本文選題：商標權用盡 + 反向假冒��； 參考：《華南理工大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國商標權立法在商標權用盡的規(guī)定方面仍處于空白狀態(tài)。電子產(chǎn)品如手機翻新業(yè)務的產(chǎn)生，對我國商標權的法律保護領域提出了新的挑戰(zhàn)。手機二手市場目前無論是法律制度還是責任主體上均缺失，不利于知識產(chǎn)權及環(huán)境資源的保護。 電子產(chǎn)品翻新行為能否援引商標權用盡原則，在理論和實務中都存在諸多爭論。關于電子產(chǎn)品翻新業(yè)務方面的法律法規(guī)如何配套落實，目前尚無定論。引入商標權用盡原則有其合理性和必要性。本文共分四部分： 商標權用盡原則的范圍。通過對商標權用盡原則的權利范圍的探討，闡述商標權用盡的相關理論，從而尋求商標權用盡的權利范圍及合理性。其次，把商標權用盡原則的地域范圍分為國內(nèi)用盡、區(qū)域用盡、國際用盡進行討論。 商標權用盡原則的限制。通過對美國商標權國內(nèi)用盡、歐盟商標權區(qū)域用盡、日本商標權國際用盡的制度比較分析，并對相關案例精神進行總結，重點闡述了反向假冒、平行進口、損害商品聲譽等三種限制情形及判斷標準。 商標權用盡原則的實證分析。結合國內(nèi)手機翻新的判決以及國外立法和判例，，通過實證分析方法總結電子產(chǎn)品翻新援引商標權用盡原則的條件及限制，說明來源于合法市場、屬于維修而非再造范疇、不會讓買受人對商品的來源或品質產(chǎn)生混淆的手機翻新行為應當可以援引商標權用盡原則，消費者在充分知情的前提下也應當有自行選擇的權利。 商標權用盡原則制度建設的思考。首先對我國商標立法的現(xiàn)狀進行描述，我國現(xiàn)行商標立法沒有明確規(guī)定商標權用盡的相關內(nèi)容。其次，明確商標權用盡的適用范圍。最后結合我國國情提出應該將商標權立法與環(huán)境資源立法相協(xié)調(diào)，通過建立商標權用盡與生產(chǎn)者責任延伸制度，鼓勵合法翻新行業(yè)有序發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The legislation of trademark rights in our country is still blank in the aspect of the exhaustion of trademark rights. The emergence of electronic products, such as mobile phone refurbishment, poses a new challenge to the legal protection of trademark rights in China. At present, the second-hand market of mobile phone is deficient in both legal system and responsible subject, which is unfavorable to the protection of intellectual property and environmental resources. Whether the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights can be invoked in the renovation of electronic products is controversial in theory and practice. There is no final conclusion on how to implement the laws and regulations of electronic product refurbishment business. It is reasonable and necessary to introduce the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. This paper is divided into four parts: The scope of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. Through the discussion of the scope of rights of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, this paper expounds the relevant theories of exhaustion of trademark rights, so as to seek the scope and rationality of the exhaustion of trademark rights. Secondly, the territorial scope of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights is divided into domestic exhaustion, regional exhaustion and international exhaustion. Limitation of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights. Through comparative analysis of the system of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights in the United States, regional exhaustion of trademark rights in the European Union, and international exhaustion of trademark rights in Japan, and a summary of the spirit of relevant cases, this paper focuses on reverse counterfeiting, parallel import. Damage to the reputation of goods and other three kinds of restrictions and judgment criteria. An empirical Analysis of the principle of exhaustion of Trademark Rights. Combined with the judgments of domestic mobile phone refurbishment and foreign legislation and jurisprudence, this paper summarizes the conditions and limitations of the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights in the renovation of electronic products by means of empirical analysis. It shows that it comes from the legal market and belongs to the category of maintenance rather than reengineering. The principle of exhaustion of trademark rights should be invoked in the mobile phone refurbishment that does not confuse the buyer with the source or quality of the goods, and consumers should have the right to choose on the premise of being fully informed. Reflections on the system Construction of the principle of exhaustion of Trademark Rights. Firstly, the current situation of trademark legislation in China is described. Secondly, the scope of application of the exhaustion of trademark rights should be clarified. Finally, according to the situation of our country, we should coordinate the legislation of trademark right with the legislation of environmental resources, and encourage the orderly development of legal renovation industry by establishing the system of exhaustion of trademark rights and extension of producer responsibility.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 賈娟;;侵權案件中如何適用“商標權窮竭原則”[J];中華商標;2008年09期

2 黃細江;;翻新手機的商標問題[J];中華商標;2012年01期

3 馮曉青;;知識產(chǎn)權的權利窮竭問題研究[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2007年03期

4 高華;;國際貿(mào)易中的商標產(chǎn)品平行進口問題法律研究[J];法學雜志;2007年01期

5 黃暉;內(nèi)外有別——商標權利用盡的判例與立法[J];國際貿(mào)易;1999年04期

6 鄒一凡;平行進口與知識產(chǎn)權權利窮竭問題思考[J];貴州大學學報(社會科學版);2004年01期

7 盧學麗;張今;;“改變商品外觀”的商標侵權行為探析[J];中華商標;2013年04期

8 謝冠斌;陳增新;張昀;;中國知識產(chǎn)權爭議解決年度觀察(2013)[J];北京仲裁;2013年01期

9 王金勇;歐盟“商標權窮竭”法律問題研究[J];河北法學;2001年06期

10 張永艾;權利窮竭原則探究——兼論平行進口問題[J];河北法學;2004年03期

本文編號：1950954