本文關(guān)鍵詞： 域名 商標(biāo) 權(quán)利沖突　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代的到來(lái)，使得電子商務(wù)的地位在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中得到了極大的提升。在這一過(guò)程里，商戶在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)世界的里的標(biāo)志——域名，以其特有的地位，越發(fā)顯示出其價(jià)值。但新興事物的發(fā)展必將不斷對(duì)傳統(tǒng)權(quán)利發(fā)起沖擊，必然致其與傳統(tǒng)權(quán)利產(chǎn)生糾紛，從而挑戰(zhàn)法律的與時(shí)俱進(jìn)。這一問(wèn)題，顯然也存在與當(dāng)前我國(guó)的法律實(shí)踐之中。當(dāng)前，域名與商標(biāo)權(quán)利的沖突不斷加大，使其成為理論界以及實(shí)務(wù)界迫于解決的問(wèn)題。筆者以基礎(chǔ)理論的方式對(duì)這一問(wèn)題展開研究與探討，試圖在結(jié)合學(xué)術(shù)界的部分觀點(diǎn)上，提出一些可行的解決方案，以期在實(shí)踐之中得以應(yīng)用。 除去引言與結(jié)語(yǔ)部分，本文正文分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分，主要針對(duì)域名的一般法律屬性進(jìn)行討論，主要分為其定義、特征、法律地位等。筆者從域名的定義以及其基本特征入手，，在討論域名基本特征的前提下，對(duì)域名和商標(biāo)權(quán)利進(jìn)行了對(duì)比。同時(shí)，筆者分析了學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)于域名法律地位的認(rèn)定，在此基礎(chǔ)上，認(rèn)為域名具有與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)相識(shí)的特征而應(yīng)當(dāng)將其作為一種獨(dú)立的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)進(jìn)行認(rèn)定。 第二部分，主要針對(duì)當(dāng)前實(shí)務(wù)中域名與商標(biāo)權(quán)利的沖突原因與其常見類型進(jìn)行分析。筆者從內(nèi)部和外部原因?qū)Χ叩臎_突進(jìn)行分析，內(nèi)部原因即為域名與商標(biāo)二者之間存在的固有區(qū)別而導(dǎo)致的原因。外部原因即為當(dāng)前國(guó)際以及國(guó)內(nèi)通行的注冊(cè)體質(zhì)所存在的問(wèn)題。同時(shí)，筆者分析了目前實(shí)務(wù)中所存在的幾種常見的沖突類型。 第三部分，主要是對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外針對(duì)域名與商標(biāo)權(quán)利沖突的立法進(jìn)行分析。主要是針對(duì)當(dāng)前互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)達(dá)的美國(guó)、日本以及德國(guó)進(jìn)行分析，同時(shí)對(duì)其中有利的部分進(jìn)行借鑒。進(jìn)而分析我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)目前主要用以調(diào)整該沖突的立法，與上述的國(guó)家進(jìn)行一定的對(duì)比。 第四部分，分析我國(guó)目前域名與商標(biāo)權(quán)利沖突中存在的問(wèn)題并提出完善建議。筆者認(rèn)為，當(dāng)前我國(guó)存在的問(wèn)題主要有，域名與商標(biāo)權(quán)利發(fā)生沖突時(shí)，其法律性質(zhì)無(wú)法確定，同時(shí)我國(guó)對(duì)于惡意的認(rèn)定之規(guī)定較為籠統(tǒng)。筆者對(duì)這些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析，同時(shí)結(jié)合上述國(guó)外的立法，提出了部分合理的完善建議。
[Abstract]:With the advent of network economy, the status of electronic commerce has been greatly improved in the market economy. In this process, the domain name, the symbol of business in the Internet world, has its unique status. More and more show its value. But the development of new things will continue to impact on the traditional rights, it will inevitably lead to disputes with the traditional rights, thus challenging the law with the times. Obviously, there is also a conflict between domain name and trademark rights in the current legal practice of our country. The author studies and discusses this problem in the way of basic theory, and tries to put forward some feasible solutions in combination with some viewpoints of academic circles. In order to be applied in practice. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts: The first part mainly discusses the general legal attributes of domain name, mainly divided into its definition, characteristics, legal status, etc. The author starts with the definition of domain name and its basic characteristics. On the premise of discussing the basic characteristics of domain name, the author compares the domain name and trademark rights. At the same time, the author analyzes the legal status of the domain name in academia, on this basis. Domain name should be recognized as an independent intellectual property because it has the characteristics of acquaintance with intellectual property. The second part mainly analyzes the conflict causes and common types of domain name and trademark rights in current practice. The author analyzes the conflict between the two from the internal and external reasons. The internal reason is the inherent difference between the domain name and the trademark. The external reason is the existing problem of the current international and domestic registration constitution. At the same time. The author analyzes several common conflict types in practice. The third part is mainly to analyze the domestic and foreign legislation on the conflict between domain name and trademark rights, mainly for the United States, Japan and Germany, where the Internet is developed. At the same time, the author draws lessons from the beneficial part, and then analyzes the domestic legislation which is mainly used to adjust the conflict, and compares it with the above countries to a certain extent. Part 4th analyzes the problems existing in the conflict between domain name and trademark rights in China and puts forward some suggestions. The author believes that the main problems in China are when the domain name and trademark rights conflict. The nature of the law can not be determined, at the same time, the provisions of malicious identification in our country are relatively general. The author analyzes these problems, and at the same time, combined with the foreign legislation, puts forward some reasonable suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 謝芳林;ICANN的相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題——兼評(píng)我國(guó)CNNIC域名管理中的法律問(wèn)題[J];中華商標(biāo);2003年12期

2 周春慧;;域名注冊(cè)制度反思[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年09期

3 邵培樟;;論域名的法律性質(zhì)[J];河北法學(xué);2006年06期

4 胡曉紅,魏浩征;美國(guó)域名與商標(biāo)侵權(quán)沖突法律制度研究——《反網(wǎng)域霸占消費(fèi)者保護(hù)法》對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

5 馮曉青;域名與商標(biāo)的權(quán)利沖突及其解決探討[J];天津市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

6 譚仲秋;;奧運(yùn)冠軍域名搶注及法律調(diào)整[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年08期

7 楊小蘭;;論馳名商標(biāo)的反淡化保護(hù)[J];四川理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期

本文編號(hào)：1471678