本文選題：專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)利窮竭原則　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：人類的一切活動(dòng)都是圍繞經(jīng)濟(jì)為基礎(chǔ)的,人類的活動(dòng)基本上都是為了獲得經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,由于不同的地方有不同的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平和購買力,不同國家、不同地區(qū)的勞動(dòng)力、原材料價(jià)格有所不同,而專利權(quán)人往往會(huì)把這些費(fèi)用轉(zhuǎn)嫁于消費(fèi)者,從而導(dǎo)致同一產(chǎn)品不同地區(qū)的價(jià)格差,正是這價(jià)格差促使專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口的產(chǎn)生。由于灰色交易商的成本費(fèi)用較低和全球自由貿(mào)易自由化的加劇,使專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口越發(fā)普遍。 隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展世界一體化進(jìn)程的加速,產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口中越來越多地涉及到知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)問題,專利權(quán)的基本屬性與國際貿(mào)易的目的卻相互沖突,所以關(guān)于專利產(chǎn)品的平行進(jìn)口是否合法引起了很大爭議。有關(guān)專利權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭問題,世界各國的立法和司法實(shí)踐差異很大,理論界也就此爭議多年。而TRIPS協(xié)議第6條將專利權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭問題交由各國根據(jù)各自國內(nèi)法處理,使得各國在關(guān)于平行進(jìn)口的司法實(shí)踐各有特點(diǎn),無法統(tǒng)一。 我國新專利法允許專利產(chǎn)品的平行進(jìn)口后,利弊并存,我們應(yīng)分析其利弊并在參考國外先進(jìn)立法的基礎(chǔ)上對各方利益的保護(hù)與調(diào)和提出可操作性建議來揚(yáng)長避短。本文分為四個(gè)部分： 首先,介紹專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口的概念,特征,以及表現(xiàn)形式,產(chǎn)生原因； 其次,提出專利平行進(jìn)口的依據(jù)及其沖突； 再次,對國外發(fā)達(dá)國家對專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口的規(guī)定與司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行考察； 最后對我國專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行闡釋并針對多方利益的保護(hù)提出相應(yīng)對策。通篇采用規(guī)范分析法,比較分析法,案例分析法等研究方法對專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口的法律問題進(jìn)行研究,從多方面綜合考慮提出相應(yīng)的應(yīng)對措施,從而使社會(huì)各方利益達(dá)到調(diào)和。
[Abstract]:All human activities are based on the economy. Human activities are basically for the benefit of the economy, because different places have different levels of economic development and purchasing power, different countries and different regions of the labor force, Raw material prices vary, and patentees tend to pass on these costs to consumers, leading to poor prices in different regions of the same product. Because of the low cost of grey dealers and the increase of free trade liberalization, parallel import of patent products becomes more and more common. With the acceleration of the world integration process of economic development, the protection of intellectual property rights is more and more involved in the parallel import of products, but the basic attributes of patent right and the purpose of international trade conflict with each other. Therefore, whether the parallel import of patented products is legal has aroused great controversy. With regard to the exhaustion of patent rights, the legislation and judicial practice of countries in the world vary greatly. Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement refers the exhaustion of patent rights to each country according to their respective domestic laws, which makes each country have its own characteristics in the judicial practice of parallel import, which can not be unified. After China's new patent law allows parallel imports of patented products, there are both advantages and disadvantages. We should analyze its advantages and disadvantages and put forward operational suggestions on the protection and reconciliation of the interests of all parties on the basis of reference to foreign advanced legislation. This paper is divided into four parts:. First of all, it introduces the concept, characteristics, forms and causes of parallel import of patent products. Secondly, it puts forward the basis and conflict of patent parallel import. Thirdly, the regulation and judicial practice of parallel import of patent products in developed countries are investigated. Finally, it explains the current situation of parallel import of patent products in China and puts forward corresponding countermeasures for the protection of various interests. Case analysis and other research methods study the legal problems of parallel import of patent products and put forward corresponding countermeasures from various aspects so as to reconcile the interests of all parties in the society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 梁銀湘;王伍萍;韓潔波;;金融危機(jī)背景下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)平行進(jìn)口探析[J];創(chuàng)新;2010年03期

2 張悅;;論專利權(quán)窮竭原則[J];東華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

3 欒春娟;王賀國;;論專利權(quán)窮竭[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

4 尹鋒林;;美國專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口規(guī)則及對我國的借鑒意義[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

5 劉文靜;;論專利實(shí)施許可中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年02期

6 閆可榮;;關(guān)于技術(shù)引進(jìn)企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)屬風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年26期

7 范麗娜;唐寶麗;;國際貿(mào)易中的平行進(jìn)口與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];河北青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

8 賈翔宇;;論專利產(chǎn)品的平行進(jìn)口[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2012年23期

9 劉亞軍;馬樂;;我國專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口制度新發(fā)展之理論探究——以《專利法》的修改為考察對象[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2012年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1569536