發(fā)布時間：2018-03-10 16:23

  本文選題：開放平臺　切入點(diǎn)：個人數(shù)據(jù)　出處：《北京郵電大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：開放平臺憑借其出色的資源整合優(yōu)勢已成為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)爭相采用的商業(yè)模式,因其能增強(qiáng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)的創(chuàng)新性,釋放平臺創(chuàng)造力,扶植以開放應(yīng)用小軟件為生的中小企業(yè),故其也必然成為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展趨勢。然而,由于這一商業(yè)模式涉及主體多樣,運(yùn)作流程復(fù)雜,配套法律制度不成熟不齊備,且國內(nèi)至今并未出臺系統(tǒng)的個人數(shù)據(jù)相關(guān)的法律法規(guī),使得互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)在經(jīng)營其開放平臺的過程中存在諸多隱憂及法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 本文認(rèn)為個人數(shù)據(jù)是指以任何形式存在的可以直接或間接識別出自然人身份的一個或多個信息的組合。其分為與人格利益相關(guān)的個人數(shù)據(jù)和與人格利益無關(guān)的個人數(shù)據(jù)。其中,個人數(shù)據(jù)所含有的商業(yè)價(jià)值具有稀缺性、有用性和可控制性,可以作為財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的客體。因而,個人數(shù)據(jù)商業(yè)化利用具有合理性和必要性。 而當(dāng)前并未出臺有關(guān)個人信息保護(hù)的系統(tǒng)性法律,法學(xué)理論又固守隱私權(quán)保護(hù)理論,導(dǎo)致個人數(shù)據(jù)商業(yè)化利用在理論上缺乏正當(dāng)性與合理性。針對此種情況,首先應(yīng)該轉(zhuǎn)變傳統(tǒng)法學(xué)中個人數(shù)據(jù)人格權(quán)說的觀念,明確個人數(shù)據(jù)分為與人格利益有關(guān)的個人數(shù)據(jù)和與人格利益無關(guān)的個人數(shù)據(jù),并承認(rèn)個人數(shù)據(jù)具有獨(dú)立的商業(yè)價(jià)值。對于目前正在制定中的《民法典》總則及各編中進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的調(diào)整：在人格權(quán)編中,僅將與人格利益有關(guān)的個人數(shù)據(jù)納入其中進(jìn)行保護(hù)。而將與人格利益無關(guān)的個人數(shù)據(jù)的商業(yè)價(jià)值納入到財(cái)產(chǎn)編進(jìn)行保護(hù)。財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)一編中,除債權(quán)外的廣義物權(quán)法中可區(qū)分為傳統(tǒng)的物權(quán)法和信息財(cái)產(chǎn)法。信息財(cái)產(chǎn)法保護(hù)的客體即是個人數(shù)據(jù)的財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)值,故而又可分為具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的信息財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)----即知識產(chǎn)權(quán)和非獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的信息財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)。其中,在物權(quán)法一章中,應(yīng)承認(rèn)信息存儲空間的獨(dú)立法律地位。侵權(quán)法一編中,應(yīng)貫穿個人數(shù)據(jù)商業(yè)價(jià)值財(cái)產(chǎn)性這一觀念。確立個人數(shù)據(jù)商業(yè)價(jià)值以及信息存儲空間可作為侵權(quán)法保護(hù)的利益之一。并對人格利益與財(cái)產(chǎn)利益予以平等保護(hù)。在個人數(shù)據(jù)的專門立法中應(yīng)確立個人數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)的基本原則。此外,由于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展的迅速性與立法滯后性之間的矛盾,應(yīng)充分重視互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)自律在規(guī)制個人數(shù)據(jù)的商業(yè)利用與保護(hù)中的作用。在開放平臺的具體商業(yè)實(shí)踐中,應(yīng)加強(qiáng)行業(yè)自律組織的作用,統(tǒng)一平臺的隱私政策,規(guī)范《用戶軟件許可使用協(xié)議》與《開放平臺者協(xié)議》,按照《合同法》基本原理和個人數(shù)據(jù)利用的基本原則作出相應(yīng)調(diào)整。
[Abstract]:Open platform, with its outstanding resource integration advantage, has become a competitive business model for Internet companies, because it can enhance the innovation of Internet enterprises, release platform creativity, and foster small and medium-sized enterprises that live on open application of small software. Therefore, it will inevitably become the trend of the development of the Internet industry. However, due to the diversity of the main body involved in this business model, the operation process is complex, and the supporting legal system is not mature and complete. And there is no systematic personal data related laws and regulations in China, which makes Internet enterprises have many hidden worries and legal risks in the process of operating their open platform. In this paper, personal data is defined as a combination of one or more information that can directly or indirectly identify the identity of a natural person in any form. It is divided into personal data related to personal interests and independent of personality interests. Personal data. Of which, The commercial value contained in personal data is rare, useful and controllable, and can be regarded as the object of property right. Therefore, the commercial use of personal data is reasonable and necessary. However, there is no systematic law on the protection of personal information at present, and the legal theory adheres to the theory of privacy protection, which leads to the lack of legitimacy and rationality of the commercial use of personal data in theory. First of all, we should change the concept of personal data personality right in traditional jurisprudence, and make it clear that personal data can be divided into personal data related to personality interests and personal data independent of personality interests. And recognizing the independent commercial value of personal data. The general provisions of the Civil Code, which are currently under development, and the respective sections are adjusted accordingly: in the personal Rights Code, Only personal data related to personal interests are protected... and the commercial value of personal data not related to personal interests is included in the property series for protection... property rights, In addition to creditor's rights, the generalized property law can be divided into traditional property law and information property law. The object protected by information property law is the property value of personal data. Therefore, it can be divided into original information property rights, that is, intellectual property rights and non-original information property rights, in which, in the chapter of property law, the independent legal status of information storage space should be recognized. The commercial value of personal data and the property property should be permeated. The commercial value of personal data and the storage space of information can be regarded as one of the interests protected by tort law, and the interests of personality and property should be protected equally. The basic principles of personal data protection should be established in specific legislation on personal data... in addition, Due to the contradiction between the rapid development of the Internet and the lag in legislation, we should pay full attention to the role of self-discipline in regulating the commercial use and protection of personal data. It is necessary to strengthen the role of industry self-discipline organizations, unify the privacy policy of the platform, standardize the user Software license Agreement and the Open platform Agreement, and make corresponding adjustments in accordance with the basic principles of contract Law and the basic principles of personal data utilization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 齊愛民;;信息社會中個人信息的濫用與人格權(quán)侵害[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

