer with the source or quality of the goods, and consumers should have the right to choose on the premise of being fully informed. Reflections on the system Construction of the principle of exhaustion of Trademark Rights. Firstly, the current situation of trademark legislation in China is described. Secondly, the scope of application of the exhaustion of trademark rights should be clarified. Finally, according to the situation of our country, we should coordinate the legislation of trademark right with the legislation of environmental resources, and encourage the orderly development of legal renovation industry by establishing the system of exhaustion of trademark rights and extension of producer responsibility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈娟;;侵權(quán)案件中如何適用“商標(biāo)權(quán)窮竭原則”[J];中華商標(biāo);2008年09期

2 黃細(xì)江;;翻新手機(jī)的商標(biāo)問(wèn)題[J];中華商標(biāo);2012年01期

3 馮曉青;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭問(wèn)題研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

4 高華;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易中的商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題法律研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年01期

5 黃暉;內(nèi)外有別——商標(biāo)權(quán)利用盡的判例與立法[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;1999年04期

6 鄒一凡;平行進(jìn)口與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利窮竭問(wèn)題思考[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

7 盧學(xué)麗;張今;;“改變商品外觀”的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)行為探析[J];中華商標(biāo);2013年04期

8 謝冠斌;陳增新;張昀;;中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議解決年度觀察(2013)[J];北京仲裁;2013年01期

9 王金勇;歐盟“商標(biāo)權(quán)窮竭”法律問(wèn)題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2001年06期

10 張永艾;權(quán)利窮竭原則探究——兼論平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題[J];河北法學(xué);2004年03期

本文編號(hào)：1950954