本文選題：外觀設(shè)計　切入點(diǎn)：專利權(quán)　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：權(quán)利沖突是一個較普遍的法律現(xiàn)象，在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域，由于其客體的特殊性，更易產(chǎn)生權(quán)利沖突。隨著我國司法實(shí)踐的日益深化，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的權(quán)利沖突問題引起了學(xué)者的廣泛關(guān)注與積極探討。 我國專利法對其保護(hù)的外觀設(shè)計客體有美感要求，這就使其有了一定的獨(dú)創(chuàng)性并傾注了創(chuàng)作者的思想，因而其中的一部分可能與著作權(quán)保護(hù)的客體作品重合或交叉；外觀設(shè)計以形狀、圖案和色彩或其結(jié)合為設(shè)計要素，具有識別性的那一部分可能與商標(biāo)法保護(hù)的客體商標(biāo)重合或交叉；很多外觀設(shè)計是以外包裝等形式出現(xiàn)的平面設(shè)計，可能與知名商品特有包裝、裝潢重合或交叉。如果一個外觀設(shè)計有一定的獨(dú)創(chuàng)性，有顯著的識別性，而且在長期的使用中形成自己獨(dú)特的裝潢，那么就有可能同時成為專利法、著作權(quán)法、商標(biāo)法和反不正當(dāng)競爭法保護(hù)的客體。而當(dāng)這些客體屬于不同的主體時，不免容易發(fā)生沖突，并在目前難以解決，因?yàn)槊總�主體在行使其權(quán)利時，都有其法律依據(jù)，這在一定程度上鼓勵和縱容了侵權(quán)行為，，損害了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利人的利益，更重要的是不利于我國的外觀設(shè)計水平的發(fā)展，因此外觀設(shè)計權(quán)利沖突問題須引起高度重視。 本文第一章首先是介紹了外觀設(shè)計權(quán)利沖突的研究背景及意義，對國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行綜述，提出現(xiàn)有研究的不足，并簡要說明本文的研究內(nèi)容和研究方法。第二章是對外觀設(shè)計權(quán)利沖突基本理論問題的解析，明確權(quán)利沖突的存在并值得研究，限定外觀設(shè)計的范圍，從而對外觀設(shè)計權(quán)利沖突作出界定，構(gòu)成本文的理論基礎(chǔ)和分析依據(jù)。第三章是通過外觀設(shè)計權(quán)利與著作權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)以及知名商品特有包裝裝潢使用權(quán)相沖突這三類典型沖突的案例分析沖突的表現(xiàn)形式，進(jìn)而分析其產(chǎn)生沖突的原因。第四章對我國現(xiàn)有解決外觀設(shè)計權(quán)利沖突的模式進(jìn)行研究，并提出存在的問題。最后一章分析國外解決外觀設(shè)計權(quán)利沖突的經(jīng)驗(yàn)對我國的啟示，提出完善我國外觀設(shè)計保護(hù)的思路及建議，以協(xié)調(diào)外觀設(shè)計專利與在先權(quán)利沖突為基礎(chǔ)，轉(zhuǎn)變外觀設(shè)計立法模式，完善外觀設(shè)計專利授權(quán)審查制度，并建設(shè)合理的配套措施。
[Abstract]:Conflict of rights is a common legal phenomenon. In the field of intellectual property rights, it is more likely to produce conflict of rights because of the particularity of its object. The conflict of rights in the field of intellectual property has attracted extensive attention and active discussion. The patent law of our country has the esthetic request to the object of appearance design that it protects, this makes it have certain originality and pour into the thought of the creator, so some of them may overlap or cross with the object of copyright protection; The design takes shape, design and color, or a combination thereof as design elements, and the part that is recognizable may overlap or intersect with the object trademark protected by trademark law; many designs are graphic designs in the form of outer packaging, etc. If a design has a certain originality, significant recognition, and forms its own unique decoration in long-term use, then it may become a patent law at the same time. Copyright Law, Trademark Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law protect objects. When these objects belong to different subjects, they are prone to conflict and are difficult to resolve at present, because each subject has its own legal basis in exercising its rights. This encourages and connives the infringement to a certain extent, damages the interests of the intellectual property right holders, and more importantly, is not conducive to the development of the design level in our country. Therefore, the conflict of the design rights should be paid great attention to. The first chapter of this paper introduces the background and significance of the research on the conflict of design rights, summarizes the current research situation at home and abroad, and points out the shortcomings of the existing research. The second chapter is the analysis of the basic theory of the conflict of the right to design, the existence of the conflict of rights and worthy of study, and limit the scope of the design. Thus, the conflict of design rights is defined, which constitutes the theoretical basis and analytical basis of this paper. Chapter three is based on the design rights and copyright. Trademark rights and the conflicts of the right to use the special packaging and decoration of well-known commodities the case study on the conflict forms of the three kinds of typical conflicts, Then it analyzes the causes of the conflict. Chapter 4th studies the existing mode of resolving the conflict of design rights in China, and puts forward the existing problems. The last chapter analyzes the enlightenment of the experience of foreign countries in resolving the conflict of the right to design in China. This paper puts forward some ideas and suggestions for perfecting the protection of design in our country, on the basis of coordinating the conflict between the patent of design and the conflict of prior rights, changing the legislative mode of design, perfecting the examination system of patent authorization of design, and constructing reasonable supporting measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 DavidMusker,劉新宇,龍文;歐盟外觀設(shè)計專利制度介紹[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年04期

2 周根才;高毅龍;;外觀設(shè)計專利侵權(quán)判定若干問題[J];法律適用;2007年05期

3 胡充寒;;外觀設(shè)計專利侵權(quán)判定混淆標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法律適用;2010年06期

4 李閣霞;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突探析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

5 吳漢東;關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)本體、主體與客體的重新認(rèn)識——以財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)為比較研究對象[J];法學(xué)評論;2000年05期

6 郝鐵川;權(quán)利沖突:一個不成為問題的問題[J];法學(xué);2004年09期

7 張淑華;;試析外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)與著作權(quán)的沖突及其解決[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報);2009年03期

8 蘇平;;部分外觀設(shè)計專利問題探析與思考[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2012年10期

9 胡余旺;;權(quán)利沖突的法哲學(xué)思考[J];河北法學(xué);2010年08期

10 劉秀臣;外觀設(shè)計知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的立法模式[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2001年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 本報記者 魏小毛;[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)報;2006年

本文編號：1574870