本文關(guān)鍵詞： 自貿(mào)區(qū) 轉(zhuǎn)運貨物 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法　出處：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文通過分析歐盟和美國的相關(guān)制度來研究我國自貿(mào)區(qū)內(nèi)關(guān)于轉(zhuǎn)運貨物的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法制度。引言明確了研究對象、分析了國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀和研究意義并提出了論文思路和結(jié)構(gòu)。正文共兩章,最后是結(jié)論。第一章闡述了自貿(mào)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)運貨物知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法的基本理論。首先明確了自貿(mào)區(qū)的概念和自貿(mào)區(qū)內(nèi)海關(guān)的法律地位,指出海關(guān)在自貿(mào)區(qū)內(nèi)享有邊境執(zhí)法權(quán),進(jìn)口稅費除外。其次,界定了轉(zhuǎn)運貨物和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法的含義,最后闡明了對自貿(mào)區(qū)內(nèi)轉(zhuǎn)運貨物進(jìn)行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法的必要性和正當(dāng)性。第二章論述了我國自貿(mào)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)運貨物的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法制度的構(gòu)建。首先,通過分析比較歐盟和美國的關(guān)于轉(zhuǎn)運貨物的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法規(guī)則,從而明確了我國自貿(mào)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)運貨物的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法規(guī)則,即采納歐盟的“進(jìn)入市場可能性論”；其次從適用范圍、權(quán)利主體范圍、執(zhí)法程序和聯(lián)合執(zhí)法四個方面對歐盟于2013年頒布的《海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)條例》的海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法制度進(jìn)行了研究；最后,在結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)有的關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法的法律規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,指出我國應(yīng)首先明確自貿(mào)區(qū)海關(guān)對于轉(zhuǎn)運貨物的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法權(quán),其次分別從完善現(xiàn)有備案制度、降低申請審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、變革實施程序和建立國際合作執(zhí)法機制等方面來解決我國海關(guān)在實際執(zhí)法中的難題,從而為我國自貿(mào)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)運貨物的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法制度的構(gòu)建提供實際可行的有效建議。
[Abstract]:The study of China's trade in goods transport on IPR border enforcement system through the analysis of the relevant system of the European Union and the United States. The introduction clarifies the research object, analyzes the status and significance of the research and put forward the ideas and structure. The text consists of two chapters, the last part is the conclusion. The first chapter expounds the basic theory of the border law enforcement of intellectual property rights of the FTA transshipment. First, a clear legal status of the concept and the FTA FTA customs, customs have pointed out that border enforcement right of free trade in the region, except for import taxes. Secondly, the definition of border enforcement transshipment and the meaning of intellectual property, and finally clarifies the necessity and justification of IPR border enforcement Free Trade Zone transshipment. The second chapter discusses the construction of China's FTA transhipment IPR border enforcement system. First of all, through the Comparison between the European Union and the United States on the transshipment of intellectual property border enforcement rules, in order to make clear of China's FTA transhipment IPR border enforcement rules, namely the adoption of EU "to enter the market possibility theory"; secondly from the scope, the scope of the subject of rights, studied four aspects of law enforcement procedures and joint enforcement of EU promulgated in 2013 "Customs Protection of intellectual property rights regulations on Customs Enforcement of intellectual property rights system; finally, on the basis of our country existing on border enforcement of intellectual property laws and regulations, and points out that China should first clear the FTA customs for transhipment enforcement of intellectual property right, followed by improving the existing filing system, reduce for the standard of review, change implementation procedures and the establishment of international cooperation in law enforcement mechanism so as to solve China's customs problem in the actual enforcement, from It provides practical and effective suggestions for the construction of the border enforcement system of intellectual property rights in the trans shipment of goods in China's free trade area.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 唐天安;我國自貿(mào)區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)運貨物的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境執(zhí)法制度研究[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1537528