本文選題：專利權(quán) + 權(quán)利濫用　； 參考：《上海交通大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：沒有哪一部國際協(xié)議能比TRIPS更體現(xiàn)發(fā)達(dá)國家與發(fā)展中國家在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際貿(mào)易上的對立了。然而，發(fā)展中國家應(yīng)該如何在符合TRIPS協(xié)議的前提下制定符合自己利益的法律，是一個較為復(fù)雜的問題。因此，本文擬在回顧TRIPS簽訂的歷程、考察各個國家在本國濫用專利權(quán)問題上的相關(guān)做法，以期能清晰濫用專利權(quán)概念的內(nèi)涵、外延和其對國家利益的影響，，為我國的相關(guān)立法提供前瞻性的預(yù)測。 與國內(nèi)現(xiàn)有的其他研究相比,本文不拘泥于從國內(nèi)立法角度來分析問題，同時從TRIPS協(xié)議產(chǎn)生時的歷史背景來闡述協(xié)議背后的發(fā)達(dá)國家和發(fā)展中國家的博弈關(guān)系。另一方面，在借鑒美國、歐洲、日本、德國、英國、中國臺灣的相關(guān)立法實踐的基礎(chǔ)上，對中國相關(guān)法規(guī)的立法前景做出展望。全文分為引言、正文、結(jié)論三大部分,其中正文由四章構(gòu)成: 第一章主要介紹了濫用專利權(quán)的基本定義，并進(jìn)一步從主觀要件、主體要件、客觀要件和客體要件的角度闡述了濫用專利權(quán)的各個要素。第二章主要介紹了美國、歐盟、日本、德國以及我國臺灣地區(qū)對濫用專利權(quán)的相關(guān)法律規(guī)制，對各個國家的做法進(jìn)行了初步比較。第三章從TRIPS的產(chǎn)生背景出發(fā)，詳細(xì)敘述了發(fā)達(dá)國家和發(fā)展中國家在簽署TRIPS時的關(guān)系，進(jìn)而對TRIPS第40條展開敘述。第四章首先介紹了我國立法機(jī)關(guān)在濫用專利權(quán)上的立法現(xiàn)狀，根據(jù)中國在簽訂TRIPS時的歷史背景和當(dāng)前在世界上的地位，對這些年的法規(guī)稍加分析，然后根據(jù)中國的當(dāng)前科技研發(fā)能力給出濫用專利權(quán)的規(guī)制建議，并對中國日后的立法趨勢加以展望。 TRIPS協(xié)議中關(guān)于利用專利權(quán)扭曲貿(mào)易程序的規(guī)定已經(jīng)為各個成員規(guī)制專利濫用設(shè)定了大致的制度框架。相應(yīng)地，我國應(yīng)該在TRIPS協(xié)議的框架下進(jìn)一步完善專利權(quán)濫用的法規(guī)，以優(yōu)化我國壟斷法和反不正當(dāng)競爭法在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題上的制度。在反壟斷法對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制上，一定要根據(jù)中國的自身工業(yè)研發(fā)體系的現(xiàn)狀來決定是否應(yīng)該借鑒發(fā)達(dá)國家和地區(qū)的立法，從而進(jìn)一步?jīng)Q定專利權(quán)濫用與反壟斷法的關(guān)系，到底濫用專利權(quán)是相關(guān)權(quán)利主體違反反壟斷法的前提還是結(jié)果，才能避免日后以反壟斷法規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用走入誤區(qū)。
[Abstract]:There is no international agreement more than the TRIPS that represents the antithesis between developed and developing countries in international trade in intellectual property rights. However, how developing countries should make laws in accordance with the TRIPS agreement is a more complicated issue. Therefore, this paper intends to review the process of signing TRIPS, examine the relevant practices of each country on the issue of patent abuse in their own countries, in order to clearly understand the connotation, extension and impact on the national interests of the concept of patent abuse. To provide foresight forecast for the relevant legislation of our country. Compared with other domestic studies, this paper does not focus on the analysis of the problem from the perspective of domestic legislation, and expounds the game relationship between developed and developing countries behind the TRIPS protocol from the historical background when it came into being. On the other hand, based on the relevant legislative practice of the United States, Europe, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom and Taiwan, the prospect of the relevant laws and regulations in China is prospected. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is composed of four chapters: The first chapter mainly introduces the basic definition of patent abuse, and further expounds the elements of patent abuse from the perspective of subjective elements, subjective elements, objective elements and object elements. The second chapter mainly introduces the relevant laws and regulations on patent abuse in the United States, the European Union, Japan, Germany and Taiwan, and makes a preliminary comparison of the practices of each country. From the background of TRIPS, the third chapter describes the relationship between developed and developing countries when signing TRIPS, and then describes Article 40 of TRIPS. The fourth chapter first introduces the legislative status of the abuse of patent rights in China's legislature. According to the historical background of China's signing of TRIPS and its current status in the world, it makes a little analysis of the laws and regulations of these years. Then according to China's current scientific and technological R & D capabilities, the author gives some suggestions on the regulation of patent abuse, and looks forward to the future trend of China's legislation. The provisions of the TRIPS Agreement on the use of patent rights to distort trade procedures have set a general institutional framework for each member to regulate patent abuse. Accordingly, under the framework of TRIPS agreement, China should further perfect the regulations on patent abuse, so as to optimize the system of China's monopoly law and anti-unfair competition law on the issue of intellectual property rights. In the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights in the anti-monopoly law, we must decide whether we should learn from the legislation of developed countries and regions according to the current situation of China's own industrial research and development system, so as to further determine the relationship between patent abuse and anti-monopoly law. After all, the abuse of patent right is the premise or result of the violation of antimonopoly law by the relevant subject of rights, so as to avoid the misunderstanding of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights by anti-monopoly law in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王先林;若干國家和地區(qū)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷控制[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張健;專利權(quán)濫用及其法律規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

本文編號：1791208