本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省　出處：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省建設(shè)是順應(yīng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)需要,隨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)實(shí)力日益成為國際競爭的主要方面,加緊建設(shè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國和強(qiáng)省也就很有必要。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在我國以往社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中是被忽視的,尤其社會(huì)大眾和企業(yè)群體沒有樹立正確的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)意識(shí),不懂得尊重智力勞動(dòng)成果,進(jìn)而阻礙了全社會(huì)的科技進(jìn)步和創(chuàng)新。因此,展開知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省建設(shè)績效評價(jià)研究有十分重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本研究首先對論文研究背景和國內(nèi)外相關(guān)的研究成果進(jìn)行梳理,為后續(xù)研究奠定理論和學(xué)術(shù)背景。以江蘇省為研究對象,在正式開展研究之前,對江蘇目前知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省建設(shè)情況進(jìn)行了基本分析。依據(jù)政府發(fā)布的工作報(bào)告和前期學(xué)術(shù)研究,理清江蘇在構(gòu)建知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省過程中已經(jīng)取得的成果和普遍存在的問題。緊接著依據(jù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省理念,從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造、運(yùn)用、保護(hù)、服務(wù)四個(gè)角度出發(fā),參考國家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)局發(fā)布的相關(guān)信息和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)指數(shù)報(bào)告,以及其他專家的研究成果,海選出125個(gè)指標(biāo)。先進(jìn)行定量分析,通過R型聚類對每一因素層下的指標(biāo)層進(jìn)行分類,再利用距離相關(guān)分析檢驗(yàn)聚類結(jié)果的合理性;緊接著比較每一組指標(biāo)的變異系數(shù)大小,變異系數(shù)越大表明指標(biāo)特征越明顯,越具有代表性,應(yīng)當(dāng)保留,而該組的其他指標(biāo)就要?jiǎng)h除�；赗型聚類—變異系數(shù)分析,建立一套完整的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。再進(jìn)行定性分析,綜合專家組的意見對評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行完善。然后,采用改進(jìn)的理想解法構(gòu)建知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省建設(shè)績效評價(jià)模型。選取江蘇省作為實(shí)證評價(jià)對象,另外再選取全國主要省份作為參考對象,依據(jù)構(gòu)建好的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系對選取的主要省份強(qiáng)省建設(shè)績效進(jìn)行評價(jià),得到江蘇省總體建設(shè)情況排名和各個(gè)指標(biāo)的詳細(xì)排名。最后,依據(jù)評價(jià)結(jié)果,對江蘇省知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省建設(shè)總體情況進(jìn)行總結(jié),并針對各個(gè)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析,找出江蘇省在構(gòu)建知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省過程中的優(yōu)勢與不足,針對不足之處,提出相關(guān)對策建議。
[Abstract]:The construction of strong province of intellectual property conforms to the needs of building a powerful intellectual property power. As the strength of intellectual property becomes the main aspect of international competition, It is necessary to step up the construction of a strong intellectual property power and a strong province. Intellectual property rights have been neglected in the past social and economic development of our country, especially when the public and enterprise groups have not established a correct awareness of intellectual property rights. Not knowing how to respect the fruits of intellectual labor hinders the scientific and technological progress and innovation of the whole society. It is very important to carry out the research on the evaluation of the construction performance of the strong province of intellectual property. Firstly, the research background of the paper and the related research results at home and abroad are combed out. In order to lay a theoretical and academic background for the follow-up study, taking Jiangsu Province as the research object, before the formal study, the author made a basic analysis of the current situation of the construction of a strong province with strong intellectual property rights in Jiangsu Province. According to the work report issued by the government and previous academic research, Clarify the achievements and problems that Jiangsu has achieved in the process of building a strong province with intellectual property rights. Then, according to the concept of strong province of intellectual property, from four angles of creating, using, protecting and serving intellectual property, Referring to the relevant information and intellectual property index reports issued by the State intellectual property Office and the research results of other experts, 125 indicators were selected. First, quantitative analysis was carried out, and the index layers under each factor layer were classified through R-type clustering. Then using distance correlation analysis to test the rationality of the clustering results; then comparing the variation coefficient of each set of indicators, the larger the coefficient of variation is, the more obvious the characteristics of the indicators are, the more representative they are, and the more they should be retained. On the basis of R-type clustering and coefficient of variation analysis, a complete set of intellectual property evaluation index system is established. Then qualitative analysis is carried out, and the evaluation index system is improved by synthesizing the opinions of the expert group. Then, The improved ideal solution is used to construct the performance evaluation model of strong intellectual property province. Jiangsu Province is chosen as the object of empirical evaluation, and the main provinces in China are chosen as reference objects. According to the established evaluation index system of strong provinces with intellectual property rights, the performance of the selected major provinces is evaluated, and the overall construction status of Jiangsu Province and the detailed ranking of each index are obtained. Finally, according to the evaluation results, This paper summarizes the general situation of the construction of a strong province with strong intellectual property rights in Jiangsu Province, and analyzes each index in detail, finds out the advantages and disadvantages in the process of constructing a strong province of intellectual property rights in Jiangsu Province, and puts forward some relevant countermeasures and suggestions in view of the shortcomings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F204

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊巧;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國指標(biāo)體系初探[J];西安文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年01期

2 謝小勇;劉淑華;韓秀成;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)基本問題初探[J];中國科學(xué)院院刊;2016年09期

3 陳燕;陳澤欣;謝小勇;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建與分析[J];中國科學(xué)院院刊;2016年09期

4 張鵬;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)基本問題初探[J];科技與法律;2016年01期

5 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國研究課題組;韓秀成;陳燕;謝小勇;劉淑華;;對知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)的理論思考[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年12期

6 李美娟;陳國宏;林志炳;徐林明;;基于理想解法的動(dòng)態(tài)評價(jià)方法研究[J];中國管理科學(xué);2015年10期

7 張志成;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)初探[J];科技與法律;2015年04期

8 董新凱;田源;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省界定及其評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2015年07期

9 趙宇哲;劉芳;;生態(tài)港口評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建—基于R聚類、變異系數(shù)與專家經(jīng)驗(yàn)的分析[J];科研管理;2015年02期

10 陳春暉;王雅利;;區(qū)域知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施績效評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];科技創(chuàng)新與生產(chǎn)力;2014年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 支蘇平;;加快知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省建設(shè) 著力推動(dòng)江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展[N];江蘇科技報(bào);2015年

2 徐南平;;加快建設(shè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)省 努力開創(chuàng)科學(xué)發(fā)展新局面[N];新華日報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 羅群燕;基于協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)合作績效評價(jià)研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2016年

2 周欣;上�？萍紕�(chuàng)新能力評價(jià)研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2016年

3 蔣淑;MC集團(tuán)（中國）公司目標(biāo)導(dǎo)向的績效管理體系研究[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

4 楊寶華;建安公司績效管理體系研究與設(shè)計(jì)[D];上海海事大學(xué);2005年

5 黃頌亞;成都SF公司績效考證系統(tǒng)研究與設(shè)計(jì)[D];四川大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1558311