2 張?zhí)鹛?;檔案開放利用中個人信息保護(hù)之管見[J];檔案管理;2007年03期

3 馬琳;宋俊德;宋美娜;;開放平臺:運(yùn)營模式與技術(shù)架構(gòu)研究綜述[J];電信科學(xué);2012年06期

4 張欽坤;;云計(jì)算、開放平臺與服務(wù)商版權(quán)責(zé)任[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年12期

5 張金城;廖永威;;香港個人資料隱私保護(hù)之經(jīng)驗(yàn)——兼論我國個人資料保護(hù)法之制定[J];河北法學(xué);2008年11期

6 湯擎;試論個人數(shù)據(jù)與相關(guān)的法律關(guān)系[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年05期

7 譚晨輝;劉青炎;;OpenAPI出現(xiàn)、起源與現(xiàn)狀[J];程序員;2008年07期

8 宋譽(yù);;基于騰訊開放平臺的第三方應(yīng)用研究[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2012年05期

9 詹新惠;;開放平臺的喜與憂[J];青年記者;2011年04期

10 劉德良;;確認(rèn)個人信息的財(cái)產(chǎn)屬性 抑制垃圾信息泛濫[J];世界電信;2010年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 向欣;網(wǎng)絡(luò)中個人數(shù)據(jù)隱私權(quán)的民法保護(hù)[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2005年

2 鄭素梅;論我國個人信息的法律保護(hù)[D];暨南大學(xué);2006年

3 蘇長江;個人信息商業(yè)化利用的民法保護(hù)[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1594125