發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-13 15:06

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 知識產(chǎn)權(quán) 公有領(lǐng)域 利益權(quán)衡　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：信息時(shí)代的到來,促進(jìn)科學(xué)技術(shù)快速發(fā)展,導(dǎo)致知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍逐漸被擴(kuò)大、保護(hù)期限也越來越長,帶來知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的私產(chǎn)化現(xiàn)象泛濫,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公有領(lǐng)域不斷被擠壓。公有領(lǐng)域是指不受知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律(廣義)保護(hù)或者知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律保護(hù)延伸效力所不及的智慧成果,即知識產(chǎn)權(quán)專有領(lǐng)域之外的范疇,其在歸屬上具有有主性,在使用上具有無償性。公有領(lǐng)域與專有領(lǐng)域的利益權(quán)衡機(jī)制是保護(hù)公有領(lǐng)域的關(guān)鍵。保護(hù)公有領(lǐng)域需要對專有領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行逐步的完善和合理的限制。立法上首先要更新立法理念,打破知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公有領(lǐng)域不受保護(hù)的觀念,整合知識產(chǎn)權(quán)立法,促進(jìn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律體系化。其次逐步完善著作權(quán)法、專利法、商標(biāo)法的相關(guān)規(guī)定,合理限制專有領(lǐng)域。司法上,嚴(yán)格遵循知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法定主義原則,即知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的類別、內(nèi)容、獲得條件和保護(hù)期限都應(yīng)由法律規(guī)定,除法律另有規(guī)定外,任何人不得在法律之外創(chuàng)設(shè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)。司法中嚴(yán)格遵循知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法定主義原則,這需要更多的司法實(shí)踐操作才能形成系統(tǒng)的有序的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:The arrival of the information age has promoted the rapid development of science and technology, which has led to the gradual expansion of the scope of protection of intellectual property rights, the longer and longer the protection period, and the proliferation of the phenomenon of privatizing intellectual property rights. The public domain of intellectual property rights is constantly squeezed. The public domain refers to the intellectual achievements that are not protected by intellectual property law (broad sense) or the extension of intellectual property legal protection, that is, outside the exclusive domain of intellectual property. It has the ownership in the attribution, The benefit balance mechanism between the public domain and the exclusive domain is the key to protect the public domain. The protection of the public domain requires the gradual improvement and reasonable restriction of the proprietary field. To break the idea that the public domain of intellectual property is not protected, to integrate the legislation of intellectual property and to promote the legal system of intellectual property. Secondly, to gradually improve the relevant provisions of the copyright Law, the Patent Law, the Trademark Law, and to reasonably restrict the exclusive field. Strictly following the principle of legal doctrine of intellectual property rights, that is, the categories, contents, conditions for obtaining and duration of protection of intellectual property rights shall be prescribed by law, unless otherwise stipulated by law, No one can create intellectual property rights outside the law. The principle of intellectual property legalism is strictly followed in the administration of justice, which requires more judicial practice in order to form a systematic and orderly standard.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張艷梅;;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)條約體系下的國際公共領(lǐng)域探究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2011年04期

2 胡開忠;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法中公有領(lǐng)域的保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);2008年08期

3 安麗紅;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與公共利益探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年23期

4 楊瀛谷;;試析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共領(lǐng)域與專有領(lǐng)域的平衡[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年06期

5 呂志華;從彼得兔案件看商標(biāo)權(quán)與版權(quán)之正當(dāng)使用[J];工商行政管理;2004年13期

6 馬寧;楊暉;;合理使用“法律人”不侵權(quán)[J];中華商標(biāo);2006年01期

7 梁慧星;電視節(jié)目預(yù)告表的法律保護(hù)與利益衡量[J];法學(xué)研究;1995年02期

8 王太平;楊峰;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法中的公共領(lǐng)域[J];法學(xué)研究;2008年01期

9 劉媛;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法上的公共領(lǐng)域無償性[J];重慶三峽學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

10 馮曉青;;著作權(quán)法中的公共領(lǐng)域理論[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 董皓;多元視角下的著作權(quán)法公共領(lǐng)域問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1508445