本文關鍵詞： 軟件 軟件缺陷 軟件缺陷法律責任 歸責原則 特殊侵權　出處：《重慶大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在以互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和計算機為基礎的信息時代，以智力和信息為主要內容的軟件被大量生產(chǎn)與消費，成為市場交易中的新興客體。互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的普及與計算機技術的發(fā)展促使了大數(shù)據(jù)的產(chǎn)生，軟件則是收集、傳遞、儲存這些大數(shù)據(jù)的端口。這些數(shù)據(jù)包含了人們的財產(chǎn)、隱私、行為軌跡等個人信息。軟件亦呈科技化、危險化的使用，因此軟件一旦因缺陷給用戶造成損害，將給用戶個人、社會乃至國家造成深刻的影響。在鼓勵技術發(fā)展的早期，各國對于軟件更多地是作為一種智力成果給予知識產(chǎn)權保護。但軟件從嚴格意義上來說是一種具有特殊意義的產(chǎn)品，隨著商品經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，從“產(chǎn)品責任”的角度維護用戶合法權益的要求越來越迫切。這種“產(chǎn)品責任”不同于產(chǎn)品責任法中的產(chǎn)品責任，軟件產(chǎn)品有其自身的特殊性，因此軟件缺陷法律責任是一種特殊的侵權責任，，有其自己的歸責原則、法律構成及免責事由等。 本文以知識與技術為基礎的高技術社會風險的產(chǎn)生為背景，分五個部分對軟件缺陷法律責任進行了論述。第一部分考察了軟件的基本內涵、分類、相關法律保護、軟件的產(chǎn)品屬性及軟件缺陷；第二部分通過對軟件與一般產(chǎn)品及智力產(chǎn)品的比較，詳細闡述軟件缺陷法律責任的法律性質；第三部分通過借鑒國外相關理論并對比一般產(chǎn)品責任歸責原則，加以比較分析，提出軟件缺陷法律責任的歸責原則；第四部分系統(tǒng)論述了軟件缺陷的認定及其造成的損害后果的內涵，以及兩者之間的因果關系的認定；最后一部分具體介紹了軟件缺陷法律責任的責任承擔主體、免責事由和責任的承擔方式。本文主要是通過對美國、歐洲等一些國家的智力產(chǎn)品侵權的司法判例，并結合比較產(chǎn)品責任的基本理論，對軟件缺陷法律責任進行探討，同時對軟件缺陷法律責任的基本問題提出一些建議。
[Abstract]:In the age of information based on the Internet and computers, software with intelligence and information as its main content was produced and consumed in large quantities. The popularity of the Internet and the development of computer technology have prompted big data's emergence, while software is the port of collecting, transmitting and storing the big data. These data contain people's property and privacy. Behavior trajectory and other personal information. Software is also scientific and dangerous to use. Therefore, once the software is damaged by defects, it will have a profound impact on the individual, society and even the country. In the early stage of encouraging the development of technology, Most countries give intellectual property protection to software as a kind of intellectual achievement, but software is a product of special significance in the strict sense, with the development of commodity economy, It is more and more urgent to maintain the legitimate rights and interests of users from the point of view of "product liability". This kind of "product liability" is different from the product liability in the law of product liability, and the software product has its own particularity. Therefore, the legal liability for software defects is a special tort liability, with its own imputation principle, legal constitution and exoneration. This paper discusses the legal liability of software defects in five parts based on the background of high-tech social risks based on knowledge and technology. The first part examines the basic connotation, classification, and related legal protection of software. The second part elaborates the legal nature of the legal liability of software defects by comparing software with general products and intellectual products. The third part puts forward the principle of imputation of legal liability of software defects by referring to the relevant theories of foreign countries and comparing the general principles of product liability imputation. The 4th part systematically discusses the connotation of the software defect and its damage consequences, and the causality between the two. The last part introduces the main body of the legal liability of the software defect. This paper mainly discusses the legal liability of software defects through judicial cases of intellectual product infringement in some countries such as the United States and Europe, and combining with the basic theory of comparative product liability. At the same time, some suggestions on the legal liability of software defects are put forward.
【學位授予單位】：重慶大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923;D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 齊愛民;;信息社會中個人信息的濫用與人格權侵害[J];重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2007年04期

2 戴浩然;論智力產(chǎn)品責任[J];法學;2002年09期

3 許茹英;;小議產(chǎn)品質量糾紛中的缺陷責任和瑕疵責任之區(qū)分[J];法制與社會;2012年21期

4 程圓圓;Linux現(xiàn)象及其對計算機軟件保護的啟示[J];河北法學;2001年05期

5 陳蘭蘭;論我國產(chǎn)品責任立法的完善[J];山東法學;1997年03期

6 張騏;產(chǎn)品責任中的損害與損害賠償──一個比較研究[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;1998年04期

7 石慧榮;產(chǎn)品缺陷研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學;1996年02期

8 黃錫生;中美產(chǎn)品責任立法比較研究[J];西南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年02期

9 齊愛民;;論信息財產(chǎn)的法律概念和特征[J];知識產(chǎn)權;2008年02期

本文編號：1524493