本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：傳統(tǒng)文化　出處：《哈爾濱工程大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)文化的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)之所以屢遭否定,與公眾包括學(xué)界對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)視閾下傳統(tǒng)文化的范圍認(rèn)定不清有直接關(guān)系。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)傳統(tǒng)文化可以分為有形傳統(tǒng)文化與無形傳統(tǒng)文化;以是否可以某一介質(zhì)作為載體為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),無形傳統(tǒng)文化又可以分為思想型傳統(tǒng)文化與技藝型傳統(tǒng)文化、符標(biāo)型傳統(tǒng)文化三大類。根據(jù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)品之無形性等特點(diǎn),技藝型傳統(tǒng)文化、符標(biāo)型傳統(tǒng)文化符合“無形有體”的特征,可見知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)視閾下的傳統(tǒng)文化應(yīng)與“技藝型傳統(tǒng)文化+符標(biāo)型傳統(tǒng)文化”的總和相一致。對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外立法概況的梳理和總結(jié)為恰當(dāng)認(rèn)定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)視閾下傳統(tǒng)文化的保護(hù)范圍奠定了堅(jiān)實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)。與全民型權(quán)利主體相比,社群型權(quán)利主體的認(rèn)定較為復(fù)雜。既有不同社群之間的歸屬爭(zhēng)議,又涉及同一社群少數(shù)成員遷徙后主體地位的分析。筆者認(rèn)為以作品為基礎(chǔ)時(shí),遷徙成員主體地位可以保留,而在坐標(biāo)本位模式下,遷徙成員會(huì)喪失主體地位。關(guān)于傳統(tǒng)文化的權(quán)利客體,除基本分類外,也可以分為原生型傳統(tǒng)文化與演繹型傳統(tǒng)文化,而演繹型傳統(tǒng)文化嚴(yán)格意義上不屬于傳統(tǒng)文化。傳統(tǒng)文化權(quán)利內(nèi)容包括精神權(quán)利和財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利,著重強(qiáng)調(diào)真實(shí)性、保密性及非冒犯性對(duì)權(quán)利內(nèi)容實(shí)現(xiàn)的重要作用�？梢�,對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù),應(yīng)從立法的層面,設(shè)置賠償權(quán)、知情同意權(quán)及惠益分享權(quán)。對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化保護(hù)應(yīng)當(dāng)走出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法“公有領(lǐng)域”的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū),承認(rèn)公有領(lǐng)域的文化應(yīng)用將實(shí)現(xiàn)從“免費(fèi)文化”到“公平文化”的逐步過渡。
[Abstract]:The reason why the protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture is repeatedly denied is directly related to the ambiguity of the scope of traditional culture from the perspective of intellectual property rights in the public, including the academic circles. The study found that the traditional culture can be divided into tangible traditional culture and intangible traditional culture. According to the criterion of whether a medium can be used as a carrier, intangible traditional culture can be divided into three categories: ideological traditional culture, artisanal traditional culture, standard traditional culture, etc. According to the characteristics of the knowledge product, the artisanal traditional culture can be divided into three categories: ideological traditional culture, artisanal traditional culture, etc. The traditional culture accords with the characteristics of "invisible substance". It can be seen that the traditional culture from the perspective of intellectual property rights should be consistent with the sum of "the traditional culture of skill type traditional culture of conformity type". Combing and summing up the general situation of legislation at home and abroad, it is appropriate to identify the traditional culture under the scope of intellectual property right. The scope of protection has laid a solid foundation. The identification of the subject of social rights is more complicated. There are not only disputes among different communities, but also the analysis of the status of the subject after the migration of minority members of the same community. The author thinks that the subject status of the migrant member can be preserved on the basis of the works. On the other hand, in the coordinate standard mode, migrant members will lose their subject status. Besides basic classification, the right object of traditional culture can also be divided into primary traditional culture and deductive traditional culture. But the deductive traditional culture does not belong to the traditional culture in the strict sense. The content of the traditional cultural rights includes spiritual rights and property rights, emphasizing the important role of authenticity, confidentiality and non-offensive to the realization of the content of the rights. For the protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture, we should set up the right of compensation, informed consent and benefit-sharing from the level of legislation. We should get rid of the misunderstanding of the "public domain" of the law of intellectual property rights for the protection of traditional culture. The recognition of cultural applications in the public domain will lead to a gradual transition from a "free culture" to a "fair culture".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張冬;;傳統(tǒng)文化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專有性認(rèn)定的幾個(gè)基本問題[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年03期

2 嚴(yán)永和;;當(dāng)下國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度調(diào)適的主要思路[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年04期

3 張冬;李博;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)私權(quán)社會(huì)化的立法價(jià)值取向[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年03期

4 程松亮;;版權(quán)保護(hù)期發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及對(duì)策研究[J];科技與法律;2011年06期

5 李琛;;論“folklore”與“民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)”的非等同性[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年04期

6 郭禾;;對(duì)非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)私權(quán)保護(hù)模式的質(zhì)疑[J];中國(guó)人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

7 向波;;知識(shí)、信息與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的對(duì)象[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年01期

8 馮曉青;;非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年03期

9 吳漢東;;論傳統(tǒng)文化的法律保護(hù)——以非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)和傳統(tǒng)文化表現(xiàn)形式為對(duì)象[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年01期

10 李楊;;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)保護(hù)的“公共領(lǐng)域”困境解讀[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 吳漢東;;傳統(tǒng)文化保護(hù)制度的法理學(xué)分析[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1677384