商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營限制競爭行為法律問題研究
本文選題:商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營 + 限制競爭行為 ; 參考:《北方工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文
【摘要】:商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營是一種極具魅力的經(jīng)營模式?煽诳蓸贰⒌纤鼓、肯德基、麥當(dāng)勞等眾多大家耳熟能詳?shù)膫髌娑际怯缮虡I(yè)特許經(jīng)營模式打造出來的。許多企業(yè)都通過特許經(jīng)營的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)了企業(yè)規(guī)模的驚人擴(kuò)張。在現(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域中,它體現(xiàn)出了極強(qiáng)的生命力。我國商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營起步時(shí)間不長,在其蓬勃發(fā)展的同時(shí)不可避免的引發(fā)了一系列相關(guān)的法律問題。在商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中,特許人為了保護(hù)自己的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)或者為了維持商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營體系對外的同一性,一般都會對受許人的經(jīng)營活動進(jìn)行種種限制。這種限制有其存在的合理性。但是在現(xiàn)實(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)生活中,特許人為了獲得非法利益,往往濫用自己的權(quán)利對受許人采取一些不必要的限制,使受許人喪失了自主選擇權(quán)。如何對待商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中的這些限制性競爭行為是我們必須要解決的問題。當(dāng)前,我國對商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中的限制競爭行為還處于學(xué)術(shù)研究階段,相關(guān)法律沒有對其進(jìn)行專門規(guī)制。本文擬通過對商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中的典型限制競爭行為進(jìn)行分析,比較研究美國、歐盟國家的相關(guān)立法,提出完善我國商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中限制競爭行為法律規(guī)制的相關(guān)建議。 本文分四部分進(jìn)行論述:第一部分是對商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營限制競爭行為的概述。首先從商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營基礎(chǔ)理論入手,分析了商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營的法律關(guān)系及該經(jīng)營模式的利弊。并在此基礎(chǔ)上論述了商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中限制競爭行為存在的合理性以及法律規(guī)制的必要性。第二部分具體分析了商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中的幾種典型的限制競爭行為,包括搭售行為、限制轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格、地域限制、回授條款以及競業(yè)禁止行為。第三部分在比較美國及歐盟國家相關(guān)立法的基礎(chǔ)上得出我國對該行為立法規(guī)制的啟示。第四部分是對我國商業(yè)特許經(jīng)營中限制競爭行為立法現(xiàn)狀的評析及對我國完善相關(guān)立法的建議。
[Abstract]:Commercial franchise is a very attractive business model.Coca-Cola, Disney, KFC, McDonald's and many other familiar legends are created by the business franchise model.Many enterprises have realized the astonishing expansion of the enterprise scale through the way of franchise.In the field of modern market economy, it embodies a strong vitality.Commercial franchising in our country has not started for a long time, which inevitably leads to a series of related legal problems while its vigorous development.In order to protect their intellectual property rights or maintain the external identity of the commercial franchise system, franchisees generally restrict the franchisee's business activities.This limitation has its existence rationality.But in real economic life, franchisor, in order to obtain illegal benefits, often abuse his right to take some unnecessary restrictions on the franchisee, which makes the franchisee lose his right of choice.How to deal with these restrictive competitive behaviors is a problem that we must solve.At present, the restrictive competition behavior in commercial franchising is still in the stage of academic research, and the relevant laws do not specifically regulate it.Through the analysis of the typical restrictive competition behavior in the commercial franchise, this paper compares the relevant legislation of the United States and the European Union, and puts forward the relevant suggestions to perfect the legal regulation of the restricted competition behavior in the commercial franchise of our country.This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of commercial franchising to restrict competition.Starting with the basic theory of commercial franchise, this paper analyzes the legal relationship of commercial franchise and its advantages and disadvantages.On this basis, it discusses the rationality of restricting competition and the necessity of legal regulation.The second part analyzes several typical restricted competition behaviors in commercial franchise, including tying behavior, resale price restriction, geographical restriction, back awarding clause and non-competition behavior.In the third part, on the basis of comparing the relevant legislation of the United States and the European Union, the author draws the enlightenment of our country on the regulation of the behavior legislation.The fourth part is the analysis of the current situation of the legislation of restricting competition behavior in China's commercial franchising and the suggestions of perfecting the relevant legislation in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:D922.294
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 范在峰;特許經(jīng)營限制競爭行為法律研究[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年06期
2 徐軼;;歐美反壟斷法對固定轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格的規(guī)定[J];中國科技投資;2006年12期
3 應(yīng)啟明;試論特許經(jīng)營的法律問題[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年02期
4 王煥菊;;對反壟斷法下的縱向壟斷協(xié)議的研究[J];法制與社會;2008年26期
5 金瑞琴;;論我國的反壟斷法豁免制度[J];管理觀察;2008年17期
6 張杰斌;論特許經(jīng)營主體之反壟斷法定位——兼論反壟斷法與商事法之主體觀差異[J];湖北省社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期
7 張靖;;論對縱向壟斷協(xié)議的規(guī)制[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期
8 饒粵紅;;特許經(jīng)營競業(yè)禁止的反壟斷法分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2008年05期
9 盛立強(qiáng);;委托代理視角下的特許經(jīng)營風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及防范[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2006年25期
10 陳乃新;經(jīng)濟(jì)法是中國現(xiàn)代化的主要法律保障[J];中外法學(xué);1998年03期
,本文編號:1734216
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1734216.html