本文關(guān)鍵詞： 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁 可仲裁性 仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)建設(shè)　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁是指知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛中的各方當(dāng)事人以自愿協(xié)商的方式將爭(zhēng)議交付仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)解決，同時(shí)承認(rèn)仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)所做裁決效力，并自愿受其約束。該制度在解決知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛中所展現(xiàn)出的較其它糾紛解決機(jī)制更為高效、方便、快捷及保密性更強(qiáng)的特點(diǎn)，引發(fā)國(guó)際社會(huì)的普遍關(guān)注。由于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛有別與其他民商事糾紛，其高度的復(fù)雜性與專(zhuān)業(yè)性都使得此類(lèi)糾紛的解決方式區(qū)別于普通的民商事糾紛。因此，各國(guó)都開(kāi)始了對(duì)該項(xiàng)制度的研究，在國(guó)際上也只是屈指可數(shù)的一些國(guó)家建立起了相對(duì)完善的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁制度。該制度在我國(guó)的發(fā)展還處于萌芽期，作為我國(guó)設(shè)立該項(xiàng)制度基礎(chǔ)的機(jī)構(gòu)構(gòu)建的并不完善，還不能為當(dāng)事人提供較為專(zhuān)業(yè)的法律服務(wù)。因此，本文通過(guò)分析、比較國(guó)外的較為成熟的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁制度運(yùn)作經(jīng)驗(yàn)，分析和歸納我國(guó)目前通過(guò)一般仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)解決知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛過(guò)程中存在的不足，然后，在此基礎(chǔ)上提出自己的完善建議。 全文除引言外共分為四個(gè)部分，主要內(nèi)容如下： 本文第一部分重點(diǎn)是對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁制度進(jìn)行總括式的分析。通過(guò)對(duì)該制度的定義、制度特征及優(yōu)點(diǎn)作出了闡釋?zhuān)康氖菫榱送怀鲅芯吭撝贫鹊膬r(jià)值所在。將該糾紛解決機(jī)制與其他解決方式進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單對(duì)比，凸顯出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁制度的優(yōu)越性，而目前我國(guó)這一制度基本還未建立起來(lái)，從而引發(fā)了筆者的思考。 本文第二部分重點(diǎn)是對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁制度中的核心問(wèn)題知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的可仲裁性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了討論。分別定性的分析了可仲裁性理論基礎(chǔ)、爭(zhēng)議的交點(diǎn)等，并且對(duì)于可仲裁性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)劃定進(jìn)行了闡釋?zhuān)缓蠓诸?lèi)型探討了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛和權(quán)屬糾紛的可仲裁性問(wèn)題，目地是為我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁機(jī)制的建立提供理論依據(jù)。 本文第三部分重點(diǎn)對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行分析研究。由于我國(guó)涉足該領(lǐng)域的時(shí)間較晚，具體專(zhuān)門(mén)機(jī)構(gòu)并沒(méi)有真正建立起來(lái)。所以筆者主要是選取了域外的幾個(gè)典型的實(shí)例做了對(duì)比研究，包括大型國(guó)際性仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)以及世界上幾個(gè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)實(shí)力突出國(guó)家的仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)。對(duì)比分析這些機(jī)構(gòu)的優(yōu)勢(shì)及不足，尋求值得參考的要件，，凸顯出建立的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域?qū)ｉT(mén)化仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的必要性。我國(guó)在這一領(lǐng)域做了一定的探索性的嘗試，雖然成效并不顯著，但其實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)于今后該項(xiàng)制度的建立與完善卻是極為珍貴的。充分分析和提煉國(guó)外典型范例的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，將會(huì)為我國(guó)將來(lái)成功設(shè)立知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的專(zhuān)門(mén)化仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)提供有益參考。 本文第四部分重點(diǎn)是針對(duì)完善我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁制度提出了幾點(diǎn)個(gè)人的粗淺建議。主要是選擇從制度建設(shè)、機(jī)構(gòu)建設(shè)、以及平衡與其他糾紛解決機(jī)制關(guān)系等方面提些建議。希望這些建議有為填補(bǔ)我國(guó)當(dāng)前知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁制度空白作出一定的貢獻(xiàn)的可能。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property arbitration refers to the parties to intellectual property disputes in the form of voluntary consultation to submit the dispute to the arbitration institution for settlement, while recognizing the validity of the award made by the arbitration institution. The system is more efficient, convenient, fast and confidential than other dispute resolution mechanisms in the settlement of intellectual property disputes. As intellectual property disputes are different from other civil and commercial disputes, their high complexity and professionalism make the settlement of such disputes different from ordinary civil and commercial disputes. All countries have begun to study the system, and only a handful of countries in the world have established a relatively perfect intellectual property arbitration system, which is still in its infancy in China. As the foundation of the establishment of this system in China, the establishment of the organization is not perfect, can not provide more professional legal services for the parties. Therefore, this paper through the analysis. Compared with the foreign more mature intellectual property arbitration system operation experience, analyzes and summarizes our country through the general arbitration institutions in the process of solving intellectual property disputes in the process of deficiencies, and then. On this basis, put forward their own suggestions for improvement. In addition to the introduction, the full text is divided into four parts, the main content is as follows: The first part of this paper focuses on the analysis of the intellectual property arbitration system. Through the definition of the system, the characteristics and advantages of the system are explained. The purpose is to highlight the value of the study of the system. The dispute settlement mechanism is compared with other solutions, highlighting the advantages of the intellectual property arbitration system. At present, this system has not been established in our country, which leads to the author's thinking. The second part of this paper focuses on the core issues of intellectual property arbitration system, the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes, respectively qualitative analysis of arbitrability theoretical basis, the intersection of disputes and so on. And to arbitrability standard delineation has carried on the explanation, then has discussed the intellectual property right infringement dispute and the ownership dispute arbitrability question according to the type. The aim is to provide theoretical basis for the establishment of intellectual property arbitration mechanism in China. The third part of this paper focuses on the analysis of intellectual property arbitration institutions. The specific specialized agencies have not really been established. So the author mainly selects several typical examples from abroad to do a comparative study. Including large international arbitration institutions and several countries with outstanding intellectual property rights in the world. Comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of these institutions seeking for reference elements. Highlights the establishment of the intellectual property field of specialized arbitration institutions. China has made a certain exploratory attempt in this field, although the results are not significant. However, its practical experience is very precious for the establishment and improvement of the system in the future. It will provide useful reference for our country to set up specialized arbitration institution in the field of intellectual property in the future. The 4th part of this paper is focused on the improvement of intellectual property arbitration system in China put forward a few personal suggestions, mainly from the system construction, institutional construction. Some suggestions on balancing the relationship with other dispute settlement mechanisms are put forward. It is hoped that these suggestions will contribute to filling up the gaps in the current intellectual property arbitration system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.7;D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 傅郁林;;仲裁權(quán)的制約機(jī)制與仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的管理模式——以民事審判權(quán)為對(duì)照[J];北京仲裁;2007年02期

2 叢雪蓮;羅楚湘;;仲裁訴訟化若干問(wèn)題探討[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年06期

3 范愉;;權(quán)利救濟(jì)與多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制簡(jiǎn)議[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

4 吳巍;陳佳強(qiáng);;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事糾紛的仲裁性研究——類(lèi)型化的視角[J];河北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

5 王偉;;論糾紛解決訴訟化的積極性與消極性[J];求索;2008年04期

本文編號(hào)：1452596